Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

EX.P.--338/2014. Case: MAHENDRA VERMA Vs. AJAY SURESH KILACHAND & ORS. High Court of Delhi (India)

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Case NumberEX.P.--338/2014
CitationNA
Judgement DateAugust 29, 2016
CourtHigh Court of Delhi (India)

$~27.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EX.P. 338/2014 and E.A. 717/2014, 357/2015

MAHENDRA VERMA ..... Decree Holder

Through: Ms. Vatsala Kak, Advocate with

Mr. Sumesh Dhawan and Ms. Tannya Baranwal, Advocates

versus

AJAY SURESH KILACHAND & ORS ..... Judgement Debtors

Through: None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

O R D E R % 29.08.2016

  1. Vide order dated 01.12.2015, while directing the Registry to another copy of the file alongwith a copy of the decree sheet for transferred to the Senior Civil Judge, Bombay City Civil Court, by post, the postal authorities were directed to furnish the relevant with regard to the fate of the said article. The said order was passed of the submission made by the counsel for the Decree Holder that relevant records did not reach the Bombay Civil Court.

  2. It has been recorded in the order dated 11.02.2016 that the Superintendent of Post Offices, Central Division, Delhi, had appeared handed over a letter dated 21.01.2016 alongwith the delivery slip, revealed that the article in question had been delivered to the addressee

    17.07.2015. The said letter was taken on record. As none was present

    EX.P.338/2014 Page 1 of 2

    behalf of the Decree Holder on the said date, the matter was adjourned today.

  3. Counsel for the Decree Holder states that she would need a the proof of dispatch/receipt of the article in question to place the before the Senior Civil Judge, Bombay City Civil...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT