Supreme Court

Decision Type

Latest documents

• Civil Appeal No. 4918, 4919, 4920, 4921, 4922 of 2017, (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 2140, 4261, 4319, 4356, 4249 of 2017). Case: Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Ghaziabad. Supreme Court

  1. Assessee in all these appeals is Honda SIEL Cars Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessee"). Question of law that is raised is also identical. Five appeals are filed only because of the reason that same issue has occurred in different Assessment Years, i.e., for the years 1999-2000, 2001-2002, 2002-2003, 2003-2004 and 2005-2006. 2. M/s.

• Criminal Appeal No. 965 of 2017, (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 3651 of 2017). Case: V. Shantha Vs State of Telangana and Ors.. Supreme Court

  2. The appellant assails the order of preventive detention of her husband dated 17.10.2016, passed by Respondent No.2, under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 (Act No.1 of 1986) (Telangana Adaptation) Order, 2015, (G.O.Ms.No.124, D...

• Criminal Appeal No. 560 of 2014. Case: Anjan Kumar Sarma & Ors. Vs State of Assam. Supreme Court

  1. The Appellants along with Jitendra Nath Kakati alias Jit Kakati were charged for committing offences under Section 302, 376 (2) (g), 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ''IPC''). Accused Jit Kakati was separately charged under Section 366-A IPC. The Appellants and Jit Kakati were acquitted of a...

• Criminal Appeal No. 1345, 1346 of 2012. Case: 1. Chandrasekar and another, 2. Balasubramanian Vs State of Tamil Nadu. Supreme Court

  2. The statement of the injured, PW-1 Lalbahadur Sastri, brother-in-law of the deceased Gnanasekaran, was recorded by the Sub-Inspector of Police at the Udumalpet Government Hospital on 17.07.2007 at 10:00 AM with regard to the assault made by the appellants on the deceased and the witness, the same morning at 7:30 AM. The motive was ascribed to th...

• Suo Motu Contempt Petition (C) No. 1/2017 and SLP (C) No. 14842/2015. Case: In Re: Justice C.S. Karnan Vs. Supreme Court

  1. We have heard Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior Counsel representing the State of West Bengal, with reference to the medical examination of Sri Justice C.S. Karnan, as also, Mr. Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned senior Counsel representing the Registrar General, High Court of Judicature a...

• Civil Appeal Nos. 6468-69 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 14697-14698 of 2016), Civil Appeal Nos. 6471-72 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 24460-61 of 2016) and Civil Appeal No. 6470 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 9467 of 2016). Case: Parle Agro (P) Ltd. and Ors. Vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Trivandrum and Ors.. Supreme Court

  4. Civil Appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 14697-98 of 2016 and SLP(C) No. 9467 of 2016 are between the same parties whereas Civil Appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 24460-61 of 2016 have been filed by different Appellants. Civil Appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 14697-98 of 2016 5. The Appellant-M/s. Parle Agro (P) Ltd. is a dealer engaged...

• Civil Appeal No. 6799 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 31682 of 2016). Case: Lisie Medical Institutions Vs The State of Kerala and Ors.. Supreme Court

  1. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 18.07.2016 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court in Writ Appeal No. 1386 of 2016 which was filed by the Appellant herein challenging the order of the learned single Judge whereby the writ petition of the Petitioner has been dismissed. We may mention at the outset that the Appellant (M/s.

• Civil Appeal Nos. 1353-1354 of 2017 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 35104-35105 of 2016) and Civil Appeal No. 1355 of 2017 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 36308 of 2016). Case: Consortium of Titagarh Firema Adler, S.P.A., Titagarh Wagons Ltd. through Authorized Signatory, West Bengal Vs Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., through its General Manager (Procurement) and Ors.. Supreme Court

  1. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., the 1st Respondent herein, issued a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) on 25.01.2016 for the work of design, manufacture, supply, testing, commissioning of 69 passenger rolling stock (Electrical Multiple Units) and training of personnel at Nagpur Metro Rail Project. The said project is being funded by KfW Developmen...

• Civil Appeal No. 6864 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 15253 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C)... CC. No. 9531/2017)). Case: Delhi Development Authority Vs Amarjeet Singh and Ors.. Supreme Court

  3. The issue, in principle, is covered against the Appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No. 8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal No. 5811 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 21545 of 2015. 4. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. 5. In the peculiar facts and circumstanc...

• Civil Appeal No. 6461 of 2017 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 36427 of 2014). Case: Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs B.R. Gupta. Supreme Court

  2. This appeal emanates from the proceedings of an eviction petition filed by the Respondent-landlord on 12.4.2004 Under Sections 14(1)(a),(b), (d) and (h) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short 'the Act') against the Appellant-tenant before the Additional Rent Controller, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, seeking eviction of the Appellant-tenant f...

Featured documents

• Civil Appeal No. 7839, 7840 of 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 9794, 10809 of 2013). Case: 1. Akalakunnam Village Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. and another, 2. Kishore and others Vs Binu N. and others. Supreme Court

  2. These two appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 12.2.2013 passed by the High Court of Kerala dismissing the two writ appeals preferred by the appellants herein challenging the judgment of the Single Judge whereby the writ petition filed by Respondent Nos.1 to 3 was allowed...

• Civil Appeal Nos. 7209 and 7210 of 2004. Case: 1. Bhagat Singh and Ors., 2. Mehar Singh and Ors. Vs Union of India (UOI) and Anr.. Supreme Court

  1. Appellants were owners of the lands situate in village Ghewra. The said lands were acquired for a public purpose, namely construction of L.P.G. Bottling Plant. Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short `the Act') was issued on 18th March, 1985 in terms whereof,...

• Criminal Appeal No. 1345, 1346 of 2012. Case: 1. Chandrasekar and another, 2. Balasubramanian Vs State of Tamil Nadu. Supreme Court

  2. The statement of the injured, PW-1 Lalbahadur Sastri, brother-in-law of the deceased Gnanasekaran, was recorded by the Sub-Inspector of Police at the Udumalpet Government Hospital on 17.07.2007 at 10:00 AM with regard to the assault made by the appellants on the deceased and the witness, the...

• Civil Appeal No. ... of 2011 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 369 of 2010) and Civil Appeal No. of 2011 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 377 of 2010). Case: 1. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd., 2. Airport Authority of India Vs 1. Union of India (UOI) and Ors., [Alongwith Civil Appeal No. of 2011 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1814 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. of 2011 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 10647 of 2010) and Civil Appeal Nos. of 2011 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 9757-9758 of 2010)], 2. Indira Gandhi Airport TDI Karamchari Union and Ors., [Alongwith Civil Appeal No. of 2011 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1713 of 2010)]. Supreme Court

  2. These appeals emanate from the judgment of the High Court of Delhi delivered in LPA No. 38 of 2007, LPA No. 1065 of 2007, Writ Petition (C) No. 139 of 2008 and Writ Petition (C) No. 6763 of 2008 on December 18, 2009. 3. The short question which arises for consideration in these appeals is...

• Civil Appeal No. 4561 of 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 31593 of 2010) and Civil Appeal No. 4562 of 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 31957 of 2010). Case: 1. Geomin Minerals and Marketing (P) Ltd., 2. State of Orissa Vs 1. State of Orissa and Ors., 2. Geomin Minerals and Marketing (P) Ltd. and Ors., [Alongwith Civil Appeal No. 4563 of 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 32040 of 2010)]. Supreme Court

  2. These appeals by special leave have been preferred against the order of Division Bench of Orissa High Court, Cuttack dated 14th July, 2010 in W.P. (C) No. 23 of 2009 whereby the writ petition preferred by Geomin Minerals & Marketing (P) Ltd. was allowed and the recommendation made by the...

• Criminal Appeal No. 1584 of 2012 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 3583 of 2012). Case: 1. Iqbal Abdul Samiya Malek, 2. Henno alias Anwarali Amir Maleq and Ors. Vs State of Gujarat, [Alongwith Criminal Appeal No. 1585 of 2012 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 6260 of 2012)]. Supreme Court

  3. It is the grievance of the Appellants/accused that when they filed regular appeal before the High Court challenging the conviction under Section 302 Indian Penal Code and sentence of life imprisonment, the High Court without going into all the materials including oral and documentary evidence...

• Criminal Appeal No. 635, 1067 of 2006. Case: 1. Krishnegowda and Ors., 2. Nanje Gowda and Anr. Vs State of Karnataka By Arkalgud Police. Supreme Court

  1. These two appeals arise out of a common judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka in Criminal Appeal No. 763/1999 wherein the High Court has set aside the order of acquittal passed by the Trial Court and convicted the accused under various sections of Indian...

• Criminal Appeal No. 782 of 2007. Case: 1. Monica Bedi, 2. Shaik Abdul Sattar, 3. D. Gokari Saheb, 4. Mohd. Yunis Vs State of A.P., Alongwith Criminal Appeal Nos. 783, 784 and 1357 of 2007. Supreme Court

  1. These criminal appeals which are to be disposed of by a common order are directed against the common judgment of the High Court whereunder the High Court confirmed the conviction of the appellants under Section 120B, 419 and 420 IPC and other provisions including under Section 13(1)(d) read with ...

• Civil Appeal Nos. 1345-1346 of 2009 & With Civil Appeal Nos. 1347-1348 of 2009. Case: 1. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., 2. Surendra Nath Loomba Vs 1. Surendra Nath Loomba and Others, 2. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & ors.. Supreme Court

  1. In the present batch of appeals, two preferred by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited and two preferred by claimant, the assail is to the common judgment passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in A.O. No. 201 of 2003 and A.O. No. 284 of 2003 wherein the award dated 19.5.2003...

• Special Leave Petition (C) No.3009 Of 2009 [Along With The Record Of Slp(C) No. 25083/2009] With Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 3029-3031 Of 2009, Special Leave Petition (C) No. 30579 Of 2009. Case: 1. Rajesh Kagra & Ors., 2. Sanjay Khande & Ors., 3. R.L. Bhartiya Vs State Of M.P. & Ors.. Supreme Court

  1. Special Leave Petition(C) No. 3009 of 2009 has been preferred against the order dated 31st July, 2008 passed in Writ Appeal No. 383 of 2008. In Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 3029-3031 of 2009, petitioners assail the order dated 31st July, 2008 passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Writ...