Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

Case nº Revision Petition No. 2610 of 2015 of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, December 03, 2015 (case 1. Blenzor (India), 2. Blenzor(India) India Through Its Partner Santosh Sawant India Now, Maharashtra Vs 1. M/S. Niklesh Cooking Oil Refineries & Anr. Through Its Partner Kamal Shorewala, S/O Sh. Prem Chand Shorewala, 2. Canara Bank, Through Its Branch Manager, Kaithal Haryana)

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JudgeFor the Petitioner: Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Advocate And For the Respondent: For the Respondent No.1: Mr. Vikram Singh Multani and Mr.Gaurav Mittal, Advs. For the Respondent No.2: NEMO
PresidentMr. V.K. Jain, Presiding Member
Resolution DateDecember 03, 2015
Issuing OrganizationNational Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Order:

This revision petition is directed against the order of the State Commission dated 26.08.2015 whereby the State Commission declined to condone the delay in filing the appeal of the petitioner against the order of the District Forum. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that they came to know of the order of the District Forum only on 08.03.2015, the appeal was filed on 21.04.2015 and there is no documentary proof of the petitioner company which was served prior to the date aforesaid date. Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, the revision petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside subject to payment of `10,000/- as cost to the complainant/respondent. Subject to the payment of the cost, the State Commission shall proceed to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner on merits. The parties are directed to appear before the State Commission on 07.01.2016. The cost shall be paid to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT