CRL.A.--514/2017. Case: VIRENDER @ BIJENDER Vs. STATE. High Court of Delhi (India)

Case NumberCRL.A.--514/2017
CitationNA
Judgement DateJuly 21, 2017
CourtHigh Court of Delhi (India)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Reserved on: 30th May, 2017

Decided on: 21st July, 2017

+ CRL.A. 357/2017

MADHU GUPTA ..... Appellant

Represented by: Mr. Joginder Tuli, Ms. Joshini

Tuli, Advs.

Versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent

Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with SI Ravinder, PS Bawana.

+ CRL.A. 514/2017

VIRENDER @ BIJENDER ..... Appellant

Represented by: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Adv.

Versus

STATE ..... Respondent

Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with SI Ravinder, PS Bawana.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

  1. Convicted for offences punishable under Section 302 read Section 34 IPC and Section 201 read with Section 34 IPC, Madhu Gupta and Virender @ Bijender challenge the impugned judgment dated 18th

    Crl.A. 357/2017 & 514/2017 Page 1

    2017 and the order on sentence dated 21st March, 2017 sentencing

    life imprisonment and to pay a fine of `10,000/- each for the punishable under Section 302/34 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of `1,000/- each for offence

    under Section 201/34 IPC.

  2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for Madhu Gupta

    that even accepting the case of the prosecution having been proved reasonable doubt, it can at best be held that the appellant caused an injury to the deceased in exercise of her right of private defence as laid down in clause thirdly to Section 100 IPC. It is further submitted that the appellant discharged the burden as required under Section 105 of Evidence proving the existence of circumstances bringing her case within the exception laid down in clause thirdly to Section 100 IPC. The right of private defence of the body of a mother's daughter extends to voluntary causing death, if the offence which occasioned the exercise of the right

    assault with intention of committing rape. The appellant in her

    under Section 313 Cr.P.C stated that only scuffle had taken place

    her and the deceased. As per the post mortem report, cause of death opined to be asphyxia due to manual pressure. Thus even as per the mortem report, no weapon of offence was used. The alleged offence occurred on the spur of the moment. Hence appellant cannot be

    for offences punishable under Sections 302 or 201 IPC.

  3. Learned counsel for Virender @ Bijender submits that even as per the case of prosecution, no intention to kill can be attributed to the

    Prior to the incident, Virender, Madhu and the deceased Satender @

    all had dinner together, there was no quarrel and no premeditation.

    Crl.A. 357/2017 & 514/2017 Page 2

    no other evidence against the appellant except the sole testimony (PW-7) which proves that appellant committed no offence and acted defence of „K‟. He further submits that in the alternative since the appellant had already undergone approximately 8 years and 5 months, he be

    on the period already undergone. In order to buttress his submissions learned counsel relies upon the decision of Division Bench of this reported as 2016 IV AD (DELHI) 524 Anuj Kumar Tiwari v. State

    NCT of Delhi.

  4. Learned APP for the State on the other hand submits that prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellants not only committed murder of Satender @ Nanhe but also disguised the body to be of Vijender Gupta thus concealing the offence and destroying the evidence.

  5. Process of law was set into motion on 12th September, 2008

    PCR call was received at about 11:00 P.M. stating that "A-14 Bajitpur stand kirayedar ka makkan do din se band hai darwaje se lal va kala nikal raha hai". The aforesaid information was recorded vide DD No

    [Ex. PW-35/A] and assigned to SI Jai Kishan. He along with Ct.

    Singh reached the spot i.e. H.No. A-14, Village Bajidpur, Delhi. They found a crowd of people gathered along with Om Kumar. Blood was oozing out of a room situated on the first floor. When they entered the room, they

    pot, gadda and an iron box with "MANIPUR VOLUNTARY

    ASSN." written on it. When they opened the box, a dead body of a person aged 35 years was found lying in a pool of blood. Dead body decomposed condition and a foul smell was emitting from the dead

    Dead body was identified to be of Bijender @ Virender.

  6. Statement of Om Kumar (PW-4) was recorded vide Ex.

    Crl.A. 357/2017 & 514/2017 Page 3

    wherein he stated that he resided at H.No. 207, Village Bajidpur, Delhi

    his family and worked as driver. He had another house in village

    bearing House No. A-14 which had 12 rooms and number of tenants residing there. Virender Gupta (appellant herein) was residing in

    those rooms along with his two sons since last 2-2½ months. On September 2008 around 9:00-10:00 P.M., when he went to the tenanted room for a surprise check, he met the son of Virender Gupta who told him that his mother Madhu Gupta (appellant), who had gone to the village, had

    back. On 12th September, 2008 at around 10:30-10:45 P.M., his

    tenant namely Dhirender came and told him that the room of Vijender Gupta was locked from outside, blood was coming out of the room from under door and foul smell was also emanating. When he went to house number A-14, he saw that the door was locked from outside and red coloured blood and water was coming out from the room. Thereafter, he called the police crowd also gathered there. In the meantime, PCR van came. The lock

    room was broken and it was found that blood was dripping from an iron box in which the dead body of his tenant Virender Gupta was lying in a

    blood. However, Madhu Gupta and her children were not present

    On the basis of the aforesaid statement, FIR No. 327/2008 [Ex.

    was registered under Sections 302/201 IPC at PS Bawana.

  7. Broken lock was taken into possession vide memo Ex. PW-4/B. Crime team reached the spot and further investigation was handed over to

    Ram Avtar. Site plan [Ex. PW-46/A] was prepared. Blood sample bloodstained earth control [Ex.P-3], earth control [Ex.P-4] and iron

    [Ex.P-1] were seized vide memo Ex. PW-4/C. Three empty mobile

    boxes [Ex.P-6], which were found in the room where the dead body

    Crl.A. 357/2017 & 514/2017 Page 4

    lying, were also taken into possession vide memo Ex. PW-4/D.

  8. On 14th September 2008, Insp. Ram Avtar met Smt. Bimla

    who had her plot in front of the house of Om Kumar, who told him

    the morning of 11th September, 2008, she had seen Virender along

    family leaving on bicycle with all his belongings. On the basis statement of Smt. Bimla, the dead body was identified to be not of

Bijender Raj Kumar, brother-in-law of Virender, Prem Pal, brother Virender, Om Kumar, owner of the house, Pankaj and Jatan Ram, tenants of Om Kumar and Dharampal (PW-2), resident of village Bajitpur were

at the mortuary of BJRM Hospital and were shown the dead body. The dead body was identified to be of Satender @ Nanhe who was resident Virender @ Bijender‟s Village i.e. Sungarhi, Etah (U.P.) and lastly

with Virender @ Bijender in the tenanted room. Relatives of Satender Nanhe were informed and called to Delhi for further identification

dead body. Shyam Babu and Anil, brothers of deceased Satender @ identified the dead body as that of Satender @ Nanhe. Dead identification statements of Shyam Babu [Ex. PW-21/A] and Anil [Ex. 24/A] were recorded. Insp. Ram Avtar prepared the inquest papers

request form for conducting autopsy [Ex. PW-46/B], brief facts

46/C] and death report [Ex. PW-46/D].

  1. On 25th September 2008, one gathri [Ex. PW-36/P-5] containing

    on which Goa Chai and Glori Chai was printed containing 58

    school bag containing eight books of third standard and six copies, school dress and one bicycle on which sticker of KW Engineering

    was affixed were produced by Bansi Lal, uncle of Virender @ Bijender, who stated that these items were left with him on 11th September 2008

    Crl.A. 357/2017 & 514/2017 Page 5

    Virender. These items were taken into possession vide seizure memo PW-27/A. On 6th October 2008, Gayadin, relative of Virender Sumit, son of Virender, whose statements were recorded under Sections and 164 Cr.P.C. vide Ex. PW-46/F and Ex. PW-47/A respectively.

  2. On 26th October, 2008, Virender and Madhu were apprehended Mayur Vihar, Phase III, RTV Bus stand near Police Booth. Virender arrested vide arrest memo Ex. PW-4/E and personal search was carried vide memo Ex. PW-4/G. Madhu was arrested vide arrest memo Ex.

    and her personal search was conducted vide memo Ex. PW-22/A. Two cards [Ex.P-7 and Ex.P-8], one belonging to deceased Satender @

    and other to Virender @ Bijender, were recovered from Virender which were seized vide seizure memo Ex. PW-37/A. Disclosure statements of

...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT