W.P.(C)--9303/2018. Case: YOGITA CHAUHAN Vs. OFFICE DEPUTY DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION NCT OF DELHI. High Court of Delhi (India)
| Case Number | W.P.(C)--9303/2018 |
| Citation | NA |
| Judgement Date | December 12, 2018 |
| Court | High Court of Delhi (India) |
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on: 07.12.2018 Pronounced on:12.12.2018 + W.P.(C) 9303/2018 and CM APPL 36913/2018
YOGITA CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Shikha Sapra, Adv.
versus
OFFICE DEPUTY DIRECTORATE OF
EDUCATION NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Adv.
GNCTD
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T
-
Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction directing the respondent for quashing and setting aside the order dated 24.04.2018. Consequently, directing the respondent to issue joining letter to petitioner forthwith.
-
The brief facts of the case are that the respondent advertised public notice dated 26.05.2017 for “Drawing a Panel for Teachers for Empanelment in Delhi Government Schools for Academic Year 2017-18.” The respondent took out another
notice dated 28.09.2017 calling all the selected Guest Teachers verification of their documents as per the given schedule.
16.10.2017, the petitioner got selected and in pursuance thereto, got her documents and credentials verified with respondent. On the petitioner gave birth to a child through caesarean process. respondent vide its another circular dated 30.01.2018 directed selected candidates to appear at their office between 01.02.2018
03.02.2018 for further verification of documents. Despite the fact the petitioner had a caesarean delivery only few days prior, appeared on 03.02.2018 before the office of the respondent for verification of her documents. However, the respondent differently and even harassed her by not marking her Accordingly, the petitioner wrote a letter to respondent on itself requesting the respondent for marking her attendance issuance of the joining letter.
-
It is the case of the petitioner that being aggrieved inaction on part of the respondent authority, despite several visits complaints, the petitioner filed a Civil Writ Petition no.1673/2018 and the same was disposed of vide order
21.02.2018 directing respondent to positively respond to petitioner letter within a period of two weeks and the fate of the same conveyed to the petitioner within a week. The respondent failed comply with the aforesaid order. Therefore, the petitioner compelled to move a contempt petition vide Contempt Case No.309/2018, thereafter only the respondent passed the order.
-
Not satisfied with the order, the petitioner preferred an application and received a reply thereto wherein it was revealed respondent had...
To continue reading
Request your trial