Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

Latest documents

• Petition No. 319/GT/2014. Case: NTPC Ltd Vs Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 12/MP/2017. Case: Gurgaon Palwal Transmission Limited and Ors. Vs U.P. Power Corporation Limited and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The first petitioner herein, Gurgaon Palwal Transmission Limited, has been granted transmission licence under Section 14 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") to transmit electricity as a transmission licensee and for that purpose to undertake the business of establishing transmission system for "creation of new 400...

• Petition No. 336/GT/2014. Case: NTPC Limited Vs Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 157/MP/2015. Case: Coastal Gujarat Power Limited Vs Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The petitioner, Coastal Gujarat Power Limited, a subsidiary of Tata Power Company Ltd. has set up a 4000 MW Ultra Mega Power Project at Mundra in the State of Gujarat (Mundra UMPP) based on imported coal after Tata Power Company Ltd. was selected as the successful bidder based on the competitive bidding carried out in accordance with Section 63

• Petition No. 144/GT/2015. Case: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs BSES-Rajdhani Power Ltd. and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 449/MP/2014. Case: Malana Power Company Limited Vs Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The Petitioner in Petition No. 449/MP/2015 is Malana Power Company Ltd. (MPCL), a generating company which has constructed a Run of the River with Pondage Hydroelectric Power Project with an installed capacity of 86 MW (2 x 23MW) on Malana Nallah, a glacier fed tributary of Parbati River in Kullu District of Himachal Pradesh. MPCL entered into a...

• Petition No. 266/GT/2014. Case: Aravali Power Company Private Limited Vs Haryana Power Purchase Centre and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 180/GT/2015. Case: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs Delhi Transco Limited and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 16/MP/2016. Case: Sasan Power Limited Vs M.P. Power Management Company Ltd. and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The petitioner, Sasan Power Limited, has set up a 4000 MW super critical Ultra Mega power Project based on linked captive coal mine at Sasan, District: Singauli, in he State of Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as "Sasan UMPP"). 2. The petitioner has filed the present petition under clauses (b) and (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 79 of

• Petition No. 115/GT/2015. Case: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

Featured documents

• Review Petition No. 26 of 2012 in Petition No. 155/MP/2012. Case: 1. Adani Power Limited, 2. In Re: Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Panchkula and Dakshin Haryana Bijili Vitran Nigam Limited, Panchkula Vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Panchkula, Dakshin Haryana Bijili Vitran Nigam Limited, Panchkula and Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, Vadodara. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The review petition has been filed by Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and Dakshin Haryana Bijili Vitran Nigam Limited (hereinafter "the Review Petitioners") under Section 94 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Regulation 103 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (...

• Petition No. 421/MP/2014. Case: Adani Power Limited Vs Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The petitioners, Adani Power Limited (APL) and Adani Transmission (India) Limited (ATIL) have jointly filed the present petition under sub-section (3) of Section 17 read with Section 79(1)(e) of the Electricity Act, 2003 ("the Act") for approval of transfer of the Transmission licence...

• Petition No. 277/2010. Case: Bhaskhar Shrach Alloys Ltd., (BSAL) Vs Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) and Anr., [Alongwith Petition No. 293/2010]. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. These petitions have been filed by BSAL and SAIL-BSL (hereinafter referred to as ' the Petitioners') for appropriate directions upon DVC for computation of correct level of capacity charges and Fuel Price Adjustment (FPA) in terms of the Commission's order dated 6.8.2009 in Petition No. 66/2005. ...

• Petition No. 159/MP/2012. Case: Coastal Gujarat Power Limited Vs Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, Vadodara and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The Petitioner, Coastal Gujarat Power Limited, a subsidiary of Tata Power Company Limited is engaged in developing and implementing the 4000 MW Ultra Mega Power Project at Mundra in the State of Gujarat based on imported coal. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking the following...

• Petition No. 91/MP/2015. Case: DB Power Limited Vs Western Regional Load Despatch Centre and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, DB Power Limited under Regulation 8 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Grant of connectivity, Long-term Access and Medium-term Open access in inter-State transmission and related matters) Regulations, 2009 as amended from time to...

• Case: GMR Industries Ltd. Vs Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, Hubli Electricity Supply Company Ltd. and State Load Despatch Centre, Karnataka Power Transmifssion Corporation Ltd.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. This petition has been filed against the denial, by the first respondent who is also operating the State Load Despatch Centre, of open access sought by the petitioner. Briefly, the submissions of the petitioner are as under: (a) The petitioner has a co-generation plant of capacity 24 MW and 20.8...

• No. L-1/12/2010-CERC. Case: In Re: Amendment to the Detailed procedures issued under the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and conditions for recognition and issuance of Renewable Energy Certificate for Renewable Energy Generation) Regulations, 2010 Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The Commission has notified the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and conditions for recognition and issuance of Renewable Energy Certificate for Renewable Energy Generation) Regulations, 2010 on 14th January, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as "the REC Regulations"). 2....

• Case: In Re: Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Tariff determination from Renewable Energy Sources) Regulations, 2009 and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Tariff determination from Renewable Energy Sources) (First Amendment) Regulations, 2010 Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1.The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Tariff determination from Renewable Energy Sources) Regulations, 2009, (hereinafter referred to as "the RE Regulations") provide for terms and conditions and the procedure for determination of tariff of the...

• Petition No. 223/2010 (Suo Motu). Case: In Re: Department of Power, Govt. of Nagaland Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The Commission vide its order dated 04.10.2010 initiated suo-motu proceeding and issued show cause notice to the Respondent under Section 142 of the Act for non-compliance of the provisions of UI Regulations as UI charges (including surcharge) for an amount of Rs. 14.14 Crores was outstanding...

• Case: In Re: Empanelment of Designated Independent Agencies/Individual Experts for the Purpose of Vetting of Capital Cost of Hydro Electric Project Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. Third proviso to Clause (ii) of regulation 7 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) regulations, 2009 provides that the "Commission may issue guidelines for vetting of capital cost of hydro electric project by independent agency or expert and in...