Supreme Court

Decision Type

Latest documents

• W.P.(Crl.) No.-000076-000076 / 2016. Case: NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR VS UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE SECRETARY.. Supreme Court
• Civil Appeal No. 4918, 4919, 4920, 4921, 4922 of 2017, (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 2140, 4261, 4319, 4356, 4249 of 2017). Case: Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Ghaziabad. Supreme Court

  1. Assessee in all these appeals is Honda SIEL Cars Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessee"). Question of law that is raised is also identical. Five appeals are filed only because of the reason that same issue has occurred in different Assessment Years, i.e., for the years 1999-2000, 2001-2002, 2002-2003, 2003-2004 and 2005-2006. 2. M/s.

• Criminal Appeal No. 965 of 2017, (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 3651 of 2017). Case: V. Shantha Vs State of Telangana and Ors.. Supreme Court

  2. The appellant assails the order of preventive detention of her husband dated 17.10.2016, passed by Respondent No.2, under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 (Act No.1 of 1986) (Telangana Adaptation) Order, 2015, (G.O.Ms.No.124, D...

• Criminal Appeal No. 560 of 2014. Case: Anjan Kumar Sarma & Ors. Vs State of Assam. Supreme Court

  1. The Appellants along with Jitendra Nath Kakati alias Jit Kakati were charged for committing offences under Section 302, 376 (2) (g), 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ''IPC''). Accused Jit Kakati was separately charged under Section 366-A IPC. The Appellants and Jit Kakati were acquitted of a...

• Criminal Appeal No. 1345, 1346 of 2012. Case: 1. Chandrasekar and another, 2. Balasubramanian Vs State of Tamil Nadu. Supreme Court

  2. The statement of the injured, PW-1 Lalbahadur Sastri, brother-in-law of the deceased Gnanasekaran, was recorded by the Sub-Inspector of Police at the Udumalpet Government Hospital on 17.07.2007 at 10:00 AM with regard to the assault made by the appellants on the deceased and the witness, the same morning at 7:30 AM. The motive was ascribed to th...

• Civil Appeal No. 6451 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 11707 of 2017). Case: Goel Roadways Vs Indira Lodging Pvt. Ltd.. Supreme Court

  2. The Appellant is the tenant who has suffered the order regarding mesne profits to the tune of Rs. 60,000/- per month. When the matter came up before this Court, having heard the caveator also, a suggestion was put whether the Appellant is willing to surrender vacant possession so as to purchase peace, in which case, the landlord may not claim an...

• Civil Appeal No. 2991 of 2017. Case: Kameng Dolo Vs Atum Welly. Supreme Court

  1. The instant appeal has been preferred Under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for brevity, "the Act") assailing against judgment and order dated 08.02.2017 whereby the High Court of Gauhati had allowed the Election Petition 2 of 2014 filed by the Respondent herein, and declared the election of the Appellant herein, from...

• Suo Motu Contempt Petition (C) No. 1/2017 and SLP (C) No. 14842/2015. Case: In Re: Justice C.S. Karnan Vs. Supreme Court

  1. We have heard Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior Counsel representing the State of West Bengal, with reference to the medical examination of Sri Justice C.S. Karnan, as also, Mr. Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned senior Counsel representing the Registrar General, High Court of Judicature a...

• Civil Appeal No. 6799 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 31682 of 2016). Case: Lisie Medical Institutions Vs The State of Kerala and Ors.. Supreme Court

  1. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 18.07.2016 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court in Writ Appeal No. 1386 of 2016 which was filed by the Appellant herein challenging the order of the learned single Judge whereby the writ petition of the Petitioner has been dismissed. We may mention at the outset that the Appellant (M/s.

• Civil Appeal Nos. 6468-69 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 14697-14698 of 2016), Civil Appeal Nos. 6471-72 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 24460-61 of 2016) and Civil Appeal No. 6470 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 9467 of 2016). Case: Parle Agro (P) Ltd. and Ors. Vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Trivandrum and Ors.. Supreme Court

  4. Civil Appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 14697-98 of 2016 and SLP(C) No. 9467 of 2016 are between the same parties whereas Civil Appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 24460-61 of 2016 have been filed by different Appellants. Civil Appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 14697-98 of 2016 5. The Appellant-M/s. Parle Agro (P) Ltd. is a dealer engaged...

Featured documents

• Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 261 and 539 of 2007. Case: 1. A.K. Behra, 2. P.K. Gaikwad Vs Union of India (UOI) and Anr.. Supreme Court

  1. In the Writ Petition (C) No. 261 of 2007, the petitioner, who is a practicing lawyer and Honorary Secretary of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, Bar Association, prays (1) to quash the decision of the respondents to abolish the post of Vice Chairman in the Central...

• Criminal Appeal Nos. 1475 and 1476 of 2010. Case: 1. Avtar Singh, 2. Kirpal Singh @ Pala and Ors. Vs 1. State of Haryana, 2. State of Haryana and Ors.. Supreme Court

  1. These two appeals arise out of the common judgment dated 27.03.2009 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 916-DB/2006 of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. The second accused is the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 1475/2010. Accused Nos. 4 to 9 are the Appellants in Criminal Appeal...

• Civil Appeal Nos. 2550 and 2551 of 2010. Case: 1. C.M. Thri Vikrama Varma, 2. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. Vs 1. Avinash Mohanty and Ors., 2. Avinash Mohanty and Anr.. Supreme Court

  1. These two appeals by way of special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution are against the impugned judgment of the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated 22.03.2007 in Writ Petition No. 458 of 2007. 2. The facts very briefly are that in the Civil Services Examination, 2004...

• Civil Appeal No.1886 of 2007 with Civil Appeal No. 1858 of 2007. Case: 1. Dalco Engineering Private Limited, 2. Fancy Rehabilitation Trust and Another Vs 1. Shree Satish Prabhakar Padhye and Others, 2. Union of India and Others. Supreme Court

  1. The appellant is a private limited company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The respondent - S.P. Padhye - (also referred to as `the employee') was employed as a Telephone Operator by the appellant for more than two decades. The respondent's service was terminated by ...

• Criminal Appeal No. 2056 of 2014 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 553/2011) and Criminal Appeal Nos. 2057-58 of 2014 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 2203-2204/2011). Case: 1. Edmund S. Lyngdoh, 2. Deva Prasad Sharma Vs 1. State of Meghalaya, 2. Central Bureau of Investigation. Supreme Court

  2. These appeals arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 2203-2204/2011 are filed challenging the judgment of the Gauhati High Court confirming the conviction of the Appellant-first accused (Deva Prasad Sharma) Under Section 420 Indian Penal Code, 120B Indian Penal Code and Section 5(2) of Prevention of...

• Civil Appeal Nos. 6103 and 7372 of 2005. Case: 1. High Court of Judicature, Patna, 2. Shiveshwar Narayan and Anr. Vs 1. Shiveshwar Narayan, 2. High Court of Judicature, Patna and Anr.. Supreme Court

  1. These two appeals, by special leave, are from the judgment dated May 20, 2005 of the High Court of judicature at Patna (for short "the High Court") whereby the Division Bench of that court allowed the Writ Petition filed by Shri Shiveshwar Narayan (for short "Judicial Officer"...

• Criminal Appeal Nos. 1108 and 1109 of 2006. Case: 1. Kanhaiya Lal & Ors., 2. State of Rajasthan Vs 1. State of Rajasthan, 2. Mangi Lal, [Alongwith Criminal Appeal Nos. 1110, 1111 and 1112 of 2006]. Supreme Court

  1. The case of the prosecution depicts a macabre chain of events that occurred in the intervening night of 28th and 29th June, 2001 which eventually led to the massacre of five persons, namely, Purshottam, Ram Kumar Dhaka, Kalu Lal Mali and Lokendra Sharma, all residents of village Railgaon, and...

• Criminal Appeal No. 725 of 2009 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 5419 of 2008), Criminal Appeal Nos. 726-727 of 2009 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) Nos. 6061-6062) and Criminal Appeal Nos. 728-729 of 2009 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) Nos. 6136-6137 of 2008). Case: 1. Manoj Narain Agrawal, 2. Shashi Agrawal and Anr., 3. State of Uttarakhand and etc. Vs 1. Shashi Agrawal and Ors., 2. State of Uttarakhand and Ors., 3. Shashi Agrawal and Ors.. Supreme Court

  Indisputably in relation to an incident which took place on or about 4.11.1999, two First Information Reports were lodged; one on 4.11.1999 and the other on the next day, i.e., 5.11.1999. The first FIR was lodged by Meenaxi Agrawal, (for short, "Meenaxi") inter alia, alleging that Manoj...

• Criminal Appeal No.1010 and 1011 of 2008. Case: 1. Nana Keshav Lagad, 2. Balu and Another Vs State of Maharashtra. Supreme Court

  2. The appellant in Crl.A.No.1010 of 2008 is A4 and the appellants in Crl.A.No.1011 of 2008 are A2 and A3. In all, four accused were prosecuted and convicted by the learned Sessions Judge. The accused preferred an appeal before the High Court against the conviction and sentence imposed on them by...

• Civil Appeal No. 10747 of 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 31690 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 10748 of 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 31695 of 2011) and Civil Appeal No. 10749 of 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 33184 of 2011). Case: 1. Purushotham, 2. Mrs. Ramadevi, 3. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs 1. State of Karnataka and Ors., 2. Bangalore Development Authority and Ors., 3. Subramanya and Ors., [Alongwith Civil Appeal No. 10750 of 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 33319 of 2011)]. Supreme Court

  2. These four appeals arising out of SLP (C) No. 31690 of 2011, SLP (C) No. 31695 of 2011, SLP (C) No. 33184 of 2011 and SLP (C) No. 33319 of 2011, impugn the judgment of a Division Bench of Karnataka High Court rendered in Writ Petition No. 5428 of 2006 (BDA-PIL), and Writ Petition No. 5173 of...