O.A. Nos. 105 and 106 of 2004. Case: State Bank of India Vs Anil and Co. and Ors.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

Case NumberO.A. Nos. 105 and 106 of 2004
CounselFor Appellant: Vimadalal, Adv., i/b., Vimadalal and Co. and For Respondents: G.R. Kinkhabwala, Adv., i/b., Mulla and Mulla and Craigie Blunt and Caroe
JudgesK.J. Paratwar, Presiding Officer
IssueIndian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(2), 2(3) and 35 - Schedule - Articles 13 and 49; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 19; Indian Stamp (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Section 2(3)
CitationII (2006) BC 83
Judgement DateThursday February 23, 2006
CourtMumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

Judgment:

K.J. Paratwar, Presiding Officer

  1. K.J. Paratwar, Presiding Officer-Certain common questions of facts and law are involved in these two matters which can therefore be conveniently decided by this common judgment,

  2. The original applications are thus:

    In O.A. No. 105 of 2004 the claim is of US $ 10,68,864.91 with interest on US $ 7,79,710 @18% p.a. w.e.f. 10.2.2004 till payment;

    In O.A. No. 106 of 2004 the claim is of US $ 5,22,690.06 with interest on US $3,71,481.60 as above.

  3. The defendant No. 1 in O.A. No. 105 of 2004 is partnership firm of which defendant Nos. 2 and 3 are partners. The defendant No. 2 in O.A. No. 106 of 2004 is the proprietor of defendant No. 1. The defendant Nos. 1/2 are used as acceptors of the bills of exchange drawn by M/s. Diam N. V. of Belgium. The details of the bills are set out below:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     O.A. No. 105 O.A. No. 106 of 2004 
     of 2004
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bill 22.10.2001 25.7.2001 5.9.2001

    Dates US $ US $ US $
     7,79,710 1,85,877.41 2,46,481.60

    Due Dates 18.1.2002 22.10.2001 4.12.2001

    Date of 11.8.2003 11.9.2003 11.9.2003

    Dishonour

    through

    Notary

    Drawer M/s. Diam M/s. Diam M/s. Diam
     N.V. N.V. N.V.

     Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Antwerpen,
     Belgium Belgium Belgium

    Acceptor/ Defendant Defendant Defendant
    Drawee Nos. 1/2 Nos. 1/2 Nos. 1/2

    Amount Allahabad Allahabad Allahabad
    payable Bank Bank Bank 
    through

    Part ...No.... US $ ...No...
    Payments 60,877.41
     on 
     17.1.2002
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. Since the defendants did not make payments despite repeated demands and notice, these O.As. are filed.

  4. The defendants have resisted the O.As by similar written statements at Exh. 8 in both the matters. They do not deny that the bills of exchange were drawn and in fact their liability to make payment under the bills. They have come out with a case that they had exported rough diamonds to M/s. Diam N.V. valuing US $ 7,79,710 vide Invoice dated 22.10.2001 in O.A. No. 105 of 2004 and US $ 4,32,359.01 vide invoices dated 25.7.2001 and 5.9.2001 in O.A. No. 106 of 2004. As against these invoices, they imported finished diamonds against the Bills of Exchange in question. The defendants are entitled from M/s. Diam N.V., balance sum of which is US $ 26,602.90 in O.A. No. 105 of 2004 and US $ 2,914.35 in O.A. No, 106 of 2004. The defendants claim to be not liable to make payment under the Hundis and in fact are entitled, as stated above, to the set-off from M/s. Diam N. V., Belgium. The O.As are sought to be dismissed on said grounds.

  5. The evidence in these cases is thus:

    (i) O.A. No. 105 of 2004-The claim affidavits of Mr. R.G. Rodrigues (Exhs. 10 and 30), officer of the Bank and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sanchati (Exh. 15) while bill of exchange is at Exh. 12, the notarisation certificate is at Exh. 13. The defendant has produced on record invoices (Exhs. 16 to 23) and the letters by it to M/s. Diam N.V., Belgium (Exhs. 24 and 25), to R.B.I. (Exh. 26).

    (ii) In O.A. No. 106 of 2004-The claim affidavits of Mr. R.G. Rodrigues (Exhs. 9 and 31) and of defendant Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sanchati (Exh. 16). The bills of exchange are at Exhs. 11 and 12 and noting and protesting certificate is at Exh. 13. The defendants' invoices...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT