LPA--671/2016. Case: MUNNA LAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.. High Court of Delhi (India)
| Case Number | LPA--671/2016 |
| Citation | NA |
| Judgement Date | December 11, 2018 |
| Court | High Court of Delhi (India) |
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 11th December, 2018
11 to 23 + LPA 671/2016
MUNNA LAL ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Rajdipa Behura, Amicus Curiae
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Aly Mirza, Advocate for
R-2/IGNOU.
Ms Arti Bansal, Advocate for UOI.
+ LPA 672/2016
RAM SAHAI (NOW DECEASED) THR RESHAM DEVI ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Rajdipa Behura Amicus Curiae
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Aly Mirza, Advocate for
2/IGNOU.
Ms Arti Bansal, Advocate for UOI.
+ LPA 673/2016
MONIKA ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Rajdipa Behura, Amicus Curiae
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Aly Mirza, Advocate for
2/IGNOU.
Ms Arti Bansal, Advocate for UOI.
LPA 671/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of
+ LPA 676/2016
BABITA ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Rajdipa Behura, Amicus Curiae
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Aly Mirza, Advocate for
2/IGNOU.
Mr Harish Kumar Garg, Advocate UOI.
+ LPA 677/2016
PRABHU DAYAL ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Rajdipa Behura, Amicus Curiae
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Aly Mirza, Advocate for
2/IGNOU.
Ms Arti Bansal, Advocate for UOI.
+ LPA 678/2016
SANTOSH DEVI ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Rajdipa Behura, Amicus Curiae
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Aly Mirza, Advocate for
2/IGNOU.
Mr Harish Kumar Garg, Advocate UOI.
+ LPA 679/2016
SATNOSH DEVI ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Rajdipa Behura, Amicus Curiae
LPA 671/2016 & connected matters Page 2 of
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Aly Mirza, Advocate for
2/IGNOU.
+ LPA 680/2016 & CM 45339/2016
SURAJ (NOW DECEASED) THR LR KIRAN ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Rajdipa Behura, Amicus Curiae
Ms Arti Bansal, Advocate for UOI.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Aly Mirza, Advocate for
2/IGNOU.
Mr Harish Kumar Garg, Advocate UOI.
+ LPA 681/2016
PAPPU SINGH ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Rajdipa Behura, Amicus Curiae
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Aly Mirza, Advocate for
2/IGNOU.
+ LPA 682/2016
RAHUL ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Rajdipa Behura, Amicus Curiae
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Aly Mirza, Advocate for
2/IGNOU.
Mr Harish Kumar Garg, Advocate
LPA 671/2016 & connected matters Page 3 of
UOI.
+ LPA 683/2016
SAVITA ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Rajdipa Behura, Amicus Curiae
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Aly Mirza, Advocate for
2/IGNOU.
Mr Harish Kumar Garg, Advocate UOI.
+ LPA 684/2016
MUKESH ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Rajdipa Behura, Amicus Curiae
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Aly Mirza, Advocate for
2/IGNOU.
Ms Arti Bansal, Advocate for UOI.
+ LPA 685/2016
SAROJ DEVI ..... Appellant
Through: Ms Rajdipa Behura, Amicus Curiae
versus
UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent
Through: Mr Aly Mirza, Advocate for
2/IGNOU.
Mr Harish Kumar Garg, Advocate UOI.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
LPA 671/2016 & connected matters Page 4 of
J U D G M E N T %
Dr. S. Muralidhar, J. :
-
These appeals are directed against the common impugned judgment 5th August, 2015 of the learned Single Judge allowing the writ petitions the Indira Gandhi National Open University („IGNOU‟), which challenged an award dated 9th December, 2011 passed by the Government Industrial Tribunal-1 („the Tribunal‟) in the industrial raised by the present Appellants.
-
The background facts are that IGNOU entered into a contract with Computer Systems (Pvt.) Ltd. (hereafter, „the Contractor‟) on 1st
2004 for outsourcing housekeeping services. The contract was subsequentl extended up to 31st October, 2007. The present Appellants were the Contractor to provide the housekeeping services in the campus IGNOU.
-
With effect from 1st November, 2007, the contract for housekeeping services was given by IGNOU to Spick & Span Management Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter „the new Contractor‟). It is stated that new Contractor had brought its own housekeeping staff for the duration its contract. Protesting against the engagement of a new Contractor, Appellants resorted to a strike in the IGNOU campus.
-
IGNOU then filed CS(OS) No.83/2008 in this Court in which a Single Judge of this Court on 15th January, 2008 issued an interim injunction
LPA 671/2016 & connected matters Page 5 of
restraining the Appellants from protesting within a distance of 500 from the IGNOU campus. Ultimately, on 13th March, 2009, the said...
To continue reading
Request your trial