Writ Petition No. 3151/2011. Case: Neetu Tejkumar Bhagat and Another Vs Jabalpur Development Authority and Others, [Alongwith Writ Petition No. 7111/2011]. High Court of Madhya Pradesh (India)
| Case Number | Writ Petition No. 3151/2011 |
| Counsel | For Appellant: Mr. Sharad Verma, Advocate and Mr. Arvind Shrivastava, Advocate and For Respondents: Mr. R. N. Singh, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Avinash Patel Advocate with him, Mr. Rajendra Tiwari, Mr. R.P. Agrawal and Mr. Rohit Arya, Sr. Advocates, Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate with them and Mr. Swapnil Ganguly, Panel Lawyer and Mr. Parag Chaturvedi,... |
| Judges | Sushil Harkauli, ACJ and Alok Aradhe, J. |
| Issue | Property Law |
| Judgement Date | September 26, 2012 |
| Court | High Court of Madhya Pradesh (India) |
Order:
Alok Aradhe, J.
-
The core issue involved in both the writ petitions is whether a public asset can be disposed of without ascertaining its market value in a fair and transparent manner. In order to appreciating the controversy involved in the writ petitions, for the facility of reference, we ate referring to the facts from W.P. No. 3151/2011. The erstwhile Town Improvement Trust, Jabalpur prepared a scheme namely, Scheme No. 18. Civic Centre, Jabalpur, which later on was transferred to Jabalpur Development Authority. In the said Scheme, an area admeasuring approximately 1232.169 sq. meters was reserved for construction of Cafeteria on the ground floor and the Library on the first floor. The area situate adjoining to area earmarked for Cafeteria, has been earmarked for children park and for a water body and is in existence. The Jabalpur Development Authority (hereinafter referred as "the Authority") constructed a building admeasuring 700.99 sq. meters with two halls on the aforesaid land for the purpose of establishment of Cafeteria. Under an agreement dated 18-6-1987, two halls in the building were allotted for running the Cafeteria on licence, without issuing any Notice Inviting Tender. In the year 1992, the license was renewed in favour of a partnership firm comprising three persons including respondent No. 2 for running the Cafeteria for a period of 5 years, i.e., from 18-7-1992 to 27-7-1997. The said licence was renewable with enhancement of licence fee. During the currency of the licence, the licencee expressed its willingness to take the open terrace admeasuring 8074 sq. feet on rent and therefore, the aforesaid terrace was allotted on licence for a period of three years on 1-1-1995. The Housing and Environment Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh by order dated 24-8-1997 directed the Chief Executive officer of the Authority to cancel the licence, as the same was granted without inviting any tenders. The Authority was further directed to invite tenders and to allot the same to the highest bidder on licence. In compliance of the aforesaid order, the Authority issued notice of eviction to the licencee. The licencee thereafter filed a writ petition, namely, W.P. No. 3022/97, in which the High Court granted stay with regard to proceeding for eviction initiated against the licencee. The licencee thereafter submitted a representation on 7-8-1999 that it is willing to pay entire arrears of rent and shall withdraw the writ petition if the licence is renewed. In order to resolve the dispute, instructions were sought from the State Government by the Authority. Thereupon the State Government, vide communication dated 27-10-1999 instructed the Authority to decide the issue pertaining to renewal of the agreement at its level keeping in view the interest of the Authority and the litigation, which was pending before the High Court.
-
The Authority thereafter took a decision to renew the licence at an enhanced amount of rent subject to the condition that the arrears of rent would be deposited and the pending writ petition would be withdrawn from the High Court. It is pertinent to mention here that certain cart vendors had been vending food articles by encroaching upon the land situate adjoining to the property in question which belongs to the Authority. The encroachment could not be removed despite the repeated efforts. Thereupon, the Authority took special permission of the State Government to sell the land. The State Government, vide order dated 3-10-2003 granted permission to 'the Authority to allot the land at the rate of ` 1595/- per sq. ft. to the aforesaid cart vendors.
-
Thereafter, a meeting of the officials of various department authorities was held on 1-2-2006 under the Chairmanship of Minister of State, Urban Administration and Housing & Environment Department in which various issues pertaining to development projects...
To continue reading
Request your trial