State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Jurisdiction/Issuing Court

Latest documents

• First Appeal No. FA/656/2014 (Arisen out of Order Dated 12/09/2013 in Case No. CC/105/S/2009 of District Siliguri). Case: Sujit Ranjan Sengupta Vs Rabindra Chandra Dey and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This Appeal u/s. 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been filed by the OP No. 1 challenging the judgment and order dated 12.9.2013 passed by the Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Siliguri, in Complaint Case No. 105/S/2009, directing the OP No. 1 to pay to the Complainant, within 45 days from the date of the order, Rs. 10,00...

• Consumer Complaint Nos. 784 and 893 of 2016. Case: Surinder Singh Grewal and Ors Vs Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The facts, in brief, are that the complainant applied for a residential plot in the project of Opposite Party No. 1, namely 'IREO Hamlet', total price whereof was Rs. 56,80,310/-. Initially, the complainant paid Rs. 6,50,000/- alongwith the application for booking of a plot, to the Opposite Parties. Vide provisional allotment letter, the complai...

• Complaint Case No. CC/125/2011. Case: Ashok Kumar Todani Vs Rahul De and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The present Complaint has been filed u/s. 17(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Complainant, being a doctor, with the allegation of medical negligence against the OP No. 1-Doctor and the OP No. 2-Hospital along with a prayer for direction upon the OPs to pay to the Complainant Rs. 20,00,000/- as compensation for mental agony an...

• First Appeal No. A/160/2016 (Arisen out of Order Dated 28/01/2016 in Case No. CC/505/2015 of District North 24 Parganas). Case: Barun Kumar Ojha Vs LG Direct Service Centre and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. By this Appeal, Appellant/Complainant has challenged the Order dated 28-01-2016 passed by the Ld. District Forum, North 24 Parganas in C.C. No. 505/2015 whereby the complaint has been partly allowed. 2. In a short compass, case of the Complainant, is that, he purchased a mobile handset of M/s. LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. from the showroom of...

• Consumer Complaint Nos. 974, 953, 958, 960, 975, 976, 979, 980, 981 of 2016, 51 and 54 of 2017. Case: Naresh Kumar and Ors. Vs DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  2. After hearing arguments on 27.03.2017, we were of the opinion that the facts and issues in law, involved in the above bunch of complaints, by and large, are the same, and therefore, the aforesaid 11 complaints can be disposed of, by passing one consolidated order. During arguments, Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties, pl...

• First Appeal No. A/36/2017. Case: Pushpendra Pratap Sharma Vs Holiday World. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T. Chandigarh (for short 'the Forum' only) vide order dated 10.1.2017 partly allowed consumer complaint bearing No. 856 of 2016 filed by the appellant/complainant, granting him an amount of Rs. 10,000/- towards compensation for mental and physical harassment and also Rs. 5000/- towards litigation e...

• Complaint Case No. 871 of 2016. Case: Vikram Wadhwa Vs Puma Realtors Private Limited and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. As per facts on record, the complainant wanted to purchase a flat, for his personal/family use, in the project of the opposite parties, launched by them, under the name and style 'IREO RISE', Sector 99, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Punjab. The complainant alongwith his friend, jointly moved an application, to purchase above unit, by making payment of Rs.

• Complaint Case No. CC/333/2013. Case: Uttam Kumar Samanta Vs Vodafone India Ltd. and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The instant complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for brevity, 'the Act') is at the instance of the complainant against the opposite party Nos. 1 & 2 for deficiency in providing internet connection in respect of a post-paid internet service plan and against opposite party Nos. 3 to 5 for their failure for an effect...

• First Appeal No. A/2/2016 (Arisen out of Order Dated 03/12/2015 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/127/2015 of District Kolkata-II(Central)). Case: Samir Dutta Vs Mamata Das and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 03.12.15 passed by Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata Unit-II, in CC/127/2015 wherein the Forum concerned while disposing of the complaint case allowed the same partly on admission and partly on contest with cost of Rs. 10,000/-. The Appellant/OP was directed...

• First Appeal Nos. 880 and 920 of 2016. Case: Shriram Fertilizers & Chemicals and Ors. Vs Rajinder Singh and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. By this common judgment, we intend to dispose of the above- referred two first appeals, as they have arisen out of the same order dated 07.10.2016 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ferozepur and, thus, can be disposed of together. The order shall be pronounced by us in main First Appeal No. 880 of 2016 titled as "M/s. Shriram Fertili...

Featured documents

• First Appeal No. A/10/922 (Arisen out of Order Dated 11/05/2010 in Case No. 78/07 of District Satara) and First Appeal No. A/10/923 (Arisen out of Order Dated 11/05/2010 in Case No. 79/07 of District Satara). Case: 1. Swati Shrinivas Wathare, 2. Shrinivas Purushottam Wathare Vs Chanakya Construction, Through Its Proprietor, Vikram Vijay Gosavi, Maharashtra. Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. These two appeals have been filed against the order passed on Application at Exhibit-69 by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, District Satara, dated 11.05.2009 whereby the District Forum was pleased to dismiss the said application at Exhibit-69 filed by appellant and also disposed of...

• FA/205/2009. Case: AS & AK Timber Co. Vs The Senior Manager, Syndicate Bank. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  The present Appeal has been directed against the judgement and order dt. 31.3.09 passed by the Ld. District Consumer Forum, South 24 Parganas in C.C. Case No. 70 of 2009 wherein the Ld. District Forum dismissed the petition of complaint thereby giving liberty to the complainant to file appropriate...

• First Appeal No. 736 of 2012. Case: Bhubaneswar Development Authority Vs Brahmananda Hota. Orissa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The appellant calls in question the order dated 11.4.2012 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Khurda at Bhubaneswar (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in C.D. Case No. 614 of 2007 wherein it directed the appellant to allot a MIG housing plot in favour of...

• F.A. No. 38 of 2014. Case: Casa Bhat Vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd.. Goa State State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. A Consumer complaint filed by the Complainant on 16.9.2003 to recover from the OP, the insurer, a sum of Rs. 3,87,637 with interest @ 21% p.a. came to be dismissed by order dated 28.3.2014, and, hence the present appeal. Notice of this appeal was given to the respondent, the insurer, who was...

• First Appeal No. A/12/781. Case: Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway Vs P.J. Kurian. Kerala State State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This is an appeal filed by the opposite parties, Railways in CC. 74/12 on the file of CDRF, Alappuzha challenging the order of the Forum dated June 22, 2012 directing the opposite parties to refund the ticket charge of Rs. 291 and to pay a compensation of Rs. 50,000 and a cost of Rs. 2,000 The...

• First Appeal No. 261 of 2011. Case: Gianpal Anand Vs Yamin and Ors.. Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The appellant of this appeal (the complainant in the complaint) has directed this appeal against the respondents of this appeal (the opposite parties in the complaint), challenging order dated 5.1.2011 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ludhiana, dismissing the complaint of the...

• First Appeal No. 29 of 2012. Case: Indian Postal Department and Anr. Vs Amit Srivastava. Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This appeal, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is directed against the order dated 27.1.2012 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar, in consumer complaint No. 207 of 2011, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and has directed the opposite parties to...

• First Appeal No. 217 of 2010 in Complaint Case No. 44 of 2009. Case: Kirti Agrotech Limited Vs Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. and Ors.. Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  Complainant Kirti Agrotech Ltd. is a consumer of MSEDCL. Opponents 1 and 2 are the engineers of MSEDCL and opponent No. 3 is the Managing Director of MSEDCL. Opponent No. 4 is also a engineer who is appointed as the head of the flying squad which was formed by MSEDCL. According to complainant it...

• O. P. No. 127 of 1991. Case: M.K.S. Balasubramanian Vs Jayalakshmi Planners - 06 Dec 1991.

  2. The brief facts of the case of the com­plaint are these: The opposite party is a builder of flats. It allotted a flat on the first floor in the complex to be constructed at Thiruvenkadam Street, West Mambalam to the complainant at the rate of Rs. 312/'- per sq. ft. The complainant paid Rs. 20,000...

• First Appeal No. 178 of 2014. Case: Markanda Auto Agency Vs Jasvinder Singh. Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. Jasvinder Singh-respondent (complainant) purchased a motorcycle of Bajaj Platina make bearing Chassis No. MD2DDDZZZ UPC-79617 Engine No. DZUBUC 84445 from 'Markanda Auto Agency, Shahabad (M) -opposite party No. 1, District Kurukshetra, authorized dealer of Bajaj Auto Limited-opposite party No. 2,...