Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

I.A. Nos. 4, 13-14, 16 in W.P. (Cl) No. 737/2013, I.A. Nos. 18, 19 and 45 and I.A. No..... Case: Lipika Gupta Vs Union of India (UOI). Supreme Court (India)

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Case NumberI.A. Nos. 4, 13-14, 16 in W.P. (Cl) No. 737/2013, I.A. Nos. 18, 19 and 45 and I.A. No....
JudgesH.L. Dattu, R.K. Agrawal and Arun Mishra, JJ.
IssueEducational Law
Citation2014 (9) SCALE 214
Judgement DateJuly 15, 2014
CourtSupreme Court (India)

Judgment:

I.A. No. 4/2013:

  1. Pursuant to the directions issued by this Court on 3.12.2013, the State of Madhya Pradesh has filed its Scheme on 28.06.2014. Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, learned senior Counsel appearing for the non-applicant in I.A. No. 4/2013 requires a reasonable time to respond to the Scheme that is filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh. The request appears to be reasonable and if it is granted it would not cause prejudice to any one of the parties. Therefore, the matter stands adjourned by 10 days in order to enable the non-applicant to file their response.

  2. Call the matter after 10 days.

    I.A. Nos. 13-14/2014:

  3. The M.C.I. is permitted to file its reply in a day's time.

  4. Call the matter on 21st July, 2014.

  5. Reply, if any, be filed to the prayers made in I.A. Nos. 13-14 on or before 21st July, 2014.

    I.A. No. 18/2014:

  6. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, learned Counsel accepts notice for Dental Council of India, Shri R. Balasubramanian, learned Counsel accepts notice on behalf of Union of India and Shri Ramesh Babu, M.R., learned Counsel accepts notice for the State of Kerala.

  7. Call...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT