Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

First Appeal No. 303 of 2014 and Misc. Application No. 125 of 2014. Case: Prakash Associates and Ors. Vs Rajeev Santoshkumar Bhandari and Ors.. Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Case NumberFirst Appeal No. 303 of 2014 and Misc. Application No. 125 of 2014
CounselFor Appellant: R.R. Ganu, Adv. a/w. Santosh Patil, Adv. and For Respondents: M.P. Salunke, Adv.
JudgesUsha S. Thakare, Presiding Member
IssueConsumer Law
Citation2015 (2) AllMR 97
Judgement DateJanuary 13, 2015
CourtMaharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Judgment:

Usha S. Thakare, Presiding Member

  1. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Pune in consumer complaint No. 192/12 dated 30/11/2013, original opponents/appellants have preferred appeal bearing No. 303/14. However, there is a delay of 116 days in filing the appeal. Therefore, the applicants/appellants have filed the present application for condonation of delay. It is submitted that he has genuine hopes in appeal on merits. Applicants/appellants have business as promoters and builders. After judgment, applicant has instructed his staff members to forward file to dealing advocate. Applicants' advocate was also waiting for the file. However, applicant was under impression that file is in custody of dealing advocate. But dealing advocate was waiting for file. In course of locating...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT