Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

Case nº Revision Petition No. 567 Of 2016, (Against the Order dated 13/10/2015 in Appeal No. 490/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, September 26, 2016 (case 1. Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Ltd. 2. Ms. Aakriti Manocha Vs 1. Harish Kumar Chadha and Anr. 2. Abhishek Batra)

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JudgeFor Appellant: Ms. Titasha Banerjee, Advocate and For Respondents: In person an dMr. Alok Pandey, Advocate and Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate
PresidentDr. B.C. Gupta,Presiding Member
Resolution DateSeptember 26, 2016
Issuing OrganizationNational Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Order:

  1. This revision petition has been filed against the impugned interim order dated 13.10.2015, passed by the Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ''the State Commission'') vide which, the right of the petitioner insurance company to file reply to the memo of appeal was closed by the State Commission. Notice of the petition was issued to the respondents, in response to which respondent-1/complainant appeared in person and respondent no. 2 put in appearance through counsel. The learned counsel for the parties as well as respondent No. 1, were heard.

  2. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after receiving notice of First Appeal No. 490/2013, filed by the complainant/respondent No. 1 from the State Commission, their Advocate appeared before the State Commission on 21.04.2014, filed his vakalatnama and sought time to file his reply. The said Advocate appeared on the subsequent dates of hearing, i.e., 27.10.2014 and 11.05.2015 also, but sought adjournments to file reply every time. On 11.05.2015, the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT