Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

Appeal No. 38 of 2013 And Appeal No. 39 of 2013. Case: 1. K. Nirmala, 2. K. Nirupama Vs Securities and Exchange Board of India. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Case NumberAppeal No. 38 of 2013 And Appeal No. 39 of 2013
CounselFor Appellant: Mr. Deepak Dhane, Advocate and For Respondents: Mr. Kumar Desai, Advocate with Mr. Mihir Mody, Mr. Akhilesh Singh, Advocates
JudgesJog Singh, Member
IssueSecurities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 151, 15A(b); Securities and Exchange Board of India (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and Imposing Penalties by the Adjudicating Officer) Rules, 1995 - Rule 3; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 8(A)(2),...
Judgement DateApril 18, 2013
CourtSecurities and Exchange Board of India

Judgment:

Jog Singh, Member (Oral)

  1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties both the appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

  2. Appeal no. 38 of 2013 is taken as leading case for the fact purposes. The appellants are promoters and the shareholders of the company in question i.e. Shriniwas Power & Infrastructure Limited which is listed on Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (BSE). The respondent found some irregularity pertaining to the matter of pledges of large number of shares by the two appellants and as such after issuing show cause notices to both of them in the adjudicating proceedings conducted under Section 15I of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 read with Rule 3 of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and Imposing Penalties by the Adjudicating Officer) Rules, 1995. By order dated November 30, 2012, the learned adjudicating officer came to the conclusion that it was a fit case where penalty of ` 3,25,000/- should be imposed on the appellant in appeal no. 38 of 2013 and penalty of ` 3,00,000/- on the appellant in appeal no. 39 of 2013 under Section 15A(b) of SEBI Act for violation of the provisions of Regulations 8(A)(2) and 8(A)(3) of the Securities and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT