Central Administrative Tribunal

Court

Latest documents

• OA No.060/00465/205 and MA No.060/01091/2016. Case: 1. Karam Singh 2. Sawroop Lal 3. Karam Chand Vs 1. Union of India, Ministry of Railway through its Secretary 2. Divisional Railway Manager 3. Senior Divisional Personnel Officer 4. Senior Section Engineer 5. Assistant Divisional Engineer. Central Administrative Tribunal
• Original Application No. 180/00474/2016. Case: M.K. Kutty Krishnan Nair Vs The Director, Central Institute of Fisheries Technology. Central Administrative Tribunal
• OA No. 060/00563/2017. Case: Karambeer S/o Sh. Leelu Ram Vs Union Territory of Chandigarh through Home Secretary and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal
• Original Application No. 180/00125/2016. Case: P.K. Krishnankutty Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal
• Original Application No.180/00338/2017. Case: Unnikrishnan T.V. Lower Division Clerk Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal
• O.A. No.060/00571/2017. Case: Sanjiv Kaul and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal
• Original Applications N0. 060/00835/2016. Case: P.K. Sarin Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal
• Original Application No. 256 of 2015. Case: Ram Lakhan Yadav Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal
• O.A. No.060/01097/2016. Case: Harpreet Singh son of Jaswant Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal
• Original Application No. 217 of 2015. Case: Ram Narayan Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal

Featured documents

• O.A No. 060/00213/2014. Case: 06 Nov 2015 Vs The Chief Administrator, U.T. Chandigarh and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal
• Original Application No. 79/2009. Case: 1. A. Venkat Reddy, 2. B. V. Srinivas Rao, 3. N. Padmaja Vs 1. Chief Postmaster General, Hyderabad, 2. Postmaster General, Hyderabad, 3. Union of India Director General of Posts, New Delhi, 4. P. C. Jain, 5. P. Jhansi Lakshmi, 6. M. S. Beig, 7. B. Vijaya Kumar. Central Administrative Tribunal
• Original Application No. 177/2007. Case: 1. Archana Jain W/o Late Sita Ram Jain, 2. Jaswant Sharma S/o Jagdish Chander Sharma, 3. Inderpal S/o Panna Lal, 4. Swroop Chand S/o Mangal Chand, 5. Rajendra Kumar S/o Jai Singh, 6. Jagdish Prasad S/o Chhaju Ram Vs 1. Union of India, Through General Manager, North Western Railway, Jaipur, 2. Divisional Railway Manager, North Western Railway, Jaipur, 3. Om Prakash Sharma S/o Radhey Shyam Sharma, 4. Mohan Kishan Bassi S/o Vas Deo Bassi, 5. Om Prakash S/o Ganga Ram, 6. Jagdish Prasad S/o Rama Kishan, 7. Mata Deen Meena S/o Kana Ram, 8. Kuldeep Singh Choudhary. Central Administrative Tribunal
• O.A. No. 571/2008. Case: 1. B. Radhakrishnan Pillai, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad, 2. R. Krishnanakumar, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad, 3. S. Afsar Ahamed, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad, 4. M. Murali, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad, 5. K. Chandran, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad, 6. N. Ganesan, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad, 7. R. Prasad, Passenger Guard (Adhoc), Southern Railway, Palakkad Vs 1. Union of India, Secretary, Ministry of Railways, New Delhi, 2. General Manager, Southern Railway, Madras, 3. Chief Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Madras, 4. Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Palghat, 5. Railway Board, Secretary, New Delhi. Central Administrative Tribunal
• Review Application No. 9 of 2012 (in OA No. 14 of 2010) & Civil Contempt Petition No. 49 of 2012 (in OA No. 14 of 2010). Case: 1. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., 2. P.R.S. Chouhan Vs 1. P.R.S. Chouhan, 2. Shri Sudhir Kumar Bhandari and Shri Rahul Dongre. Central Administrative Tribunal
• O. A. No. 224/2009. Case: 1. D. L. Anilkumar S/o J. Dharmadas, Radio Operator, presently posted as Supervisor (Communication) O/o Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, ICE Bhavan, Thiruvanathapuram, 2. V. Kumaraswamy, Supervisor (Communication) Central Excise Head quarters, Thiruvanathapuram, 3. M. R. Ramesh, Radio Operator, Central Excise Head quarters Cochin Vs 1. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance North Block, New Delhi, 2. Secretary, Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi, 3. Chairman Board of Central Excise and Customs North Block, New Delhi, 4. Commissioner, Directorate of Logistics, A Wing, New Delhi, 5. Additional Director (Communication), Shopping Centre, New Delhi, 6. Commissioner, Customs Preventive, Commissionerate, Ernakulam Kochi, 7. Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs Central Revenue Building, Thiruvanathapuram, 8. Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs Central Revenue Building, Cochin. Central Administrative Tribunal
• RA No. 359 of 2011 in OA No. 492 of 2009 and OA No. 493 of 2009. Case: 1. Dr. Rajendra Prasad Mishra & Ors., 2. Dr. B. Gangwar and Ors. Vs 1. Union of India & Ors., Union of India and The Project Directorate for Cropping Systems Research, 2. Union of India and The Project Directorate for Cropping Systems Research, [Alongwith RA No. 357/2011 in O.A. No. 493/2009]. Central Administrative Tribunal
• OA No.946/2008 and MA No.775/2008. Case: 1. Hari Prakash S/o Ved Prakash, 2. Varun Singh S/o Fushan Singh, 3.Raghbir Singh S/o Mange Ram, 4. Ved Pal S/o Jihana, 5. Ajit Kumar Kotya S/o Khushi Ram, 6. Navender Garg S/o Vishnu Dutt Gupta, 7. Ravindra Singh S/o Bharat Singh Vs 1. Union of India: through Secretary, New Delhi, 2. Union of India: through General Manager, New Delhi, 3. Union of India: through Divl. Railway Manager, New Delhi. Central Administrative Tribunal
• O. A. No. 3423/2010. Case: 1. Jagdish Chandra S/o Late Udai Ram, 2. S. K. Mohadikar S/o K. M. Mohadikar, 3. Harvinder Kumar Arora S/o Devi Dayal Arora, 4. Nirmal Bisht W/o Lok Pal Singh Bisht, 5. Shanti Verma W/o Tilak Raj Verma, 6. Vimal Kumar Vajpayee S/o Late Shiv Mangal Vajpayee, 7. Ramesh Kumar Sharma S/o J. P. Sharma, 8. Naresh Kumar Sharma S/o Late Ram Kishan Sharma, 9. Kuldeep Raj Sharma S/o R. C. Sharma Vs 1. Delhi Transport Corporation, Government of NCT, Through its Chairman cum Managing Director, 2. Government of NCTD, Through Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Transport Department, 3. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, Delhi. Central Administrative Tribunal
• Original Application No. 751 of 2007. Case: 1. K. I. Mohammed Koya, Police Constable No. 346, Kavaratti Police Station, Union Territory of Lakshadweep; 2. N. Pookunhi Koya, Police Constable No. 347, Kavaratti Police Station, Union Territory of Lakshadweep; 3. E. Syed Poo, Police Constable No. 343, Kavaratti Police Station, Union Territory of Lakshadweep; 4. P. I. Kunhi Koya, Police Constable No. 289, Kavaratti Police Station, Union Territory of Lakshadweep; 5. A. Pathummabi, Police Constable No. 367, Kavaratti Police Station, Union Territory of Lakshadweep Vs 1. Union of India, Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi; 2. Administrator, Union Territory of Lakshadweep; 3. Superintendent of Police, Union Territory of Lakshadweep. Central Administrative Tribunal