W.P. No. 202282 of 2014 (GM-Res). Case: Masoom Vs The Secretary. High Court of Karnataka (India)

Case NumberW.P. No. 202282 of 2014 (GM-Res)
CounselFor Appellant: R.A. Hipparagi and B.V. Pinto, Advs. and For Respondents: Manvendra Reddy, Govt. Advocate
JudgesB.S. Patil, J.
IssueCriminal Law
Citation2014 (4) AKR 54
Judgement DateJuly 08, 2014
CourtHigh Court of Karnataka (India)

Order:

B.S. Patil, J.

  1. Order of preventive detention passed by the 3rd respondent-Deputy Commissioner, Raichur and the order dated 20.01.2014 extending the detention by 12 months passed by the State Government-respondent No. 1 vide Annexure-G, are called in question in this writ petition by the detenue. Petitioner was proceeded against under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Gamblers, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum Grabbers Act, 1985 (for short 'the Act' herein after). The Deputy Commissioner, Raichur passed an order in exercise of his power under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Act ordering detention of the petitioner vide Annexure-C. The grounds for detention have been that he was involved in as many as six criminal cases and the documents forwarded to the Deputy Commissioner, Raichur, from the Superintendent of Police, Raichur District, Raichur, with regard to the involvement of the petitioner in various offences disclosed that he was a menace to the society as he was indulging in taking law into his own hands affecting peace and tranquillity in the area and that if he was not detained there was every possibility he continuing to indulge in such activities terrorizing the public and committing serious offences which would eventually affect public peace and tranquillity. Order passed by the Deputy Commissioner on 19.11.2013 was for a period of three months. This order of detention was approved by the State Government on 25.11.2013 and the matter was referred for the opinion of Advisory Board. The Advisory Board gave its opinion and based on the opinion of the Advisory Board, the detention order was confirmed for a period of 12 months by issuing an order dated 20.01.2014 by the State Government.

  2. It is also necessary to notice here that the petitioner had made a representation dated 27.11.2013 requesting for his release bringing to the notice of the State Government various facts including his acquittal in five of the criminal cases and also the order of bail granted in the sixth case, which according to the petitioner is the only case pending against him. This representation submitted by petitioner is at Annexure-R5. In the said representation, it is contended by the petitioner that Crime No. 52/2001 of Sadar Bazar Police Station, has ended in acquittal. Similarly, Crime Nos. 202/2004 and 110/2013 have also ended in acquittal. In respect of other cases i.e., Crime Nos...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT