Criminal Revn. Appln. No. 123 of 1995. Case: Dilip s/o Ramchandra Umare Vs State of Maharashtra. High Court of Bombay (India)
| Case Number | Criminal Revn. Appln. No. 123 of 1995 |
| Counsel | For Applicant: Smt. K. V. Sirpurkar, Adv. and For Respondents: K. S. Dhote, A.P.P., Adv. |
| Judges | R. M. Lodha, J. |
| Issue | Criminal Procedure Code (2 of 1974) - Sections 386, 389, 397, 360; Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) - Section 354 |
| Citation | 1996 CriLJ 721 |
| Judgement Date | August 24, 1995 |
| Court | High Court of Bombay (India) |
Judgment:
-
Heard Smt. K. V. Sirpurkar, learned counsel for the applicant. Rule returnable forthwith. Shri K. S. Dhote, Additional Public Prosecutor, waives service on behalf of the State. At the request of both the learned counsel, this revision application is heard and disposed of at this stage finally.
-
The first and foremost point which requires to be considered before I advert to the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant is whether the lower appellate Court under the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 has power to suspend the sentence or grant bail to enable the accused to prefer revision application before High Court after the appeal against the conviction and sentence has been decided. In large number of cases, it has been found that the Sessions Judge, Additional Sessions Judge, the Joint Sessions Judge, or the lower appellate Court as the case may be, suspends the sentence for some time even after disposal of appeal against the conviction and sentence to enable the accused to prefer revision application before High Court and obtain appropriate orders. The Code of Criminal Procedure does not confer any inherent jurisdiction on the lower appellate Court to directly or indirectly suspend the sentence after decision of the appeal. Nor there is any specific power conferred on the lower appellate Court under the Code of Criminal Procedure to suspend the sentence on decision of appeal against the Judgement of conviction and sentence. Obviously, the power of suspension of sentence can only be exercised if the Code of Criminal Procedure so permits and not otherwise. There is neither any power of suspension of sentence nor grant of bail implicit in the lower appellate Court after decision of the appeal against the judgement of conviction and sentence, nor such power is inherent. Once the lower appellate Court hears and decides the appeal against the conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court, it becomes functus officio and ceases to have any power in the matter to suspend the sentence or grant bail even temporarily to enable the accused to approach High Court by filing revision application and to obtain appropriate orders from High Court.
-
Smt. Sirpurkar, the learned Counsel for the applicant, however, submits that such power is vested in the lower appellate Court and even after the appeal against the conviction and sentence is decided by the lower appellate Court and the sentence is maintained or modified, the lower appellate Court has power to suspend the sentence, and in that connection she relies upon the provisions of Sections 386(e) and 389(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Shri Dhote, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial