CS(OS)--405/2016. Case: VERONICA (MINOR) THROUGH: MOTHER NEETU SODHI Vs. JITENDRA PAL SINGH SODHI & ORS. High Court of Delhi (India)
Case Number | CS(OS)--405/2016 |
Citation | NA |
Judgement Date | December 09, 2019 |
Court | High Court of Delhi (India) |
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of decision: 9th December, 2019 + CS(OS) 405/2016 & IAs No.9889/2016 & 11579/2018 (both u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 12536/2018 (u/S 151 CPC)
VERONICA (MINOR) THROUGH: MOTHER NEETU SODHI ..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Deepak Verma, Adv.
Versus
JITENDRA PAL SINGH SODHI & ORS ..... Defendants
Through: D-1 in person for D-2&3.
Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Adv. for D-4 .
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
-
The plaintiff No.1 Ms. Veronica (Minor), acting through her mother plaintiff No.2 Neetu Sodhi, has instituted this suit for (i) declaration that the plaintiff No.1, being a coparcener and Class I heir, is entitled to a share of 1/18th + 1/72th of properties (a) B-10/329, Sunder Vihar, New Delhi, (b) Plot No.418, measuring 249.51 sq. yards, situated in the Hindustan Corporate House Building Society Limited, In Guruharkishan Nagar, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi, (c) land bearing Khasra Nos.21/1, 2/1, 20/2, 5/2, 14/21, 33/1, 15/14, 20 & 24 viz standard area 32 Karnal & 9 Marlas and total area with cost 41 Karnal 19 Marlas situated at P.O. & Village Jallupurkhara Tehsil & Distt. Amritsar, (d) land bearing Khasra Nos.45/3, 39/23 & 24/2 viz 3 Karnal 19 Marlas. No had Basta 16 situated at P.O. & Village Jallupurkhara Tehsil & Distt. Amritsar, (e) Two plots for houses (one
CS(OS) No.405/2016 Page 1 of 6
near Late Sodhi Kashmira Singh’s House and another plot in front of it); complete particulars of which are pleaded to be not available with the plaintiff at present, (f) One open Havelli, and one House near Late Sodhi Mela Singh situated at P.O. & Village Jallupurkhara Tehsil & Distt. Amritsar, (g) Plot No.3, Block-A, Ballabhgarh, Gurgaon, Haryana and (h) Schemes of Unit Trust of India dated 03.02.1992 and other dates; (ii) directions to the defendants specially the defendant No.1 Jitendra Pal Singh Sodhi, to give details of the entire ancestral properties, to enable the plaintiffs to claim their share in other properties; (iii) partition; and, (iv) permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dealing with the properties.
-
The pleaded case of the plaintiffs is, (I) that the plaintiffs and the defendants No.1 to 4 are members of Joint Hindu Family; (II) that the defendants No.1 & 2 Jitendra Pal Singh Sodhi & Bhartinder Kaur Sodhi are the paternal grandparents of plaintiff No.1 and father and mother-in-law of plaintiff No.2; (III) that the defendant No.3 Harpreet Sabharwal is the paternal aunt of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial