Your World of Legal Intelligence
 India | 1-800-335-6202

Case nº Revision Petition No. 2911 Of 2016, (Against the Order dated 28/09/2016 in Appeal No. 35/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) of NCDRC Cases, October 25, 2016 (case 1. Aay Emm Creations and Anr. 2. 2. Arvind Mahajan Vs Ravinder Pal Singh)

Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JudgeFor Appellant: Mr. Vivek Sehgal, Adv.
PresidentMr. D.K. Jain,President and Mrs. M. Shreesha,Member
Resolution DateOctober 25, 2016
Issuing OrganizationNCDRC Cases

Order:

This Revision Petition, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short "the Act"), by the Opposite Parties in the Complaint, is directed against the order dated 28.09.2016, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, UT at Chandigarh (for short "the State Commission") in Revision Petition No.35 of 2016. By the impugned order, while granting one opportunity to the Petitioners to file their Written Versions in the Consumer Complaint No.306 of 2016, the State Commission has directed the Petitioners to pay to the Complainant `2,500/- as costs.

The short grievance of the Petitioners in this Revision Petition is that since they had not been properly served with the notice in the Complaint and the Complaint itself was not maintainable inasmuch as a similar Complaint had earlier been dismissed as withdrawn, the imposition of costs on the Petitioners was not warranted...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT