Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

Misc. Application No. 8 of 2011 in Appeal No. 146 of 2010. Case: Parsoli Corporation Limited, Zafar Yunus Sareshwala and Uves Yunus Sareshwala Vs The Securities and Exchange Board of India. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Case NumberMisc. Application No. 8 of 2011 in Appeal No. 146 of 2010
JudgesN.K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer and P.K. Malhotra, Member
IssueCode of Civil Procedure
Judgement DateJanuary 25, 2011
CourtSecurities and Exchange Board of India

Order:

N.K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer

  1. This order will dispose of five Misc. Applications No. 8 to 12 of 2011 filed by the Appellants stating that as many as 45 submissions made on their behalf have not been noticed by us while dismissing the appeals by our order dated January 12, 2011. At the outset, we may mention that these applications lack bona fides. We say so because we had disposed of five connected appeals by our order dated January 12, 2011 and the arguments had been addressed before us in the main appeal which was Appeal No. 146 of 2010. No arguments were addressed in the connected four appeals and yet applications have been filed stating that we have not taken note of the arguments advanced by the learned Counsel for the Appellants. As already observed, the arguments were addressed only in Appeal No. 146 of 2010 in which Application No. 8 of 2011 has been filed. It is stated that as many as 25 contentions of the Appellants have not been noticed by us. Only some of theses pleas had been raised during the course of the arguments and in view of the admitted stand of the parties as noticed by us in paragraphs 4 to 9 of...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT