Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

Original Application No.200/00044/2017. Case: Smt. Kiran Naahar Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Case NumberOriginal Application No.200/00044/2017
CounselFor Appellant: Shri Manoj Kumar, Adv.
JudgesMr. N.K. Balakrishnan, Judicial Member and Mr. O.P.S. Malik, Administrative Member
IssueAdministrative Law
Judgement DateMay 12, 2017
CourtCentral Administrative Tribunal

Order:

N.K. Balakrishnan, JM.

  1. This Original Application has been filed by the applicant who claims to be the legally wedded wife of the deceased employee Shri Nonelal Naahar.

  2. Annexure A-1, which is the nomination for family pension shows that the applicant is described as wife and four others are shown as the unmarried daughters of the deceased employee.

  3. The applicant contends that the retiral benefits are not disbursed to her on the ground that the private respondent No.3 also claims to be wife of the deceased. An order (Annexure A-2) was passed by the Civil Court granting succession certificate in favour of the applicant and so based on this, the respondents should disburse retiral benefits, the applicant contends.

  4. Hence, we...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT