Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

Latest documents

• Petition No. 319/GT/2014. Case: NTPC Ltd Vs Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 12/MP/2017. Case: Gurgaon Palwal Transmission Limited and Ors. Vs U.P. Power Corporation Limited and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The first petitioner herein, Gurgaon Palwal Transmission Limited, has been granted transmission licence under Section 14 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") to transmit electricity as a transmission licensee and for that purpose to undertake the business of establishing transmission system for "creation of new 400...

• Petition No. 336/GT/2014. Case: NTPC Limited Vs Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 157/MP/2015. Case: Coastal Gujarat Power Limited Vs Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The petitioner, Coastal Gujarat Power Limited, a subsidiary of Tata Power Company Ltd. has set up a 4000 MW Ultra Mega Power Project at Mundra in the State of Gujarat (Mundra UMPP) based on imported coal after Tata Power Company Ltd. was selected as the successful bidder based on the competitive bidding carried out in accordance with Section 63

• Petition No. 144/GT/2015. Case: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs BSES-Rajdhani Power Ltd. and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 449/MP/2014. Case: Malana Power Company Limited Vs Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The Petitioner in Petition No. 449/MP/2015 is Malana Power Company Ltd. (MPCL), a generating company which has constructed a Run of the River with Pondage Hydroelectric Power Project with an installed capacity of 86 MW (2 x 23MW) on Malana Nallah, a glacier fed tributary of Parbati River in Kullu District of Himachal Pradesh. MPCL entered into a...

• Petition No. 266/GT/2014. Case: Aravali Power Company Private Limited Vs Haryana Power Purchase Centre and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 180/GT/2015. Case: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs Delhi Transco Limited and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

• Petition No. 16/MP/2016. Case: Sasan Power Limited Vs M.P. Power Management Company Ltd. and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The petitioner, Sasan Power Limited, has set up a 4000 MW super critical Ultra Mega power Project based on linked captive coal mine at Sasan, District: Singauli, in he State of Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as "Sasan UMPP"). 2. The petitioner has filed the present petition under clauses (b) and (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 79 of

• Petition No. 115/GT/2015. Case: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  Court Information CERC Cases

Featured documents

• Petition No. 44/TL/2012. Case: Adani Power Limited Vs National Load Despatch Centre and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The petitioner, Adani Power Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of generation and transmission of electricity at various locations in the country, has made this application under Sections 14 and 15 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (the Act) for...

• Petition No. 132/MP/2012. Case: BBM Ispat Ltd Vs State Load Despatch Centre, Karnataka and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  (a) To Set aside the letter bearing No. CEE/SLDC/EE/AEE3/37 dated 9th April, 2012 issued by the 1st Respondent, refusing to grant No Objection Certificate for Inter State Open Access to the Petitioner, by declaring the same as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction, ultra virus to the provisions...

• Petition No. 159/MP/2012. Case: Coastal Gujarat Power Limited Vs Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, Vadodara and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The Petitioner, Coastal Gujarat Power Limited, a subsidiary of Tata Power Company Limited is engaged in developing and implementing the 4000 MW Ultra Mega Power Project at Mundra in the State of Gujarat based on imported coal. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking the following...

• Petition No. 567/MP/2014. Case: DB Power Limited Vs Western Regional Load Despatch Centre and Ors.. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, DB Power Limited under Clause (7) of Regulation 8 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Grant of connectivity, Long-term Access and Medium-term Open access in inter-State transmission and related matters) Regulations, 2009 as amended...

• Case: Global Energy Ltd. (GEL) Vs State of Karnataka through Principal Secretary, Energy Deptt., Karnataka State Load Despatch Centre (SLDC), Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. (KPTCL) and Western Regional Load Despatch Centre (WRLDC). Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The petition has been filed alleging denial of open access by the first three respondents in contravention of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Open Access in inter-State Transmission) Regulations, 2008 (Open Access regulations) and seeking the following (a) Pass an order,...

• Petition No. 247/RC/2012. Case: In Re: Ambitious Power Trading Company Limited Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. This Regulatory Compliance application has been made by the Jindal Power Trading Company Limited for change of name of the applicant from Jindal Power Trading Company Limited to Ambitious Power Trading Company Limited. Based on an application made under sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the...

• Petition No. 256/2010 (Suo-Motu). Case: In Re: Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Tariff determination from Renewable Energy Sources 2009) and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Tariff determination from Renewable Energy Sources) (First Amendment 2010) Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Tariff determination from Renewable Energy Sources) Regulations, 2009, (hereinafter referred to as "the RE Tariff Regulations") provide for terms and conditions and the procedure for determination of tariff of the...

• Petition No. 223/2010 (Suo-motu). Case: In Re: Department of Power, Govt. of Nagaland Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  4. As per information received from North-Eastern Regional Load Dispatch Center (NERLDC), the Respondent has made payment of ` 8.79 core during the month of January and ` 7 lakh during the Month of March 2011. However, after taking into account the accrual during the months of Januar......

• Suo-motu Petition No. 208/2011. Case: In re: EE (SLDC-EO), U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Shakti Bhawan, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh and Ors. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. Regulation 5.4.2 (d) of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Indian Electricity Grid Code) Regulations, 2010 as amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as "Grid Code") provides for implementation of demand management schemes by State Load Despatch Centres through...

• Case: In Re: Indian Energy Exchange Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

  1. The applicant Indian Energy Exchange Ltd., had filed an IA No. 25/2010 under Regulation 116 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999, seeking extension of time for implementing the directions of the Commission contained in its order dated 3.6.2010...