State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Court

Latest documents

• First Appeal No. FA/656/2014 (Arisen out of Order Dated 12/09/2013 in Case No. CC/105/S/2009 of District Siliguri). Case: Sujit Ranjan Sengupta Vs Rabindra Chandra Dey and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This Appeal u/s. 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been filed by the OP No. 1 challenging the judgment and order dated 12.9.2013 passed by the Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Siliguri, in Complaint Case No. 105/S/2009, directing the OP No. 1 to pay to the Complainant, within 45 days from the date of the order, Rs. 10,00...

• First Appeal No. A/160/2016 (Arisen out of Order Dated 28/01/2016 in Case No. CC/505/2015 of District North 24 Parganas). Case: Barun Kumar Ojha Vs LG Direct Service Centre and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. By this Appeal, Appellant/Complainant has challenged the Order dated 28-01-2016 passed by the Ld. District Forum, North 24 Parganas in C.C. No. 505/2015 whereby the complaint has been partly allowed. 2. In a short compass, case of the Complainant, is that, he purchased a mobile handset of M/s. LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. from the showroom of...

• Consumer Complaint Nos. 784 and 893 of 2016. Case: Surinder Singh Grewal and Ors Vs Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The facts, in brief, are that the complainant applied for a residential plot in the project of Opposite Party No. 1, namely 'IREO Hamlet', total price whereof was Rs. 56,80,310/-. Initially, the complainant paid Rs. 6,50,000/- alongwith the application for booking of a plot, to the Opposite Parties. Vide provisional allotment letter, the complai...

• Complaint Case No. CC/125/2011. Case: Ashok Kumar Todani Vs Rahul De and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The present Complaint has been filed u/s. 17(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Complainant, being a doctor, with the allegation of medical negligence against the OP No. 1-Doctor and the OP No. 2-Hospital along with a prayer for direction upon the OPs to pay to the Complainant Rs. 20,00,000/- as compensation for mental agony an...

• Complaint Case No. CC/333/2013. Case: Uttam Kumar Samanta Vs Vodafone India Ltd. and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The instant complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for brevity, 'the Act') is at the instance of the complainant against the opposite party Nos. 1 & 2 for deficiency in providing internet connection in respect of a post-paid internet service plan and against opposite party Nos. 3 to 5 for their failure for an effect...

• Consumer Complaint Nos. 974, 953, 958, 960, 975, 976, 979, 980, 981 of 2016, 51 and 54 of 2017. Case: Naresh Kumar and Ors. Vs DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  2. After hearing arguments on 27.03.2017, we were of the opinion that the facts and issues in law, involved in the above bunch of complaints, by and large, are the same, and therefore, the aforesaid 11 complaints can be disposed of, by passing one consolidated order. During arguments, Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties, pl...

• First Appeal No. A/36/2017. Case: Pushpendra Pratap Sharma Vs Holiday World. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T. Chandigarh (for short 'the Forum' only) vide order dated 10.1.2017 partly allowed consumer complaint bearing No. 856 of 2016 filed by the appellant/complainant, granting him an amount of Rs. 10,000/- towards compensation for mental and physical harassment and also Rs. 5000/- towards litigation e...

• Complaint Case No. 871 of 2016. Case: Vikram Wadhwa Vs Puma Realtors Private Limited and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. As per facts on record, the complainant wanted to purchase a flat, for his personal/family use, in the project of the opposite parties, launched by them, under the name and style 'IREO RISE', Sector 99, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Punjab. The complainant alongwith his friend, jointly moved an application, to purchase above unit, by making payment of Rs.

• First Appeal No. A/2/2016 (Arisen out of Order Dated 03/12/2015 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/127/2015 of District Kolkata-II(Central)). Case: Samir Dutta Vs Mamata Das and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 03.12.15 passed by Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata Unit-II, in CC/127/2015 wherein the Forum concerned while disposing of the complaint case allowed the same partly on admission and partly on contest with cost of Rs. 10,000/-. The Appellant/OP was directed...

• First Appeal No. 881 of 2016. Case: Shriram Fertilizers & Chemicals and Ors. Vs Gurmeet Singh. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The appellants have directed this appeal against order dated 07.10.2016 of District Consumer Forum Ferozepur, directing the appellants to pay Rs. 44,000/- along with interest @ 8% per annum from the date of complaint i.e. 1.1.2016 till realization, besides Rs. 8,000/- as compensation for mental harassment and Rs. 3,000/- as litigation expenses t...

Featured documents

• FA. 638/2011, F.A. 316/2009 & F.A. 132/2009. Case: 1. Managing Director, Travelon Worldwide Pvt. Ltd., 2. The Managing Director, Quantas, GSA Transworld Travels Pvt. Ltd., 3. The Managing Director, Indian Airlines, [now known as National Aviation Company of India Ltd.,], Chennai Vs 1. Dr. Mary Ramasamy, 2. Miss Niranjana Ramasamy, Rep. through her guardian and next friend her mother, Mary Ramasamy, 3. Miss Krupa Ruth Ramasamy, Rep. through her guardian and next friend, Her mother Mary Ramasamy, 4. The Managing Director, Quantas, 5. The Managing Director, Indian Airlines, (Along with F.A.683/2011), 6. Dr. Mary Ramasamy, 7. Miss Niranjana Ramasamy, Rep. through her guardian and next friend her mother, Mary Ramasamy, 8. Miss Krupa Ruth Ramasamy, Rep. through her guardian and next friend, Her mother Mary Ramasamy, 9. Managing Director, Travelon Worldwide Pvt. Ltd., 10. The Managing Director, Indian Airlines, (Along with F.A.316/2009), 11. Dr. Mary Ramasamy, 12. Miss Niranjana Ramasamy, Rep. through her guardian and next friend her mother, Mary Ramasamy, 13. .... Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  The complainants availing the service of the first opposite party-Travel Agent, booked 3 tickets for them, to Australia from Chennai and return also for husband / father, originally, paying a sum of Rs.99,350/-, then paying additional sum of Rs.4900/-. As per the itinerary, the complainants have to ...

• F.A. No. 992 of 2013. Case: Andhra Pradesh Rajiv Swagruha Corporation Vs A. Vikram Kumar. Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. A.P. Rajiv Swagruha Corporation is the appellant and this appeal is directed against the orders dated 3.6.2013 made in C.C. No. 3/2012 on the file of District Forum, Ranga Reddy District whereby the District Forum awarded interest at the rate of 18% p.a. as claimed by the complainant i.e....

• Consumer Complaint No. 148 of 2016. Case: Bal Krishan Verma Vs Premium Acre Infratech Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.. Union Territory State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. In brief, the facts of the case are that the Opposite Parties had launched the project of "TDI City" and the complainant was allured by the Opposite Parties, who depicted the magnanimous benefits of the said project. On believing the glorified benefit of the project of the Opposite...

• First Appeal No. A/397/2008, (Arisen out of Order Dated 02/07/2008 in Case No. CC/26/2007 of District Madhubani). Case: Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., Patna & another Vs Deepak Kumar Yadav.

  1. This appeal has been directed against the order dated 02-07-2008 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Madhubani in Consumer Complaint No. 26/2007 whereby and whereunder the learned District Forum has ordered the appellant-Branch Manager, National Insurance Company to ...

• Case: Datacore India Private Limited Vs The West Bengal State Co-operative Housing Federation Ltd. represented by Chief Executive Officer. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The present Revisional Application has been preferred against the Order No. 10 dt. 4.9.09 passed by Calcutta District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Unit-I, Kolkata-700 087 in Case No. 279 of 2008, wherein the Ld. District Forum did not uphold the prayer application filed by the Revisionist/O...

• First Appeal No. 414 of 2014. Case: Estate Officer Vs Parveen Sharma. Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant/opposite party No. 3 against the order dated 6.3.2014 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Patiala (in short, "District Forum"), vide which the complaint filed by the respondent/complainant, Dr. (Mrs.) Parveen Sharma,...

• First Appeal No. 75 of 2012. Case: ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Jeet Singh. Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This is insurer's appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 26.3.2012 passed by the District Forum, Tehri Garhwal in consumer complaint No. 03 of 2009. By the order impugned, the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and directed the...

• First Appeal No. 195 of 2014. Case: Kamaljit Singh Vs Broadway Auto Engineers. Union Territory State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 5.5.2014, rendered by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, UT, Chandigarh (hereinafter to be called as the District Forum only) vide which, it dismissed the complaint, filed by the complainant (now appellant). The facts, in brief, are...

• Appeal No. 2 of 2015. Case: LIC of India Vs Gopal Singh. Pondicherry State Consumer Forum SCDRC Cases

  1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed in Consumer Dispute No. 5 of 2013 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Port Blair (District Forum) on 31.12.2014, whereby the complaint was allowed directing the appellant - opposite party to pay back the entire amount...

• First Appeal No. 306/2010. Case: Manager, Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited and Ors. Vs Nitin Kashyap. Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This is an appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 06.09.2010 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar in consumer complaint No. 147 of 2009. By the order impugned, the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and directed the appellants -...