CRL.M.C.--6334/2019. Case: PRADEEP AGGARWAL Vs. STATE & ORS.. High Court of Delhi (India)
| Case Number | CRL.M.C.--6334/2019 |
| Citation | NA |
| Judgement Date | December 09, 2019 |
| Court | High Court of Delhi (India) |
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 09
+ CRL.M.C. 6334/2019
PRADEEP AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner
Through Ms. Garima Verma, Adv. with petitioner in person
versus
STATE & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. K K Ghei, APP for State
WSI Sushila, PS Paschim Vihar Mr. Suman Saharan, Adv. for Rwith R-2 in person
Mr. Prabhas Roy, Adv. for R-3 to 7 with R-3 to 7 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 42211/2019
-
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
-
Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.6334/2019
-
Vide the present petition, the petitioner seek quashing of FIR 291/2011 dated 01.10.2011 registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
-
Notice issued.
-
Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel respondent no.2 and respondent nos.3 to 7 and with the consent counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
-
The petitioner and respondent no.2 got married on 02.02.2006 Hindu rites and rituals. Out of the said wedlock, one child namely, Aggarwal, was born. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioner and respondent no.2, they started living separately December, 2010.
-
The petitioner and respondent no.2 have settled all their amicably vide Settlement cum Agreement dated 23.10.2018, whereby petitioner has agreed to pay a sum of ₹25 lacs to respondent No. 2 all her claims. And apart from it, it has also been agreed upon by the parties that the petitioner shall have visitation rights to meet the baby,
Aggarwal, subject to a total of sixty days in a year with intimation/information to the respondent no.2.
-
The complainant/respondent no.2 is present in person with counsel...
To continue reading
Request your trial