Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

Case nº Revision Petition No. 312/ 313/ 314 Of 2017, (Against the Order dated 18/10/2016 in Appeal No. 1082/2003 of the State Commission Maharastra) of NCDRC Cases, April 18, 2017 (case 1. Anil 2. Ashok 3. Sau. Maya Vs Ajay & Ors.)

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JudgeFor Appellant: Mr. Kishor K. Bhangde, Advocate
PresidentMr. D.K. Jain,President and Mrs. M. Shreesha,Member
Resolution DateApril 18, 2017
Issuing OrganizationNCDRC Cases

Order:

These three Revision Petitions, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short "the Act"), by the Complainants, are directed against the common order dated 18.10.2016 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Circuit Bench at Nagpur (for short "the State Commission") in First Appeals No.03/1082, 15/215 and 15/216. By the said common order, the State Commission has affirmed the orders dated 07.06.2003 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Nagpur (for short "the District Forum") in Complaint Cases No.80, 110 and 111 of 1999. By the said order, the District Forum had dismissed the Complaints filed by the Complainants, alleging deficiency in service on the part of the Respondents, the Opposite Parties in the Complaints, in not delivering the Share Certificates in respect of shares of "good companies" which they were asked to purchase for them, against the amounts, ranging between `5,000/- to `55,000/- paid by them to the Respondents, on the ground that the Complaints involved complicated questions, and for deciding the issues raised in the Complaints, extensive evidence, by examination of the witnesses, would be required.

As noted above, the State Commission has affirmed the orders passed by the District Forum on the afore-noted ground as well as on the ground that the Complaints were barred by limitation as well.

Having heard learned Counsel, appearing for the Petitioners, for some time and perused the documents on record, we are of the view that there is no substance in all these Revision Petitions.

Referring us to some ledger accounts, maintained by the Respondents in their Books of account in respect of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT