State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Court

Latest documents

• First Appeal No. FA/656/2014 (Arisen out of Order Dated 12/09/2013 in Case No. CC/105/S/2009 of District Siliguri). Case: Sujit Ranjan Sengupta Vs Rabindra Chandra Dey and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This Appeal u/s. 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been filed by the OP No. 1 challenging the judgment and order dated 12.9.2013 passed by the Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Siliguri, in Complaint Case No. 105/S/2009, directing the OP No. 1 to pay to the Complainant, within 45 days from the date of the order, Rs. 10,00...

• First Appeal No. A/160/2016 (Arisen out of Order Dated 28/01/2016 in Case No. CC/505/2015 of District North 24 Parganas). Case: Barun Kumar Ojha Vs LG Direct Service Centre and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. By this Appeal, Appellant/Complainant has challenged the Order dated 28-01-2016 passed by the Ld. District Forum, North 24 Parganas in C.C. No. 505/2015 whereby the complaint has been partly allowed. 2. In a short compass, case of the Complainant, is that, he purchased a mobile handset of M/s. LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. from the showroom of...

• Consumer Complaint Nos. 784 and 893 of 2016. Case: Surinder Singh Grewal and Ors Vs Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The facts, in brief, are that the complainant applied for a residential plot in the project of Opposite Party No. 1, namely 'IREO Hamlet', total price whereof was Rs. 56,80,310/-. Initially, the complainant paid Rs. 6,50,000/- alongwith the application for booking of a plot, to the Opposite Parties. Vide provisional allotment letter, the complai...

• Complaint Case No. CC/125/2011. Case: Ashok Kumar Todani Vs Rahul De and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The present Complaint has been filed u/s. 17(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Complainant, being a doctor, with the allegation of medical negligence against the OP No. 1-Doctor and the OP No. 2-Hospital along with a prayer for direction upon the OPs to pay to the Complainant Rs. 20,00,000/- as compensation for mental agony an...

• Complaint Case No. 871 of 2016. Case: Vikram Wadhwa Vs Puma Realtors Private Limited and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. As per facts on record, the complainant wanted to purchase a flat, for his personal/family use, in the project of the opposite parties, launched by them, under the name and style 'IREO RISE', Sector 99, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Punjab. The complainant alongwith his friend, jointly moved an application, to purchase above unit, by making payment of Rs.

• Complaint Case No. CC/333/2013. Case: Uttam Kumar Samanta Vs Vodafone India Ltd. and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The instant complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for brevity, 'the Act') is at the instance of the complainant against the opposite party Nos. 1 & 2 for deficiency in providing internet connection in respect of a post-paid internet service plan and against opposite party Nos. 3 to 5 for their failure for an effect...

• Consumer Complaint Nos. 974, 953, 958, 960, 975, 976, 979, 980, 981 of 2016, 51 and 54 of 2017. Case: Naresh Kumar and Ors. Vs DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  2. After hearing arguments on 27.03.2017, we were of the opinion that the facts and issues in law, involved in the above bunch of complaints, by and large, are the same, and therefore, the aforesaid 11 complaints can be disposed of, by passing one consolidated order. During arguments, Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties, pl...

• First Appeal No. A/36/2017. Case: Pushpendra Pratap Sharma Vs Holiday World. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T. Chandigarh (for short 'the Forum' only) vide order dated 10.1.2017 partly allowed consumer complaint bearing No. 856 of 2016 filed by the appellant/complainant, granting him an amount of Rs. 10,000/- towards compensation for mental and physical harassment and also Rs. 5000/- towards litigation e...

• First Appeal No. A/2/2016 (Arisen out of Order Dated 03/12/2015 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/127/2015 of District Kolkata-II(Central)). Case: Samir Dutta Vs Mamata Das and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 03.12.15 passed by Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata Unit-II, in CC/127/2015 wherein the Forum concerned while disposing of the complaint case allowed the same partly on admission and partly on contest with cost of Rs. 10,000/-. The Appellant/OP was directed...

• Complaint Case No. SC/07/O/2007. Case: Pandav Roy and Ors. Vs Merlin Projects Ltd. and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The instant complaint under Section 17 (wrongly mentioned U/s. 12A) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for brevity, "the Act") is at the instance of intending purchasers against the developer and its Manager (OP Nos. 1 and 2 respectively) and also against the Financer Bank (OP No. 3) on the allegation of deficiency in services on the part of them...

Featured documents

• R.B.T. No.1401 of 2008 in Appeal No.1461 of 2002. Case: 1. Haryana Urban Development Authority, through its Chief Administrator, 2. The Administrator, HUDA, Hisar, 3. The Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Hisar Vs Sh. Dharam Singh, Proprietor of M/s Dharam Saw and General Mill. Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This is OPs'' appeal under section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 20.5.2002, passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hisar (hereinafter referred to as District Forum), allowing the complaint and quashing the letter of offer of possession ...

• First Appeal No. 490 of 2012. Case: Agriculture Insurance Company of India Ltd. Vs Shyamal Poddar. Orissa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 28.6.2012 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Malkangiri (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in CC. No. 254 of 2011 directing the appellant to consider the claim of respondent No. 1 afresh by taking recourse to ...

• Appeal No. 19/1999. Case: Asst. Secretary Life Insurance Corporation of India & Anr. Vs Ahmedabad Grahak Suraksha Sangh & Anr..

  "The opponents jointly and severally are directed to pay to the complainant No.2, the interest at the rate of 18% per annum from 1-6-95 to 17-2­-98 on the amount of Rs. 1,03,350/- and La pay the cost the Rs. 5,000/- to the complainant No.1 and to pay the cost of Rs. 5, 000/- to the complainant ...

• FA No. 121 of 2013. Case: Blue Moon Communications and Credit Pvt. Ltd. Vs Thomas Mathew. Goa State State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This appeal has been filed by the OP in CC No. 109/2010, and, is directed against order dated 11.11.2013 by which the OP has been directed to refund the sum of Rs. 1 lac with interest at the rate of 9% from 18.11.10 till payment and the complainant has been directed to return the furniture, on...

• First Appeal No. A/343/2016. Case: Country Club (India) Ltd. Vs Sanjana Kaundal. Union Territory State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. Appellant/Opposite Party has filed this appeal against order dated 29.9.2016 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh (in short 'the Forum' only), allowing a complaint filed by respondent/complainant. 2. Before the Forum, it was case of the complainant that...

• First Appeal No. 265/2011. Case: Dwarika Prasad Dobhal Vs State Bank of India and Ors.. Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This is complainant's appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 22.11.2011 passed by the District Forum, Uttarkashi in consumer complaint No. 44 of 2008. By the order impugned, the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint against the opposite...

• F.A. No. 261 of 2012. Case: ICFAI National College Vs S. Ashok Kumar. Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This appeal is filed by the opposite parties against the order of the District Forum, Tiruchirappalli, in C.C. No. 08/2010, dated 18.1.2011, allowing the complaint The case of the complainant is that the 1st opposite party college was functioning without proper recognition and without the...

• First Appeal No. 359 of 2012. Case: Jugnu Dhillon Vs Reliance Digital Retail Ltd. and Ors.. Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 22.2.2012 passed in Complaint Case No. 570/10 by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (East) Saini Enclave, Delhi-92. Facts of the case are that on 25.2.2010 complainant/appellant purchased from respondent-1/OP-1 two air...

• Complaint Case No. 760 of 2016. Case: Lalit Gulati Vs Puma Realtors Private Limited and Ors.. Union Territory State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The facts, in brief, are that allured by numerous advertisements in various newspapers and assurances, the complainant applied for allotment of a residential plot in the project of the Opposite Parties namely, 'IREO HAMLET' in Sector 98, SAS Nagar, Mohali. A Plot Buyer's Agreement was executed...

• Complaint Case No. CC/11/268. Case: M/s. Tools International Vs Ramnik Lal Jetha Lal Shah. Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. Heard Mr. Jakatdar, Advocate for Complainant thor­oughly to his satisfaction, This complaint has been filed by M/s Tools International, a partnership firm dealing in the business of importing and trading in industrial machin­ery. In order to carry out the said business, industrial machinery...