Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

Latest documents

• Petition No. 319/GT/2014. Case: NTPC Ltd Vs Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 12/MP/2017. Case: Gurgaon Palwal Transmission Limited and Ors. Vs U.P. Power Corporation Limited and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The first petitioner herein, Gurgaon Palwal Transmission Limited, has been granted transmission licence under Section 14 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") to transmit electricity as a transmission licensee and for that purpose to undertake the business of establishing transmission system for "creation of new 400...

• Petition No. 336/GT/2014. Case: NTPC Limited Vs Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 157/MP/2015. Case: Coastal Gujarat Power Limited Vs Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The petitioner, Coastal Gujarat Power Limited, a subsidiary of Tata Power Company Ltd. has set up a 4000 MW Ultra Mega Power Project at Mundra in the State of Gujarat (Mundra UMPP) based on imported coal after Tata Power Company Ltd. was selected as the successful bidder based on the competitive bidding carried out in accordance with Section 63

• Petition No. 144/GT/2015. Case: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs BSES-Rajdhani Power Ltd. and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 449/MP/2014. Case: Malana Power Company Limited Vs Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The Petitioner in Petition No. 449/MP/2015 is Malana Power Company Ltd. (MPCL), a generating company which has constructed a Run of the River with Pondage Hydroelectric Power Project with an installed capacity of 86 MW (2 x 23MW) on Malana Nallah, a glacier fed tributary of Parbati River in Kullu District of Himachal Pradesh. MPCL entered into a...

• Petition No. 266/GT/2014. Case: Aravali Power Company Private Limited Vs Haryana Power Purchase Centre and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 16/MP/2016. Case: Sasan Power Limited Vs M.P. Power Management Company Ltd. and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The petitioner, Sasan Power Limited, has set up a 4000 MW super critical Ultra Mega power Project based on linked captive coal mine at Sasan, District: Singauli, in he State of Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as "Sasan UMPP"). 2. The petitioner has filed the present petition under clauses (b) and (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 79 of

• Petition No. 180/GT/2015. Case: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs Delhi Transco Limited and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 115/GT/2015. Case: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

Featured documents

• Petition Nos. 168, 178 and 194/MP/2011 with I.A. Nos. 39, 44 and 46/2012. Case: 1. Northern Regional Load Despatch Centre, New Delhi, 2. Southern Regional Load Despatch Centre, Bangalore, 3. Western Regional Load Despatch Centre, Mumbai Vs 1. Uttar Pradesh State Load Despatch Centre, Lucknow and Ors., 2. Ramagundam STG I & II, NTPC, RSTPS, Karim Nagar, Andhra Pradesh and Ors., 3. Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd., Mumbai and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
• Review Petition No. 189/2004 in Petition No. 13/2004. Case: Assam State Electricity Board Vs Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  3. Shri Rahman stated that the copy of the review petition had already been served on the respondents. The respondents may file their reply to the review petition latest by 20.7.2005, with a copy to the petitioner who may file its rejoinder, if any, by 29.7.2005. 4. List this petition on 4.8.2005 ...

• Case: Central Coalfields Ltd. Vs DLF Power Ltd.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  3. The Appellant is engaged in the business of raising and selling coal through its various mining leasers situated in the State of Jharkhand. It is also a bulk consumer of electricity. It requires electricity for its various mining operations. Since it is affected by persistent power shortage, the ...

• Petition No. 240/2009. Case: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. and Jharkhand State Electricity Board. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  (4) Where application for determination of tariff of an existing or a new project has been filed before the Commission in accordance with Clauses (1) and (2) of this regulation, the Commission may consider in its discretion to grant provisional tariff upto 95% of the annual fixed cost of the...

• Petition No. 245/MP/2012. Case: Essar Steel India Limited Vs Western Regional Load Despatch Centre and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The petitioner, Essar Steel India Limited (ESIL) has a steel manufacturing facility at Hazira in Gujarat with a capacity of 10 million tonnes per annum. The steel plant has six Electric Arc Furnaces of 100 MW to 120 MW capacity each and seven smaller size Ladle Furnace of 15 MW to 20 MW capacity ...

• Petition No. 166/ MP/2011. Case: In Re : Power Exchange of India Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. Regulation 36 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Power Market) Regulations, 2010 (hereinafter "Power Market Regulations") mandates the Power Exchanges to have their Exit Scheme duly approved by the Commission for closure of the running contracts or succession plan for...

• No. L-1/36/2010. Case: In Re: Benchmark Capital Cost for Substation associated with Transmission system Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The Tariff Policy notified by the Central Government on 6th January, 2006 under Section 3 of the Electricity Act, 2003 provides that when allowing the total capital cost of the project, the Appropriate Commission would ensure that these are reasonable and to achieve this objective, requisite...

• Petition No. 236/SM/2012. Case: In Re: Department of Power, Govt. of Manipur, Imphal and Secretary (Power), Department of Power, Govt. of Manipur, Imphal Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
• Petition No. 21/2004. Case: In Re: DLF Power Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. By order dated 2.11.2004, DLF Power Ltd. (DLF) was granted trading licence for Category 'C' Subsequently, based on the request of the licensee, licence granted was downgraded from Category 'C' to Category 'A' with effect from 1.4.2005. Consequent to the notification of the Central Electricity...

• Petition No. 116/TDL/2012. Case: In Re: HMM INFRA Limited, Chandigarh Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The applicant, HMM INFRA Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) has made the present application under sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of 2003) (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") read with Central Electricity...