First Appeal No. A/10/376 (Arisen out of Order Dated 23/02/2010 in Case No. 485/09 of District Satara). Case: 1. Rajaram Shrirang Bhosale, 2. Sou. Shakuntala Rajaram Bhosale Vs 1. Chairman, Shrimant Malojiraji Sahakari Bank Limited, Satara, 2. General Manager, Shrimant Malojiraje Sahakari Bank Limited, 3. Branch Officer, Shrimant Malojiraji Sahakari Bank Limited, 4. Accountant, Shrimant Malojiraje Sahakari Bank Limited. Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
| Case Number | First Appeal No. A/10/376 (Arisen out of Order Dated 23/02/2010 in Case No. 485/09 of District Satara) |
| Judges | P. N. Kashalkar (Member) & S. P. Lale (Member) |
| Issue | Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act - Section 101 |
| Judgement Date | February 02, 2011 |
| Court | Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission |
Judgment:
S. P. Lale (Member)
This appeal is filed by org. complainants against the dismissal order dated 23/02/2010 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Satara (hereinafter referred to as 'District Consumer Forum' for brevity) in consumer complaint No.485/2009.
According to the complainants, they had kept certain amount in the Fixed Deposit with Opponent No.1/Shrimant Malojiraje Sahakari Bank Ltd. in "Dam Duppat Yojana". According to the complainants on maturity date, opponent Nos.1to4 failed to pay the maturity amount to the complainants. Therefore, complainants filed consumer complaint before the District Consumer Forum for deficiency in service. Opponents filed their written version and contested the claim of the complainants. They pleaded that complainant No.1 is Ex-employee of opponent No.1/Bank and he had obtained two types of loan from the opponent/Bank and he is defaulter in repaying the loan amount. Therefore, opponent No.1 has filed a case before the Co-operative Court and obtained a Recovery Certificate under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act and finally, opponents prayed for dismissal of complaint.
After perusing documents and affidavits placed before it and after hearing both the parties, Learned District Consumer Forum dismissed the complaint.
We heard Mr.Anand Bokefode, Proxy Advocate for Mr.Vinod Jadhav, Advocate for the appellants and Mr.U.B. Wavikar, Advocate for the respondents.
It is an admitted fact that the complainants had kept certain amount in the Fixed...
To continue reading
Request your trial