Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

Application No. 14025 of 2017. Case: Mohd. Jishan and Others Vs State of U.P. and Others. High Court of Allahabad (India)

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Case NumberApplication No. 14025 of 2017
CounselFor Appellant: Vibha Srivastava, Adv.
JudgesSurya Prakash Kesarwani, J.
IssueIndian Penal Code - Sections 498A, 504, 406
Judgement DateMay 09, 2017
CourtHigh Court of Allahabad (India)

Judgment:

Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the present matter is a matrimonial matter which can be well considered by the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. He further submits that there are chances of reconciliation between the husband and wife, therefore, the matter may be referred to the Mediation Centre.

Having considered the arguments advanced across the bar, I have a feeling that Court owes a duty to the society to strain to the utmost to repair the frayed relations between the parties so that the wounded situation may be healed into a healthy rapprochement. The matter in hand appears to be one of those cases in which reconciliation should be tried between the disputing parties.

In view of the aforesaid, the applicant is directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 10,000/- within three weeks from today with the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of which 90% shall be paid to the opposite party No.2 for appearance before the Mediation Centre.

The matter is remitted to the Mediation...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT