Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 147 of 2013. Case: Suresh Kumar Bhikamchand Jain Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.. Supreme Court (India)
Case Number | Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 147 of 2013 |
Counsel | For Appellant: U. U. Lalit, Nagendra Raj, Harish Salve, Sr. Advocates, Siddharth Aggarwal, Ms. Shyel Trehan, Subhash Jadhav, Adit S. Pujari, Arjun S. Suri, Nikhil Pillai, Sudesh Kotwal, Kumar Rachit, Ms. Lizs Mathew, Advs. and For Respondents: B. H. Marlapalle, Sr. Advocate, Amol B. Karande, Kunal Cheema, Naresh Kumar, Sanjay V. Kharde, Sachin ... |
Judges | Altamas Kabir, C.J.I., J. Chelameswar and Vikramajit Sen, JJ. |
Issue | Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1), 13(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 167, 167(2), 309, 309(2); Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 34, 109, 120B, 177, 376, 376A, 376B, 376C, 376D, 406, 408, 409, 411, 465, 466, 468, 471 |
Citation | 2013 (2) ABR 1166, 2013 (IV) AD 317 (SC), 317, 2013 (4) AJR 156, 2013 (82) AllCC 35, 2013 CriLJ 1625, JT 2013 (8) SC 70, 2013 (1) LW 387 (Crl), 2013 (2) MPHT 353, 2013 (2) RCR 170 (Crl), 2013 (2) SCALE 425, 2013 (3) SCC 77, 2013 (1) SCC (LS) 480 |
Judgement Date | February 13, 2013 |
Court | Supreme Court (India) |
Judgment:
Altamas Kabir, C.J.I.
1. This Special Leave Petition arises out of the judgment and order dated 17th December, 2012, passed by the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court in CRLA No. 4601 of 2012, dismissing the same and directing the Special Judge, in seisin of the matter, to expedite the hearing on framing of charge, as had been directed by this Court on 12th October, 2012, while disposing of Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 6463 of 2012, filed by the co-accused Pradeep Raisoni.
2. This case has thrown into focus certain important issues regarding the right of an accused to be released on bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, hereinafter referred to as "Code of Criminal Procedure". One of such issues concerns the power of the Magistrate to pass orders of remand even beyond the period envisaged under Section 167(2) Code of Criminal Procedure. In the instant case, despite charge-sheet having been filed, no cognizance has been taken on the basis thereof. The learned Magistrate has, however, continued to pass remand orders, without apparently having proceeded to the stage contemplated under Section 309 Code of Criminal Procedure. In order to appreciate the issues which have cropped up during the hearing of the instant case, it is necessary to briefly set out the facts giving rise to the said questions, which have fallen for determination.
3. As per the prosecution case, the Petitioner, Suresh Kumar Bhikamchand Jain, is alleged to have misappropriated amounts meant for development of slums in Jalgaon city, when he was functioning as the Minister of Housing and Slum Area Development, as a Member of the Legislative Assembly. Initially, charge-sheet was filed against certain persons claiming to be the contractors and the Vice-President of the Municipal Corporation, Jalgaon. Thereafter, during investigation the Petitioner was arrested on 11th March, 2012, and while charge-sheet was filed against the four other accused persons on 25th April, 2012, a supplementary charge-sheet came to be filed against the Petitioner herein on 1st June, 2012. For a while, the Petitioner was released on interim bail, but upon rejection of his application for bail on merit, he was again taken into custody on 5th July, 2012.
4. What has been stressed upon on behalf of the Petitioner is that, although, charge-sheet had been filed within the time stipulated under Section 167(2) Code of Criminal Procedure, sanction to prosecute the Petitioner had not been obtained, as a result whereof, no cognizance was taken of the offence. Notwithstanding the above, remand orders continued to be made and the Petitioner remained in magisterial custody.
5. At this stage, it may be pertinent to point out that the Petitioner is an accused in respect of offences punishable under Sections 120B, 409, 411, 406, 408, 465, 466, 468, 471, 177, 109 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, hereinafter referred to as "Indian Penal Code" and also under Sections 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, hereinafter referred to as "the PC Act", in Crime No. 13 of 2006, registered with the City Police Station Jalgaon.
6. Appearing in support of the Special Leave Petition, Mr. U.U. Lalit, learned senior Advocate, submitted that since the statutory period of 90 days, envisaged under Section 167(2) Code of Criminal Procedure, had lapsed, the Petitioner could not have been remanded to custody, as had been done by the learned Special Judge, who is yet to take cognizance for want of sanction. Mr. Lalit submitted that the Petitioner was, therefore, entitled to be released on bail forthwith, since the orders of remand passed by the learned Magistrate after a period of 90 days were without jurisdiction and, therefore, invalid in the facts and circumstances of the case.
7. Mr. Lalit also submitted that Section 309 Code of Criminal Procedure, which also deals with remand of the accused under certain circumstances, does not apply to the allegations relating to the provisions of the PC Act, inasmuch as, there is no committal proceeding contemplated in the proceeding before the learned Special Judge. However, as far as Section 309 Code of Criminal Procedure is concerned, Mr. Lalit submitted that the same would be applicable only after cognizance of the offence had been taken or upon the commencement of the trial before the Special Court. In the absence of cognizance being taken by the Special Court, it could not be said that the trial had commenced and, therefore, further detention of the Petitioner was wholly illegal and not authorised in law and he was, therefore, entitled to be released on bail forthwith on the basis of the "indefeasible right" acquired by him on the failure of the Investigating Authorities to obtain sanction for prosecuting the Petitioner.
8. Mr. Lalit submitted that the High Court also went wrong in holding that in the absence of sanction, the actual trial could not be stayed and could be proceeded with and that the question of grant of sanction could be...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Misc. Bench No. 9470 of 2014. Case: Smt. Chawali Vs State of U. P. High Court of Allahabad (India)
...a variety of factors keeping in view the ability, competency or knowledge of a particular Judge. Once a case is nominated to a particular Judg...
-
Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 13, 14, 18, 23, 24, 70, 83, 108, 124, 209, 309, 310, 323, 341 of 2015, Transfer Petition (C) Nos. 391 and 971 of 2015. Case: Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record-Association and Ors. Vs Union of India (UOI). Supreme Court (India)
...and rights mentioned in the Second Schedule of the Constitution are protected and will not be varied to his/her disadvantage after appointment.317 To give effect to this, Parliament has enacted the Supreme Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, The salary, allowances and pension payable ......
-
Higher Education in Human Rights within China—A Ten-year Review of the Peking University Model
...The rationale behind the master’s 16 Henry Steiner, The University’s Critical Role in the Human Rights Movement, 15 HaRv. Hum. Rts. J 317, 317 (2002).17 Gudmundur Alfredsson, The Right to Human Rights Education, in Economic, social and cultuRal RigHts 213, 213 (Eide, Krause & Rosas eds, 199......
-
Evaluating the Effect of Digital Transformation on Improvement of Service Trade in West Africa
...0.899 (4.471) 292Senegal –0.328** (0.138) 0.558 (1.630) –0.0112 (0.0832) 0.177 (0.395) 1.067 (3.052) 292Sierra Leone –0.658*** (0.237) 0.317 (0.920) 0.0901 (0.204) 1.122 (1.226) 1.272 (5.626) 292To g o –0.167* (0.0943) 1.850 (2.012) –0.453** (0.213) 0.296 (0.479) 0.577 (1.438) 292Source: Au......
-
Misc. Bench No. 9470 of 2014. Case: Smt. Chawali Vs State of U. P. High Court of Allahabad (India)
...a variety of factors keeping in view the ability, competency or knowledge of a particular Judge. Once a case is nominated to a particular Judg...
-
Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 13, 14, 18, 23, 24, 70, 83, 108, 124, 209, 309, 310, 323, 341 of 2015, Transfer Petition (C) Nos. 391 and 971 of 2015. Case: Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record-Association and Ors. Vs Union of India (UOI). Supreme Court (India)
...and rights mentioned in the Second Schedule of the Constitution are protected and will not be varied to his/her disadvantage after appointment.317 To give effect to this, Parliament has enacted the Supreme Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, The salary, allowances and pension payable ......
-
Crl. M.C. No. 1266 of 2013. Case: Abdul Khader and Ors. Vs State of Kerala and Ors.. High Court of Kerala (India)
...v. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board and Another 2014 (1) KHC 390: 2014 (1) KLD 203: 2014 (1) KLT 1013: 2014 (3) SCC 696: 2014 Cri.L.J. 1317: AIR 2014 SC 1539, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that Section 151 of Electricity Act, 2003 will not cause any fetter on the right of the polic......
-
Cri. M. M. O. No. 6 of 2014. Case: Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association Vs State of Himachal Pradesh. Himachal Pradesh High Court
...and that is the effect of the judicial decisions on the point (Vide: In Re: Shripad G. Chandavarkar, AIR 1928 Bom 184: (1928 (29) Cri LJ 317), Jagat Chandra Mozumdar v. Queen Empress, ILR 26 Cal 786, Dr. Shankar Singh v. State of Punjab, 56 Pun LR 54: (AIR Punj 193): (1954 Cri LJ 1393), Nri......
-
Extradition Law: Fundamentals And Processes Part II
...Dual Criminality under the European Arrest warrant", 13 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (EJCCL & CJ) 317-363(2005). [iii] Ivan A Shearer, "Non-Extradition of Nationals", The Adelaide Law [iv] Sharon A Williams, "Nationality, Double Jeopardy, Prescription and......
-
Real Estate Round Up 2019
...The following table depicts the number of RERA registered projects in five major states in India: States Projects Maharashtra 20,178 Gujarat 5,317 Uttar Pradesh 2,612 Karnataka 2,530 Madhya Pradesh 2,163 Table 1:Table depicting projects registered under Source: Gujarat second in number of w......
-
Part One Of A Three-Part Series On International Commercial Arbitration In India: The 2019 Amendment And The Applicability Of Sections 9 / 27 / 37 Of The 1996 Act To Foreign-Seated Arbitrations
...& Ors. v. Mukesh Sharma & Ors., (2017) 14 SCC 722 (SC, 2017). 21. Heligo Charters Private Limited vs. Aircon Feibars FZE, 2018 (5) ArbLR 317 (Bombay High Court, 22. Norscot Rig Management Pvt. Ltd. v. Essar Oil field Services Ltd. & Ors., Comm. Arb. Petn. No. 1065 of 2018 (Bombay High Court......
-
Limitation For Filing An Appeal To Commence From Date Of Pronouncement Of Order By NCLT: Supreme Court Of India
...v. SKS Ispat and Power Ltd. and Ors., Civil Appeal No. 3327 of 2020. 2. Sagufa Ahmed v. Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. Ltd., 2021 (2) SCC 317. 3. Pr. Director General of Income Tax v. Spartex Ceramics India Ltd., 2018 SCC OnLine NCLAT 4. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd. v. Committee of Creditors......
-
Higher Education in Human Rights within China—A Ten-year Review of the Peking University Model
...The rationale behind the master’s 16 Henry Steiner, The University’s Critical Role in the Human Rights Movement, 15 HaRv. Hum. Rts. J 317, 317 (2002).17 Gudmundur Alfredsson, The Right to Human Rights Education, in Economic, social and cultuRal RigHts 213, 213 (Eide, Krause & Rosas eds, 199......
-
Evaluating the Effect of Digital Transformation on Improvement of Service Trade in West Africa
...0.899 (4.471) 292Senegal –0.328** (0.138) 0.558 (1.630) –0.0112 (0.0832) 0.177 (0.395) 1.067 (3.052) 292Sierra Leone –0.658*** (0.237) 0.317 (0.920) 0.0901 (0.204) 1.122 (1.226) 1.272 (5.626) 292To g o –0.167* (0.0943) 1.850 (2.012) –0.453** (0.213) 0.296 (0.479) 0.577 (1.438) 292Source: Au......
-
Penological Justifications as Sentencing Factors in Death Penalty Sentencing
...(2007) 4 S.C.C. 713, Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v. State of Maharashtra (2012) 4 S.C.C. 37 and Mohd. Mannan v. State of Bihar (2011) 5 S.C.C. 317, where determination of the sentence was made only on the basis of the circumstances of the crime, without taking the circumstances of the accuse......
-
“Free Prior Informed Consent” as a Right of Indigenous Peoples
...424 (1921). 19 The word "informed" was appended to "consent" in landmark case of Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees, 317 P. 2d 170 (1957). The concept of "informed consent" in medical ethics was based upon individual autonomy and the same was verbalized by Benjamin Ca......
-
The Companies Act, 2013
...[Omitted.]. 310. [Omitted.]. 311. [Omitted.]. 312. [Omitted.]. 313. [Omitted.]. 8 SECTIONS 314. [Omitted.]. 315. [Omitted.]. 316. [Omitted.]. 317. 318. [Omitted.]. 319. [Omitted.]. 320. [Omitted.]. 321. [Omitted.]. 322. [Omitted.]. 323. [Omitted.]. PART III.—Provisions applicable to every m......
-
Customs Tariff Notification No: 38/2014 (29-Dec-14) Seeks to amend notification No. 46/2011-Customs dated 01.06.2011 so as to provide deeper tariff concessions in respect of specified goods when imported from ASEAN under the India-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement w.e.f. 01.01.2015
... ... 160590 All Goods 0.0 15.0 147 170211 to 170219 All Goods 0.0 ... and was last amended by notification No.57/2013-Cus, dated 31st December, 2013 which was ... ...
-
RBI Master Circular No: RBI/2014-15/93 (01-Jul-14) Master Circular - Lending to Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSME) Sector
...Powerloom 314 Tamil Nadu Madurai Madurai Readymade Garments 315 Tamil Nadu Madurai Madurai Rice Mills 316 Tamil Nadu Madurai Madurai Dal Mills 317 Tamil Nadu Namakkal Thiruchengode Rigs 318 Tamil Nadu Salem Salem Readymade Garments 319 Tamil Nadu Salem Salem Starch & Sago 320 Tamil Nadu......
-
Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Bill, 2014
... ... Whereas the Supreme Court of India vide judgment dated 25th August, ... determined by the Supreme Court in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 120 of 2012 as two hundred and ... (20) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013(18 of 2013); ... (g) "corporation" shall have ... 120 of 2012 ... Explanation:--In case a mining lease has been executed in favour of a ... or between the Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be, or any other ... 36 Gare-Palma Sector-II Maharashtra State Mining Corpn. Ltd. Tamil Nadu ... Ltd. (KPCL) Maharashtra 147 Manora Deep Karnataka Power Corp ... ...