BAIL APPLN.--1113/2019. Case: MANISH Vs. STATE. High Court of Delhi (India)

Case NumberBAIL APPLN.--1113/2019
CitationNA
Judgement DateMay 22, 2019
CourtHigh Court of Delhi (India)

$~5

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Judgment delivered on: 22.05.2019

+ BAIL APPLN. 1113/2019

MANISH ..... Petitioner

versus

STATE ..... Respondent

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Sangwan, Adv.

For the Respondent : Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP with ASI Krishna,

P.S.Mangol Puri.

CORAM:-

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

  1. Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.54/2019 under Section 376 IPC, Police Station Mangol Puri.

  2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner and prosecutrix were neighbours and known to each other for over years. It is alleged that they wanted to get married and had informed their respective families about their relationship and the fact that they wanted to get married.

  3. It is further alleged that in August, 2017 the petitioner took

    prosecutrix to his house and forcibly made physical relationship also promised that he would marry her and thereafter it is alleged that on the false pretext to marry they had physical relations several times. It is further alleged that after about one year he left the petitioner, changed his address and about 3-4 days prior to the making of complaint the prosecutrix came to know that he was getting engaged to someone else because of which, it is alleged that, she consumed disinfectant and was admitted in hospital.

  4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner been falsely implicated. He submits that the allegation is that relationship was established on a false pretext to marry, whereas is no material to show that either there was any physical relationship or there was any promise to marry.

  5. Learned counsel further submits that there is substantial in lodging a complaint in as much as the allegation is that relationship was established in August, 2017 and complaint is made in January, 2019 and even as per the allegations petitioner is alleged to...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT