State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Jurisdiction/Issuing Court

Latest documents

• First Appeal No. FA/656/2014 (Arisen out of Order Dated 12/09/2013 in Case No. CC/105/S/2009 of District Siliguri). Case: Sujit Ranjan Sengupta Vs Rabindra Chandra Dey and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This Appeal u/s. 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been filed by the OP No. 1 challenging the judgment and order dated 12.9.2013 passed by the Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Siliguri, in Complaint Case No. 105/S/2009, directing the OP No. 1 to pay to the Complainant, within 45 days from the date of the order, Rs. 10,00...

• Consumer Complaint Nos. 784 and 893 of 2016. Case: Surinder Singh Grewal and Ors Vs Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The facts, in brief, are that the complainant applied for a residential plot in the project of Opposite Party No. 1, namely 'IREO Hamlet', total price whereof was Rs. 56,80,310/-. Initially, the complainant paid Rs. 6,50,000/- alongwith the application for booking of a plot, to the Opposite Parties. Vide provisional allotment letter, the complai...

• Complaint Case No. CC/125/2011. Case: Ashok Kumar Todani Vs Rahul De and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The present Complaint has been filed u/s. 17(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Complainant, being a doctor, with the allegation of medical negligence against the OP No. 1-Doctor and the OP No. 2-Hospital along with a prayer for direction upon the OPs to pay to the Complainant Rs. 20,00,000/- as compensation for mental agony an...

• First Appeal No. A/160/2016 (Arisen out of Order Dated 28/01/2016 in Case No. CC/505/2015 of District North 24 Parganas). Case: Barun Kumar Ojha Vs LG Direct Service Centre and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. By this Appeal, Appellant/Complainant has challenged the Order dated 28-01-2016 passed by the Ld. District Forum, North 24 Parganas in C.C. No. 505/2015 whereby the complaint has been partly allowed. 2. In a short compass, case of the Complainant, is that, he purchased a mobile handset of M/s. LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. from the showroom of...

• Consumer Complaint Nos. 974, 953, 958, 960, 975, 976, 979, 980, 981 of 2016, 51 and 54 of 2017. Case: Naresh Kumar and Ors. Vs DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  2. After hearing arguments on 27.03.2017, we were of the opinion that the facts and issues in law, involved in the above bunch of complaints, by and large, are the same, and therefore, the aforesaid 11 complaints can be disposed of, by passing one consolidated order. During arguments, Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties, pl...

• First Appeal No. A/36/2017. Case: Pushpendra Pratap Sharma Vs Holiday World. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T. Chandigarh (for short 'the Forum' only) vide order dated 10.1.2017 partly allowed consumer complaint bearing No. 856 of 2016 filed by the appellant/complainant, granting him an amount of Rs. 10,000/- towards compensation for mental and physical harassment and also Rs. 5000/- towards litigation e...

• Complaint Case No. 871 of 2016. Case: Vikram Wadhwa Vs Puma Realtors Private Limited and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. As per facts on record, the complainant wanted to purchase a flat, for his personal/family use, in the project of the opposite parties, launched by them, under the name and style 'IREO RISE', Sector 99, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Punjab. The complainant alongwith his friend, jointly moved an application, to purchase above unit, by making payment of Rs.

• Complaint Case No. CC/333/2013. Case: Uttam Kumar Samanta Vs Vodafone India Ltd. and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The instant complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for brevity, 'the Act') is at the instance of the complainant against the opposite party Nos. 1 & 2 for deficiency in providing internet connection in respect of a post-paid internet service plan and against opposite party Nos. 3 to 5 for their failure for an effect...

• First Appeal No. A/2/2016 (Arisen out of Order Dated 03/12/2015 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/127/2015 of District Kolkata-II(Central)). Case: Samir Dutta Vs Mamata Das and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 03.12.15 passed by Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata Unit-II, in CC/127/2015 wherein the Forum concerned while disposing of the complaint case allowed the same partly on admission and partly on contest with cost of Rs. 10,000/-. The Appellant/OP was directed...

• Complaint Case No. SC/07/O/2007. Case: Pandav Roy and Ors. Vs Merlin Projects Ltd. and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The instant complaint under Section 17 (wrongly mentioned U/s. 12A) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for brevity, "the Act") is at the instance of intending purchasers against the developer and its Manager (OP Nos. 1 and 2 respectively) and also against the Financer Bank (OP No. 3) on the allegation of deficiency in services on the part of them...

Featured documents

• FA/108/2010. Case: 1. The Divisional Manager National Insurance Co. Ltd., 2. The Branch Manager National Insurance Co. Ltd. Raiganj Branch, Mohanbati Vs 1. Sumanta @ Sumantra Paul S/o Late Basanta Paul, 2. The Manager Golden Trust Financial Services Raiganj Branch, Mohanbati. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  The present Appeal has been directed against the judgement and order dt. 31.12.09 passed by Uttar Dinajpur District Consumer Forum at Raiganj in Consumer Case No. 44/2009 wherein the Ld. District Forum allowed the petition of complaint ex parte with cost against the Ops/Appellants/ Insurance...

• Consumer Complaint No. 555 of 2016. Case: Asha Viz Vs Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.. Union Territory State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The facts, in brief, are that on the assurance given by the Opposite Parties through various newspapers and advertisements that the development activity at the site of their project namely 'IREO HamLET', in Sector 98, SAS Nagar, Mohali, was in full swing and possession of the plot would be...

• Appeal Case Nos. F.A.-26 and F.A.-31 of 2014. Case: Bibhas Ranjan Bhattacharjee Vs Goutam Debnath. Tripura State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. F.A.-26/14 and F.A-31/14 have arisen out of the same judgment and order dated 13.8.2014 passed in case No. C.C-01/14 and as such both the appeals have been heard together and are liable to be disposed of by this common judgment. The case of the appellant-Bibhas Ranjan Bhattacharjee as described...

• First Appeal No. 131 of 2014. Case: Charanjit Singh Vs Satluj Motors. Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. Present appeal is directed against the order dated 06.03.2014, of learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Una, whereby the complaint of the appellant, which he filed against the respondents, has been ordered to be returned for lack of territorial jurisdiction. Appellant purchased a...

• First Appeal No. A/306/2008, (Arisen out of Order Dated 08/02/2008 in Case No. CC/85/2005 of District Samastipur). Case: Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., Kolkatta & another Vs Smt. Sunila Devi.

  1. This appeal has been directed against the order dated 08-02-2008 passed in Consumer Complaint No. 85/2005 by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Samastipur (hereinafter to be referred to as District Forum) whereby and whereunder the appellant-National Insurance Company, who...

• First Appeal No. A/1112/2014 (Arisen out of Order Dated 31/07/2014 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/36/2013 of District Kolkata-II (Central)). Case: Go Airlines (India) Ltd. and Ors. Vs Amit Kumar Ghosh and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The Appeal originates out of the order dated 31-07-2014 passed by the Ld. District Forum, Kolkata, Unit II in C.C. No. 36/2013. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the same, Complainants thereof have filed this Appeal. 2. Case of the Complainant, in short, is that he booked an air ticket...

• Remand Complaint No. 35 of 2013. Case: Indo Phytochem Pharmaceuticals Vs National Insurance Company Ltd. and Ors.. Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This complaint has been received by remand in view of the order dated 14.5.2013 passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in Revision Petition No. 779 of 2012. Complainant being a partnership concern having its registered office at Village Rampur Jattan, Nahan...

• O.P. No. 6 of 2004. Case: Kokila Samuthiram Vs Malar Hospitals. Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  The complainant is the wife of the deceased Su. Samuthiram, a well known Tamil writer who was retired Joint Director, Publicity, Government of India. He met with a road accident on 31.3.2003 at about 12.30 p.m. involving a bus, at Adyar, and he was taken to the nearby opposite party hospital around ...

• First Appeal No. A/10/450 (Arisen out of Order Dated 10/03/2010 in Case No. CC/09/211 of District Kasaragod). Case: M.Maheendran, S/o Chandan Mesthri Vs Mrs. Prameela Kalidasan, W/o P.C.Kalidasan. Kerala State State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. Appellant is the opposite party/contractor in CC.211/09 in the file of CDRF Kasargod. The appellant is under orders to pay a sum of Rs.2,25,000/- and compensation of Rs.25000/- and cost of Rs.7000/-. The appellant was exparte in the proceedings before the Forum. 2. It is the case of the...

• Miscellaneous Application No. MA/364/2015 in Complaint Case No. CC/414 of 2014. Case: Marooti Filling Station Vs Galaxy Outdoor Advertising Solutions Pvt. Ltd.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  By such petition, it is stated by the OP No. 4 that the instant complaint is not maintainable for the simple fact that the Complainant is not a 'consumer' as per provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. In this case, the Complainant is a Private Limited Company and the commercial activities ...