Frist Appeal No. 850 of 2014. Case: IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Balwan Singh. Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Case NumberFrist Appeal No. 850 of 2014
CounselFor Appellant: G.D. Gupta, Advocate and For Respondents: J.S. Yadav, Advocate
JudgesR.K. Bishnoi, Member (J) and Urvashi Agnihotri, Member
IssueConsumer Law
CitationII (2015) CPJ 102 (Har.)
Judgement DateWednesday January 28, 2015
CourtHaryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Order:

R.K. Bishnoi, Member (J)

  1. There is a delay of 402 days in filing the appeal, wherein it is alleged by the appellant that impugned order dated 4.7.2013 came to its notice on 5.9.2014 when the bailable warrants issued by District Forum, Rewari for 12.9.2014 were received at the office. While initiating ex parte proceedings against it, learned District Forum mentioned in the order that the notice sent to effect service was not received back with or without report, whereas no notice was ever received by it. Thereafter the documents were collected and appeal was filed. The delay is not intentional and the same may be condoned.

    Arguments heard. File perused.

    The appellant-opposite parties (OPs) were proceeded ex parte vide order dated 12.2.2013 which is as under:

    "Present: Mr. Mahesh Yadav, Advocate for complainant. None for OP.

    ...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT