Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

Case nº First Appeal No. 1226 Of 2016, (Against the Order dated 18/07/2016 in Complaint No. 110/2014 of the State Commission Maharastra) of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, December 01, 2016 (case Prabha P. Kamath Vs Sandesh Govind Bhatte and Anr.)

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JudgeFor Appellant: Mr. Shashikant T. Sawadkar, Advocate
PresidentMr. D.K. Jain,President and Mrs. M. Shreesha,Member
Resolution DateDecember 01, 2016
Issuing OrganizationNational Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Order:

Delay condoned.

This First Appeal, under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short "the Act"), by the Complainant, is directed against the order dated 18.07.2016, passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Mumbai (for short "the State Commission") in Consumer Complaint No. RBT/CC/14/110 in CC/08/180. By the impugned order, the State Commission has dismissed the Complaint on the ground that the Complainant had failed to prove that the Opposite Parties in the Complaint, which included the Sub-Registrar concerned, had rendered any services, as defined under Section 2(1)(o) of the Act, to the Complainant and, therefore, the Complaint under the Act was not maintainable.

Having heard learned Counsel for the Appellant and perused the Agreement to Sale, dated 26.11.2000, entered into between the Appellant and one Sandesh Govind Bhatte for sale of a part of the agricultural land, admeasuring 7000 sq. ft., bearing plots no. 228, 229 and 230 at Bombay Maharashtra Goa National Highway at village Ghodsai, Taluka Roha, District Raigad, we are in complete agreement with the State Commission that the said...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT