Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

Original Application No.200/00363/2017. Case: Ku. Shivani Paras and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.. Central Administrative Tribunal

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Case NumberOriginal Application No.200/00363/2017
CounselFor Appellant: Shri S.K. Nandy, Adv. and For Respondents: Shri S.P. Singh, Adv.
JudgesShri N.K. Balakrishnan, Judicial Member and Shri O.P.S. Malik, Administrative Member
IssueAdminisatrative Law
Judgement DateMay 11, 2017
CourtCentral Administrative Tribunal

Order:

Shri N.K. Balakrishnan, JM.

  1. Heard the both the sides.

  2. The learned counsel for the applicants contends that the applicants are the children of the deceased employee. They also contend that the fourth respondent, the mother of the applicants was missing for several years and all of a sudden, she appeared before the respondent-department and claimed disbursement of pension and other retirement benefits.

  3. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that respondent No.4 is not maintaining the applicants and they are not taking care of the applicants. It is further contended that if gratuity, PF and other retiral benefits are disbursed to respondent No.4, the applicants will not get anything. Even if Respondent No.4 is the nominee her right is only to collect the amount. The amounts (other...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT