Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

W.P.(C)--10240/2017. Case: BALRAM MEENA Vs. RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE AND ANR.. High Court of Delhi (India)

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Case NumberW.P.(C)--10240/2017
CitationNA
Judgement DateFriday December 06, 2019
CourtHigh Court of Delhi (India)

$~

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Reserved on: 26th November, 2019

Decided on: 6th December, 2019

WP(C) 10240/2017

BALRAM MEENA .....

Through: Mr. N.S.Dalal with Ms. and Mr.Manu Kharra,

versus

RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE AND ANR. .....Respondents

Through: Mr.Jitendra K.Singh,

Counsel with Mr.Amit Kumar Mr.Saurav Sharma, Advocates.

CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR

JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH

J U D G M E N T Dr. S. Muralidhar, J. :

  1. The Petitioner challenges an order dated 22nd August, 2017 passed Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force terminating his services as Constable.

  2. This is the third round of litigation.

  3. Pursuant to an advertisement issued in 2011 the Petitioner applied post of Constable. He was duly called for in the selection and was appointed as Constable by a letter dated 1st October, 2014. By an order dated 15th

    W.P.(C) 10240/2017 Page 1

    2015 his selection stood cancelled on the ground that he had information concerning his involvement in the criminal case (Case No. of 2004) under Sections 147/323/341/149 IPC at Police Station District Alwar, Rajasthan and in respect of which a charge-sheet had filed in the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Rajgarh on 21st June, 2004.

  4. In terms of the judgment dated 24th January, 2012, the ACJM acquitted the Petitioner and others giving them the benefit of doubt Sections 147 and 149 IPC. As regards...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT