Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

Appeal No. 132 of 2013. Case: 1. AEONIAN Investments Company Ltd., 2. Amit Champaklal Choksey, 3. Amit C. Choksey HUF, 4. Abhiraj Trading & Investments Pvt. Ltd., 5. Namrata Amit Choksey, 6. Ankita Amit Choksey, 7. Smt. Priti A. Choksey, 8. Shri Dhiren P. Mehta, 9. Shri Bhanushankar R. Trivedi, 10. Shri Manubhai G. Patel, 11. Shri Bipin V. Jhaveri, 12. Shri Vispi Patel Vs Securities and Exchange Board of India. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Document Cited in Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Case NumberAppeal No. 132 of 2013
Party Name1. AEONIAN Investments Company Ltd., 2. Amit Champaklal Choksey, 3. Amit C. Choksey HUF, 4. Abhiraj Trading & Investments Pvt. Ltd., 5. Namrata Amit Choksey, 6. Ankita Amit Choksey, 7. Smt. Priti A. Choksey, 8. Shri Dhiren P. Mehta, 9. Shri Bhanushankar R. Trivedi, 10. Shri Manubhai G. Patel, 11. Shri Bipin V. Jhaveri, 12. Shri Vispi Patel Vs Securities and Exchange Board of India
CounselFor Appellant: Mr. Rohan Rajyadhyaksha, Advocate and For Respondents: Mr. Shiraz Rustomjee, Senior Advocate with Ms. Najma Sheikh, Mr. Satish Dikshit, Mr. Manish Acharya, Advocates
JudgesJ. P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer, Jog Singh, Member and A. S. Lamba, Member
IssueSecurities and Exchange Board of India Act
Judgement DateAugust 29, 2013
CourtSecurities and Exchange Board of India

Order:

J. P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer

  1. The appellants have approached this Tribunal for the following reliefs:-

    1. Allow the present appeal

    2. Quash and set aside the impugned order.

    3. During the pendency and till final disposal of the present appeal, this Hon'ble Tribnal may be pleased to:

      (i) grant stay of the effect operation and implementation of the impugned order to the extent that it passes interim directions against the appellants.

      (ii) grant exemption to the promoters and directors of appellant no. 1 from the application of paragraph 17 of the impugned order.

      (iii) pass ex-parte ad-interim relief in terms of prayers (d)(i) to d(ii) above.

    4. grant costs of this appeal;

    5. pass such other order and give such other directions as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit in the interest of justice.

  2. The appellants herein challenging the impugned order dated June 4, 2013...

To continue reading

Request your trial