W.P.(Crl.) No. 120 of 2012 and W.P.(C) Nos. 463, 515 of 2012 and 283 of 2013. Case: Manohar Lal Sharma Vs The Principal Secretary and Ors.. Supreme Court

Case Number:W.P.(Crl.) No. 120 of 2012 and W.P.(C) Nos. 463, 515 of 2012 and 283 of 2013
Party Name:Manohar Lal Sharma Vs The Principal Secretary and Ors.
Judges:R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph, JJ.
Issue:Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 - Section 8; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Section 4(1); Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 172(2)
Citation:2014 (4) SCALE 618
Judgement Date:March 10, 2014
Court:Supreme Court
 
FREE EXCERPT

Judgment:

  1. On the scope of Section 8 of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, particularly Clauses (a), (b) and (c) of Sub-section (1) thereof and Section 4 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, although preliminary comments of Mr. Anil B. Divan, learned senior counsel for Central Vigilance Commission, Mr. Amrendra Sharan, learned senior counsel for Central Bureau of Investigation and Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Learned Counsel for the petitioners in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 463 of 2012, have been heard, but full hearing in this regard could not be completed. List the matters on March 28, 2014 at 2 P.M.

    Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 4339 of 2014 in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 120 of 2012

  2. Let C.B.I. respond to the application within fifteen days.

  3. List this application on March 28, 2014.

    Interlocutory Application Nos. 7 & 8 of 2014 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 463 of 2012

  4. Having regard to the issue raised in these interlocutory applications, we are of the view that it would be appropriate if the applicant files substantive Writ Petition for redressal of his grievances.

  5. In light of the above, Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel for the applicant, seeks withdrawal of these...

To continue reading

REQUEST YOUR TRIAL