State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Court

Latest documents

• First Appeal No. FA/656/2014 (Arisen out of Order Dated 12/09/2013 in Case No. CC/105/S/2009 of District Siliguri). Case: Sujit Ranjan Sengupta Vs Rabindra Chandra Dey and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This Appeal u/s. 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been filed by the OP No. 1 challenging the judgment and order dated 12.9.2013 passed by the Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Siliguri, in Complaint Case No. 105/S/2009, directing the OP No. 1 to pay to the Complainant, within 45 days from the date of the order, Rs. 10,00...

• First Appeal No. A/160/2016 (Arisen out of Order Dated 28/01/2016 in Case No. CC/505/2015 of District North 24 Parganas). Case: Barun Kumar Ojha Vs LG Direct Service Centre and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. By this Appeal, Appellant/Complainant has challenged the Order dated 28-01-2016 passed by the Ld. District Forum, North 24 Parganas in C.C. No. 505/2015 whereby the complaint has been partly allowed. 2. In a short compass, case of the Complainant, is that, he purchased a mobile handset of M/s. LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. from the showroom of...

• Consumer Complaint Nos. 784 and 893 of 2016. Case: Surinder Singh Grewal and Ors Vs Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The facts, in brief, are that the complainant applied for a residential plot in the project of Opposite Party No. 1, namely 'IREO Hamlet', total price whereof was Rs. 56,80,310/-. Initially, the complainant paid Rs. 6,50,000/- alongwith the application for booking of a plot, to the Opposite Parties. Vide provisional allotment letter, the complai...

• Complaint Case No. CC/125/2011. Case: Ashok Kumar Todani Vs Rahul De and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The present Complaint has been filed u/s. 17(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Complainant, being a doctor, with the allegation of medical negligence against the OP No. 1-Doctor and the OP No. 2-Hospital along with a prayer for direction upon the OPs to pay to the Complainant Rs. 20,00,000/- as compensation for mental agony an...

• Consumer Complaint Nos. 974, 953, 958, 960, 975, 976, 979, 980, 981 of 2016, 51 and 54 of 2017. Case: Naresh Kumar and Ors. Vs DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  2. After hearing arguments on 27.03.2017, we were of the opinion that the facts and issues in law, involved in the above bunch of complaints, by and large, are the same, and therefore, the aforesaid 11 complaints can be disposed of, by passing one consolidated order. During arguments, Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties, pl...

• First Appeal No. A/36/2017. Case: Pushpendra Pratap Sharma Vs Holiday World. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T. Chandigarh (for short 'the Forum' only) vide order dated 10.1.2017 partly allowed consumer complaint bearing No. 856 of 2016 filed by the appellant/complainant, granting him an amount of Rs. 10,000/- towards compensation for mental and physical harassment and also Rs. 5000/- towards litigation e...

• Complaint Case No. 871 of 2016. Case: Vikram Wadhwa Vs Puma Realtors Private Limited and Ors.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. As per facts on record, the complainant wanted to purchase a flat, for his personal/family use, in the project of the opposite parties, launched by them, under the name and style 'IREO RISE', Sector 99, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Punjab. The complainant alongwith his friend, jointly moved an application, to purchase above unit, by making payment of Rs.

• Complaint Case No. CC/333/2013. Case: Uttam Kumar Samanta Vs Vodafone India Ltd. and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The instant complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for brevity, 'the Act') is at the instance of the complainant against the opposite party Nos. 1 & 2 for deficiency in providing internet connection in respect of a post-paid internet service plan and against opposite party Nos. 3 to 5 for their failure for an effect...

• First Appeal No. A/2/2016 (Arisen out of Order Dated 03/12/2015 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/127/2015 of District Kolkata-II(Central)). Case: Samir Dutta Vs Mamata Das and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 03.12.15 passed by Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata Unit-II, in CC/127/2015 wherein the Forum concerned while disposing of the complaint case allowed the same partly on admission and partly on contest with cost of Rs. 10,000/-. The Appellant/OP was directed...

• First Appeal No. 881 of 2016. Case: Shriram Fertilizers & Chemicals and Ors. Vs Gurmeet Singh. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The appellants have directed this appeal against order dated 07.10.2016 of District Consumer Forum Ferozepur, directing the appellants to pay Rs. 44,000/- along with interest @ 8% per annum from the date of complaint i.e. 1.1.2016 till realization, besides Rs. 8,000/- as compensation for mental harassment and Rs. 3,000/- as litigation expenses t...

Featured documents

• FA No: 269 of 2010. Case: 1. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., 2. The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Vs 1. Smt. Latika Banerjee, 2. Golden Trust Financial Services. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  Appellant through Mr. P. Banerjee, the Ld. Advocate and Respondent No. 2 through Mr. B. Mondal, the Ld. Advocate are present. The application for condonation of delay is taken up for hearing. Heard the Ld. Advocate for both sides. It is submitted on behalf of the Appellant - Petitioner that there...

• First Appeal No. 233/2011. Case: Apollo Tyres Ltd. Vs Virk International Trading Company and Ors.. Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This is an appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, filed by the appellant-opposite party No. 3 against the order dated 10.10.2011 passed by the District Forum, Udhamsingh Nagar in consumer complaint No. 85 of 2009. By the impugned order, the District Forum has allowed the...

• First Appeal No. A/160/2016 (Arisen out of Order Dated 28/01/2016 in Case No. CC/505/2015 of District North 24 Parganas). Case: Barun Kumar Ojha Vs LG Direct Service Centre and Ors.. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. By this Appeal, Appellant/Complainant has challenged the Order dated 28-01-2016 passed by the Ld. District Forum, North 24 Parganas in C.C. No. 505/2015 whereby the complaint has been partly allowed. 2. In a short compass, case of the Complainant, is that, he purchased a mobile handset of M/s....

• Appeal No. 961 of 2012. Case: Brindavan Electricals Vs Shivabasav. Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The above appeal is preferred against the order dated 29.3.2012 passed in C.C. No. 120/2011 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bagalkot. For the sake of convenience the parties herein are referred to by their respective rank as arrayed before the District Forum. 2. The...

• Consumer Complaint Case No.55 of 2010. Case: Deepak Kumar Parida Vs 1. Branch Manager, Magma Fincorp Ltd., 2. Regional Transport Authority, Bhubaneswar. Orissa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This is a consumer complaint under section 17 of the C.P. Act, 1986 filed by the complainant Deepak Kumar Parida alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties and adoption of unfair trade practice by them and claiming price of the hire purchase vehicle, which is the subject-m...

• First Appeal No. A/420/2007, (Arisen out of Order Dated 21/03/2007 in Case No. CC/199/2000 of District Patna). Case: Force Motors Ltd., (Formerly known as Bajaj Tempo Ltd.) Vs Dr. S.N. Upadhyay, Secretary, Bihar Blind Peoples Care Society.

  1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 21-03-2007 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Patna (hereinafter to be referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint No. 199/2000 wherein it was directed to the Opposite Parties/ A.P. Auto Sales, the authorized...

• Frist Appeal No. 850 of 2014. Case: IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Balwan Singh. Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. There is a delay of 402 days in filing the appeal, wherein it is alleged by the appellant that impugned order dated 4.7.2013 came to its notice on 5.9.2014 when the bailable warrants issued by District Forum, Rewari for 12.9.2014 were received at the office. While initiating ex parte proceedings ...

• First Appeal Nos. 162 and 12/2013. Case: Kasimuddin Vs Shiv Prakash. Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. These two appeals, one by the opposite party and another by the complainant, filed under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, arise out of the order dated 15.10.2012 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun in consumer complaint No. 211 of 2010, whereby the District Forum has partly...

• First Appeal No. A/11/439. Case: Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs Nina Sunil Rane. Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. This appeal takes an exception to an order dated 24.3.2011 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mumbai Suburban in Consumer Case No. 200/2008. Facts leading to this appeal can be summarized as under: Complainant had availed an Insurance Policy termed as "Jeevan Aadhar&q...

• Complaint Case No. 12/09. Case: Manish Gupta Vs National Insurance Company Ltd.. Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

  1. The complainant filed this consumer complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the O.P. seeking direction to the O.P. to pay insured amount Rs. 92,25,000, interest Rs. 4,60,750, Rs. 1,18,000 paid as rent, compensation for mental agony Rs. 1,00,000, cost of litigation ...