Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

Review No. 52 of 2011 in Original Application No. 1154 of 2008. Case: Vinod Kumar Kushwaha Vs Union of India. Central Administrative Tribunal

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Case NumberReview No. 52 of 2011 in Original Application No. 1154 of 2008
CounselFor Appellant: S.K. Pandey, Advocate and For Respondents: Arun Prakash, Advocate
JudgesJasmine Ahmed, Member (J)
IssueService Law
Judgement DateJuly 02, 2014
CourtCentral Administrative Tribunal

Order:

Jasmine Ahmed, Member (J), (Allahabad Bench)

  1. Heard Shri S.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Prakash, learned counsel for the respondents.

  2. The instant review petition has been preferred against the order dated 11.03.2011 passed by this Tribunal on Original Application No. 1154 of 2008 (Vinod Kumar Kushwaha Versus U.O.I. and others).

  3. The judgment dated 11.03.2011 passed by Mr. D.C. Lakha is a detailed order taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case and also after perusing and discussing the record/pleadings. The main prayer in the Original Application No. 1154/2008 is that the applicant be considered for getting compassionate appointment up to 20 years after attaining the age of majority as per Railway Board circular dated 22.12.1994 and 16.10.1995.

  4. I have gone through the order in detailed perused the pleadings and heard the rival contentions for both the parties.

  5. In my considered opinion, there is no illegality in the order passed by this Tribunal more so as per the O.M...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT