A Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction

Updated atMarch 2010

IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION,................

AT................

Civil Suit No.__________________________________________________ /200___

Shri ASR __.{Full Name)_____________)

age....... years, occupation -....................,) Plaintiff

Address................................................................)

Versus

  1. Shri ABR __(Full Name)_______)

    age....... years, occupation -....................,) Defendants

  2. The State of Maharashtra)

    A SUIT FOR DECLARATION & PERMANENT INJUNCTION

    The plaintiff abovenamed submits this plaint, praying to state as follows:

  3. Suit Properties : All those pieces and parcels of lands situate within the Registration Division & District................, Sub-Division & Taluka Haveli, within the local limits of the................ Zilla Parishad, revenue village..................., as detailed below:

    (A) Gat No. 195/2, admeasuring 45 acres or thereabouts, and bounded by:

    On or towards the East _ Gat No. 195/7,On or towards the South _ Gat No. 200,On or towards the West _ Public Road, andOn or towards the North Nullah.

    (B) Gat No. 196, admeasuring 55 acres or thereabouts, andbounded by:

    On or towards the East _ Gat No. 197, On or towards the South _ Gat No. 201, On or towards the West _ Gat No. 202, and On or towards the North _ Public Road.

    (C) Gat No. 200, admeasuring 47 acres or thereabouts, andbounded by:

    On or towards the East_ Gat No. 205, On or towards the South _ Gat No. 211, On or towards the West _ Public Road, and On or towards the North_ Nullah.

  4. That the said lands had been given to the share of the present plaintiff in partition effected on, and since the, the plaintiff has been possession and enjoying the said properties as his exclusive properties, and there is abundant evidence to establish that the present plaintiff is in actual possession and enjoyment of the said properties since the said partition, dated.

  5. That, however, it appears on________, the defendant No. 1 filed his return under the provisions of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity as the "said act". The Special Deputy Collector,........... Division, started an enquiry into the holdings of the defendant No. 1, case No. MLS/ME/100, and by his judgment and order, dated, held that the total holding with the defendant No. 1 as on was 147 acres and 6.............

  6. That it was also held by the said officer that the defendant No. 1 was the only...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT