Central Administrative Tribunal

Court

Latest documents

• Original Application No. 180/00474/2016. Case: M.K. Kutty Krishnan Nair Vs The Director, Central Institute of Fisheries Technology. Central Administrative Tribunal

  Applicant, a retired Technical Officer who was working under the respondents, is seeking full reimbursement of the medical expenses incurred by him for the treatment of his wife under the Central Services (Medical Attendance) Rules, 1944 [hereinafter referred to as the CS(MA) Rules]. His wife had undergone treatment for bilateral total knee replace...

• OA No. 060/00563/2017. Case: Karambeer S/o Sh. Leelu Ram Vs Union Territory of Chandigarh through Home Secretary and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal

  -- (i) The respondents be directed to re-conduct the height test of the applicant or be directed to appear before any Medical Board, which the respondents deem fit, to get the applicant's height re-measured particularly keeping in view the Medical Certificate dated 20.05.2017 (Annexure A-3) issued by Medanta Hospital, Gurgaon certifying that the he...

• Original Application No. 180/00125/2016. Case: P.K. Krishnankutty Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal

  1. Applicant is a Peon in the Railway Claims Tribunal, Ernakulam. He is aggrieved by non-reimbursement of the medical expenses incurred by him for treatment of his diabetic foot which according to him was advised by a private hospital in Ernakulam for amputation but got cured after undergoing treatment at Cheruppulassery Co-operative Hospital in Pa...

• Original Application No.180/00338/2017. Case: Unnikrishnan T.V. Lower Division Clerk Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal

  2. The applicant has approached this Tribunal for a declaration that denial of promotion to the applicant from the cadre of Lower Division Clerk (LDC) to the cadre of Upper Division Clerk (UDC) is discriminatory and illegal and for a direction to be issued to the respondents to promote him to higher grade within a time frame. 3. The applicant is a...

• O.A. No.060/00571/2017. Case: Sanjiv Kaul and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal

  1. Applicants Sanjiv Kaul (Regular Lecturer), Officer Incharge of Civil Engineering Department, Maninder Singh (Regular Lecturer), Officer Incharge of Department of Architecture Assistance Course, and Sukhdev Singh Bhogal (Regular Lecturer), Officer Incharge of Department of Production and Industrial Engineering, who are working in Chandigarh Colle...

• Original Applications N0. 060/00835/2016. Case: P.K. Sarin Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal

  1. The applicant joined as Junior Engineer on 02.08.1976 and was promoted as Assistant Engineer in the year 1984. He was allowed 2nd Assured Career Progression (ACP) in the scale of Rs. 10,000-325-15,200/- w.e.f. 1.7.2006. According to him, his 3rd MACP was due w.e.f. 1.9.2008. Since, the same was not granted to him, he filed Original Application N...

• Original Application No. 256 of 2015. Case: Ram Lakhan Yadav Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal

  2. The father of the applicant died on 22.1.1975. It is contended that the applicant took birth after death of his father. It is also contended that after attaining the majority, the applicant applied for appointment on compassionate ground on 24.2.2014 i.e. after ten years from attaining the majority. Thereafter, the applicant gave representation

• O.A. No.060/01097/2016. Case: Harpreet Singh son of Jaswant Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal

  1. The challenge in this Original Application (O.A.), filed by applicant Harpreet Singh son of Sh. Jaswant Singh, is to the impugned order dated 01.08.2016 (Annexure A-1), whereby he was (deemed) suspended on account of detention in criminal case, and order dated 08.11.2016 (Annexure A-3), by virtue of which, his period of suspension was further ex...

• Original Application No. 217 of 2015. Case: Ram Narayan Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal

  1. The applicant has filed this O.A. claiming difference of Gratuity amount to the tune of Rs. 43,448/- per annum as well as arrears of pay amounting to Rs. 42761/- as a result of grant of CPC alongwith interest @ 18% per annum. 2. The applicant has not filed any calculation sheet. It has been contended that the applicant inducted into Railway se...

• OA No. 060/00508/2017. Case: Sh. Jagat Singh son of Late Sh. Kharak Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal

  2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that similar matter wherein similar order was challenged before this Tribunal denying the benefit to get the facility of CGHS, came up for consideration before this Court. After exchange of pleadings, it came on record that matter regarding medical facility under CGHS, is pending with the concerned Min...

Featured documents

• Original Application No. 67/13 alongwith MA 358/2016. Case: 1 Mr Zahirkhan A Chauhan 2 Mr Amjad Nazirbhai Siddi Vs 1 Union of India 2 The General Manager, Western Railway 3 Divisional Railway Manager, W. Rly. Central Administrative Tribunal

  1. The OA 67/13 has been filed by Shri Zahirkhan A Chauhan and Shri Amjad Nazirbhai Siddi who are working in the cadre of Sr. Commercial Clerks with the respondents, seeking to appear for selection for the post of Goods Guard in (Ranker) quota. They have filed MA 92/2013 for Joint Application which ...

• O.A No. 296 / 2008. Case: 1. A. Vijayalakshmi, 2. K. S. Ragi Vs 1. Union of India, General Manager, Chennai, 2. Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Palghat, 3. Divisional Finance Manager, Palghat, 4. R. Rani, 5. Sindhu. Central Administrative Tribunal

  The 1st applicant herein is the second widow of late Shri K. B. Shashankan who died while in service on 25.9.1991 and the 2nd applicant is the daughter of the 1st applicant. The 4th respondent is the 1st wife of late Shri K.B.Shashankan and the 5th respondent is their daughter. The 4th respondent...

• OA No. 2585/2009. Case: 1. Arjun Dev S/o Lal Chand, 2. Bhagat Singh S/o Late Bishan Singh, 3. Ram Bilas S/o Inder Dev, 4. Ganesh Bhadur S/o Baldev Singh, 5. Heera Lal S/o Ganga Ram, 6. Chunnilal S/o Sumer Singh, 7. Jaswinder Singh S/o Late Ram Singh, 8. Nirmal S/o Malook Ram, 9. Ram Prakash S/o Late Indrajeet Vs 1. Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of Defence, 2. Engineer-in-Chief Branch, (EIC-3), New Delhi, 3. Chief Engineer, Headquarter Western Command, Chandigarh, 4. Chief Engineer, Air Force, Delhi Cantt., 5. Chief Engineer (Army) Chandigarh Zone, Chandigarh. Central Administrative Tribunal

  "(i) to direct the respondent No.2 to grant the same benefits to applicants as respondents have already granted in OA No.2697/03 (Raj Kishore V/s UOI & Ors.) vide implementation dt. 9.12.2004 & OA No.1018/03 dt. 5.1.2004 (Man Singh V/s UOI and order dt. 17.3.2008 in OA No.1832/07 (Bansi...

• Case: 1. B.D.S. Kharab S/o Shiv Dhan Singh, Commissioner of Income Tax, 2. H.C. Sharma, Assistant Engineer (Civil), New Delhi Municipal Council Vs 1. Union of India (UOI) through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes and Ministry of Personnel, P.G. and Pensions through its Secretary, 2. Secretary, New Delhi Municipal Council and Union of India (UOI) through Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions. Central Administrative Tribunal

  1. By this common order, we propose to dispose of two connected matters, i.e., Transferred Application No. 188/2009 and Original Application No. 1343/2009, as common questions of law and facts arise in both the cases. Learned Counsel representing the parties would also suggest likewise. Whereas,...

• T.A. No. 8/2010. Case: 1. Bharti Yadav D/o K. S. Yadav, 2. Ritesh Kumar S/o Ravinder Kumar Vs 1. Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of Health, 2. Director, All India Institute of Medical Sciences. Central Administrative Tribunal

  1. The TA 8/2010 has arisen from the WP(C) 12569/2009 transferred by the Delhi High Court vide its order dated January 08, 2010. Both the applicants in this TA are empanelled candidates for the posts of Medical Social Service Officer Grade-II under the AIIMS on the basis of a selection process...

• O. A. No. 472-HR of 2010, O. A. No. 1052-HR of 2010. Case: 1. D. N. Taneja S/o Late Nathla Ram Taneja, IFS, Addl. Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Forestry, Panchkula, Haryana, 2. Kishan Lal Manhas, IFS, PCCF-cum-Managing Director, Haryana Forest Development Corporation Limited, Panchkula Vs 1. Union of India, Through Secretary to Government of India, Department of Environment, Forests and Wildlife, New Delhi, 2. Union Public Service Commission, New Delhi, Through its Secretary, 3. State of Haryana, Through Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government Haryana, Forest Department, Chandigarh, 4. K. L. Minhas, IFS, Managing Director, Haryana Forest Development Corporation Limited, Panchkula. Central Administrative Tribunal

  2. Applicant - Shri D.N. Taneja (hereinafter referred to as 'applicant Shri Taneja') is a 1977 Batch officer of the Haryana Cadre of the Indian Forest Service ('IFS' for short). He was posted as Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (hereinafter referred to as 'APCCF') with effect from...

• OA 4398/2010. Case: 1. Dushyant Kumar S/o Gopeshwer Dayal, 2. Parvinder Kumar S/o Chattar Singh Vs 1. Commissioner of Police, PHQ, IP Estate, New Delhi, 2. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Ist Bn/DAP, New Police Lines, Kingsway Camp, Delhi. Central Administrative Tribunal

  1. The applicants are aggrieved by the Annexure A-1 order dated 24.09.2010 by which a departmental inquiry was ordered against them on the same charge on which they were tried and acquitted by the criminal court. 2. Brief facts of the case: An FIR No. 113/2008 under Sections 364-A/452/323/149/34...

• Original Application No. 683 of 2005. Case: 1. Hari Shanker S/o Late Janki Prasad, 2. Dharmendra Kumar S/o Late Janki Prasad, 3. Hemant Kumar S/o Late Janki Prasad, 4. Pushp Lata D/o Late Janki Prasad, 5. Rajkumari D/o Late Janki Prasad Vs 1. Union of India, Through the General Manger, North Central Railway, Allahabad, 2. Divisional Railway Manager (Engg.), North Central Railway, Allahabad Division, Allahabad, 3. Divisional Superintending Engineer (II), North Central Railway, Allahabad Division, Allahabad, 4. Assistant Engineer (Track), North Central Railway, Tundla. Central Administrative Tribunal

  1. The applicants herein are the legal heirs of one Shri Janki Prasad, who was employed in the Railways since 1971. The said Janki Prasad was removed from service, in the wake of a disciplinary proceeding, on 30.01.1995. It was only in 2003, after he had filed O.A. No.385 of 1995 that in pursuance...

• Original Application No. 358/2007, Original Application No. 359/2007, Original Application No. 360/2007. Case: 1. Jagdish Prasad Raiger S/o Laxman Ram, Inspector, Income Tax, O/o Income Tax Commissioner-II, Jaipur, 2. Ramkesh Meena S/o Sarwan Lal Meena, Inspector, Income Tax, Office of ITO, Ward No.1, Sawaimadhopur, 3. Maliram Khanagwal S/o Nathu Lal Vs 1. Union of India, Through Secretary Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi, 2. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCIT) (Cadre Controlling Authority), New Central Revenue Building, Jaipur, 3. Commissioner, Income Tax, Jaipur -II, Jaipur, 4. Namo Narain Meena, Inspector, Income Tax, Office of Additional Commissioner, Range-I, Kota. Central Administrative Tribunal

  2. The controversy in the aforesaid OA is with regard to letter No. CC/JPR/Admn./Sen.-List/2007-08/564 dated 27.09.2007 wherein various seniority lists have been revised whereby the position of the applicant in the cadre of Senior Tax Assistant as on 01.01.2004 has been lower down and his name from ...

• OA No. 2072/2010, M.A. Nos. 1654/2010, 1655/2010 and 1656/2010. Case: 1. K. K. Chopra S/o Late Rooplal Chopra, 2. R. C. Mahato S/o Late M. Mahato, 3. Bhagwan Singh Rawat S/o Late R. S. Rawat, 4. Dhiraj Singh S/o Late Sodhar Singh, 5. Vinod Kumar S/o Late Roop Ram Vs 1. Union of India, Through its Secretary, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce, 2. Directorate General of Foreign Trade, New Delhi. Central Administrative Tribunal

  5 applicants, who are working as Search Attendants in the office of Chief Controller of Imports and & Exports (hereinafter referred to as CCI & E) have filed this OA claiming the following relief- "(a) Direct the respondents to place the applicants in the pay scale of Rs.330-480...