Case nº A.A.R. No. 1033 of 2010 of Authority for Advance Rulings, August 27, 2012 (case In re: HESS ACC Systems B.V, Aluminiumsteden 10, 7547 TN Enschede Postbox 10063, 7504 Pb Enschede The Netherlands Vs)

PresidentMr. P.K. Balasubramanyan, (Chairman)
Resolution DateAugust 27, 2012

Judgment:

Mr. P.K. Balasubramanyan, (Chairman)

  1. The applicant, a company, claiming to be a resident of The Netherlands has approached this Authority with the present application under section 245Q of the Income-tax Act, seeking advance rulings on the questions formulated in the application. According to the applicant, it entered into a contract with Grasim Industries Ltd., Mumbai on 7.8.2008 for supply of machinery, spare and wearing parts and technical documentation for the production of Autoclared Areated Concrete. On the same day, it entered into another contract with Grasim Industries Ltd for the supply of project service for erection and installation of the machinery supplied as against the first contract. The contract for supply of machinery has been fulfilled by 5.12.2009. According to the applicant, for payments received by it from Grasim thereunder, the liability under section 195 of the Act did not arise. The fulfillment of the second contract on which now ruling is sought is to commence from March 2011. According to the applicant, for receipt by it of the consideration thereunder, the withholding provision under section 195 of the Act will have no application as what it renders under the contract, though technical services, is really services that are ancillary and subsidiary as well as inextricably and essentially linked to the sale of property. Hence it is excluded under from taxation. It is in this context that the applicant approached this Authority with the present application.

  2. After hearing the applicant and the Revenue, this Authority allowed the application under section 245R(2) of the Act to render a ruling on the following question even while reserving for consideration the question whether the transaction is one designed for avoidance of tax in India when considering the application under section 245R(4) of the Act for a ruling.

    Whether the payment under the Contract No. A30.02411.2-PS dated 7th August 2008 entered into between Grasim Industries Ltd. And HESS ACC System B.V. (HESS) for supply of project services in relation to the Machinery sold by HESS to the purchaser (Grasim Industries Limited, Mumbai, India) are chargeable to tax under section 195 of Income-tax Act, 1961 or as per Article 12 para 5 read with para 6.(a) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) with the Netherlands?

  3. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the two contracts were entered into the same day and the contract that...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT