Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 23580 of 2011. Case: Mohd. Jameel Khan Vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.. High Court of Allahabad (India)

Case NumberCivil Misc. Writ Petition No. 23580 of 2011
JudgesV.K. Shukla, J.
IssuePolice Act - Sections 7 and 29; Evidence Act, 1872; Indian Penal Code - Sections 223, 224 and 342; Uttar Pradesh Police Officer of Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 - Rules 4, 8(4) and 14(1); Uttar Pradesh Rajya Sahkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Employees, Service Rules, 1976 - Rule 104; Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations - Regulation...
Judgement DateApril 22, 2011
CourtHigh Court of Allahabad (India)

Judgment:

V.K. Shukla, J.

1. Petitioner has approached this Court for following relief:

(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the departmental disciplinary proceedings initiated against the Petitioner under Rule 14(1) of Uttar Pradesh Police Officer of Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991, in pursuance of the order/charge sheet dated 17.3.2011, issued by the Respondent No. 4.

(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents, to stay the further departmental disciplinary proceedings initiated against the Petitioner in pursuance of the order/charge sheet dated 17.3.2011.

(iii) Issue any other writ order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

(iv) To award cost of this petition.

2. Brief background of the case is that Petitioner has been performing and discharging his duties as constable. First information report has been lodged against the Petitioner being Case Crime No. 33 of 2011, under Section 342 I.P.C. and 29 of Police Act at Police Station Lohata, District Varanasi. In the said criminal case, charge sheet in question has been filed. On 17.3.2011 by the Respondent No. 4. departmental charge sheet has been given, at this juncture Petitioner has moved an application on 23.2.2011 mentioning therein that departmental charge sheet has been issued to him on 17.3.2011 in order to initiate proceeding under Rule 14(1) of U.P. Police Officers of the Subordinate Rank (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 and as criminal trial is on going, departmental proceeding be stayed. Once no action being taken, at this juncture present writ petition has been filed with the prayer mentioned above.

3. Sri Vijay Gautam, Advocate, learned Counsel for the Petitioner contended with vehemence that in the present case, criminal case and departmental proceeding are based on same set of fact and same evidence, as such continuance of departmental inquiry, is not at all justifiable and consequentially directive be issued for withholding departmental proceeding till criminal trial is not over. For this preposition he has also placed reliance on Regulation 492 and 493 of U.P. Police Regulations as well as judgment of Hon''ble Apex Court in the case Capt. M. Paul Anthony v. Bharat Coal Mines Ltd. and 2004 (7) S.C.C. 27: 1999 (3) S.C.C. 679 State Bank of India v. R.B. Sharma. and the judgment of this Court in the case of Prafulkla Kumar v. ST Mukhawar, Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 36479 of 2005 decided on 1.4.2011.

4. Learned Standing counsel on the other hand contended that there is no bar in simultaneous proceeding i.e. criminal proceeding and departmental proceeding can go on simultaneously as area of both departmental proceeding and criminal prosecution are altogether different and as such there is no occasion for staying departmental proceedings such writ petition be dismissed.

5. After the respective arguments have been advanced, the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Capt. M. Paul Anthony v. Bharat Coal Mines Ltd. AIR 1999 SC 1416 is being looked into. In the aforementioned judgment the Hon'ble Apex Court after taking into account various earlier judgments has held that departmental proceedings and proceedings in criminal case can proceed simultaneously, as there is no bar in their being conducted simultaneously, though separately. It has been further held that if the departmental proceedings and criminal case are based on similar set of facts and charges in criminal case against delinquent employees is of grave nature which involves complicated questions of fact and law, it would be desirable to stay the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT