CRL.REV.P.--173/2011. Case: BALKRISHAN Vs. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THR.CBI. High Court of Delhi (India)
| Case Number | CRL.REV.P.--173/2011 |
| Citation | NA |
| Judgement Date | August 14, 2019 |
| Court | High Court of Delhi (India) |
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Order: August 14, 2019
+ CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & CRL.M.A. 3145/2011
C.B.I. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj,
Special Public Prosecutor with DSP Manoj Pathak.
Versus
STATE & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public
Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram.
+ CRL.M.C. 2925/2014 & CRL.M.As. 10082/2014 & 13606/2015
SANDEEP MALIK & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Kaadambari & Mr. Navin Kr.
Thakur, Advocates.
Versus
STATE & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public
Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram.
Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI with DSP Manoj Pathak.
+ CRL.REV.P. 173/2011 & CRL.M.As. 16728/2017 & 20647/2017
BALKRISHAN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vikas Arora & Ms. Radhika Arora, Advocates.
CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & connected cases Page 1 of 9
Versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THR. CBI .....Respondent
Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public
Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram.
Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI with DSP Manoj Pathak.
+ CRL.M.C. 5104/2017 & CRL.M.A. 20094/2017
KRISHAN GULIA & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Kaadambari & Mr. Navin Kr.
Thakur, Advocates.
Versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ....Respondents
Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public
Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram.
Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI with DSP Manoj Pathak.
+ CRL.REV.P. 198/2018 & CRL.M.A. 4305/2018
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj,
Special Public Prosecutor with DSP Manoj Pathak.
Versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ....Respondents
Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public
Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram.
CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & connected cases Page 2 of 9
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R
In the above captioned first petition, the challenge is to order of 1st
November, 2010 vide which trial court has refused to club FIR No. 592/02 of Police Station Najafgarh, Delhi and RC No. 4(S)/2003.
Vide impugned order of 14th December, 2010 trial court has refused to discharge Krishan Gulia & Sandeep Malik as charge against them already stood framed in Sessions Case No. 06/09 under Sections 307/353/186 of IPC & under Section 25 of Arms Act.
In the above captioned second petition, quashing of FIR 592/2002, under Sections 186/353/307/34 of IPC r/w Sections 25/27/54 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Najafgarh, Delhi is sought and in the alternate discharge of petitioners-Sandeep Malik & Krishan Gulia is sought on the basis of final report filed by CBI in R.C. No. 4(S)/2003-SIU-1, New Delhi.
In the above captioned third petition, prayer is made to re-consider the sanction aspect before proceeding further in RC No. 4(S)/2003, under Section 302/364/120-B/218 of IPC, titled as ‘CBI Vs. Balkrishan‟. In the above captioned fourth and fifth petition quashing of order of 6th
September, 2017 is sought.
With the consent of learned counsel for both the sides, the above captioned petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order while treating CRL.REV.P. 173/2011 as lead case.
CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & connected cases Page 3 of 9
The factual background of this case as noticed in the trial court’s order of 6th September, 2017 are as under:-
“The...
To continue reading
Request your trial