Supreme Court

Decision Type

Latest documents

• W.P.(Crl.) No.-000076-000076 / 2016. Case: NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR VS UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE SECRETARY.. Supreme Court
• Civil Appeal No. 4918, 4919, 4920, 4921, 4922 of 2017, (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 2140, 4261, 4319, 4356, 4249 of 2017). Case: Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Ghaziabad. Supreme Court

  1. Assessee in all these appeals is Honda SIEL Cars Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessee"). Question of law that is raised is also identical. Five appeals are filed only because of the reason that same issue has occurred in different Assessment Years, i.e., for the years 1999-2000, 2001-2002, 2002-2003, 2003-2004 and 2005-2006. 2. M/s.

• Criminal Appeal No. 965 of 2017, (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 3651 of 2017). Case: V. Shantha Vs State of Telangana and Ors.. Supreme Court

  2. The appellant assails the order of preventive detention of her husband dated 17.10.2016, passed by Respondent No.2, under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 (Act No.1 of 1986) (Telangana Adaptation) Order, 2015, (G.O.Ms.No.124, D...

• Criminal Appeal No. 560 of 2014. Case: Anjan Kumar Sarma & Ors. Vs State of Assam. Supreme Court

  1. The Appellants along with Jitendra Nath Kakati alias Jit Kakati were charged for committing offences under Section 302, 376 (2) (g), 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ''IPC''). Accused Jit Kakati was separately charged under Section 366-A IPC. The Appellants and Jit Kakati were acquitted of a...

• Criminal Appeal No. 1345, 1346 of 2012. Case: 1. Chandrasekar and another, 2. Balasubramanian Vs State of Tamil Nadu. Supreme Court

  2. The statement of the injured, PW-1 Lalbahadur Sastri, brother-in-law of the deceased Gnanasekaran, was recorded by the Sub-Inspector of Police at the Udumalpet Government Hospital on 17.07.2007 at 10:00 AM with regard to the assault made by the appellants on the deceased and the witness, the same morning at 7:30 AM. The motive was ascribed to th...

• Civil Appeal No. 6452 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 10715 of 2014). Case: Gangadharan Nair P. and Ors. Vs Bhaskaran M. and Ors.. Supreme Court

  2. The main issue arising for consideration in this case is that there is no compliance of the mandatory provision of Rule 35A (3) of the Kerala Cooperative Society Rules in the matter of conduct of election. of the 12000 voters, only 1390 have voted. 3. On the previous occasions also, the people who participated in the election were only few. I...

• Civil Appeal No. 6461 of 2017 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 36427 of 2014). Case: Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs B.R. Gupta. Supreme Court

  2. This appeal emanates from the proceedings of an eviction petition filed by the Respondent-landlord on 12.4.2004 Under Sections 14(1)(a),(b), (d) and (h) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short 'the Act') against the Appellant-tenant before the Additional Rent Controller, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, seeking eviction of the Appellant-tenant f...

• Civil Appeal No. 6450 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 4385 of 2017). Case: Samir Vidyasagar Bhardwaj Vs Nandita Samir Bhardwaj. Supreme Court

  2. An order passed by the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition(C) No. 169 of 2017 dated 11.01.2017 wherein the High Court affirmed the interim order passed by the Family Court in and by which the Appellant-husband has been directed to remove himself from his own home and not to visit there until the divorce petition is finally decided is under cha...

• Criminal Appeal No. 933 of 2017 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 9829 of 2014). Case: State and Ors. Vs K.S. Palanichamy and Ors.. Supreme Court

  2. Appellant is before us questioning the order passed by the High Court in Crl.O.P. (MD) No. 6607 of 2013, dated 19.03.2014, whereby the High Court has set aside an ad-interim order (G.O. Ms. No. 989) [hereinafter referred to as 'G.O.' for brevity], dated 24.12.2012, attaching the immovable properties of the partners of Financial Establishment (Gl...

• Civil Appeal No. 6448 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 24045 of 2016). Case: Vaishali Abhimanyu Joshi Vs Nanasaheb Gopal Joshi. Supreme Court

  2. This appeal raises an important question pertaining to interpretation of Section 26 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as "Act, 2005") qua the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 (hereinafter to referred to as "Act, 1887") as amended in the State of Maharashtra. The question is as to whether

Featured documents

• Criminal Appeal No. 934-936 of 2013 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 10606-10608 of 2010) and Criminal Appeal No. 937 of 2013 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 3335 of 2012). Case: 1. Arathi Bandi, 2. Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao and Ors. Vs 1. Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao and Ors., 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Anr.. Supreme Court

  2. These appeals arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 10606-10608 of 2010 are directed against the judgment and final order dated 24th September, 2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad in Writ Petition No. 25479 of 2009 issuing a writ in the nature of...

• Civil Appeal No. 5640 of 2004 With Civil Appeal No. 5639 of 2004. Case: 1. Bombay Anand Bhavan Restaurant, 2. Cow and Cane and Another Vs 1. Deputy Director, Esi Corporation and Another, 2. Regional Director, ESI Corporation. Supreme Court

  The appellant in Misc. First Appeal is a proprietorship concern and is engaged in the activity of making and selling coffee, tea and other beverages, and also sweets and savories. It is registered under Shops and Commercial Establishments Act. Sometime in the year 1997 and 1998, the appellant had...

• Civil Appeal Nos. 6988 of 2003 and 4434 of 2004. Case: 1. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai IV, 2. Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-II Vs 1. Ciens Laboratories, Mumbai, 2. Time Pharma, Mumbai. Supreme Court

  1. 'Care or cure', is the clue for the resolution of the lis arising in these cases. If the product by name 'Moisturex' is held to be a medicament for cure, the decision goes in favour of the Assessee and if the product is held to be one for care of the skin, the decision benefits the Central...

• Civil Appeal No. 6057 Of 2010 (Arising Out Of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 9473/2006), Civil Appeal No. 6058 Of 2010 (Arising Out Of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 9474/2006). Case: 1. Dr. Basavaiah, 2. Dr. Manjunath Vs Dr. H. L. Ramesh & Ors.. Supreme Court

  2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 2.8.2005 passed in Writ Appeal No. 5014 of 2004 and dated 22.3.2006 passed in Review Petition Nos. 593, 594 and 632 of 2005 in Writ Appeal No. 5014 of 2004 by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore 3. By this judgment, we...

• Transfer Petition (Crl) No. 27 of 2009 With Transfer Petition (C) No. 342 of 2009. Case: 1. Harpreet Singh Popli and Others, 2. Manmeet Kaur Vs 1. Manmeet Kaur Popli and Another, 2. Harpreet Singh. Supreme Court

  1. By this order, we are disposing of the aforementioned transfer petitions, one of which has been filed by the husband, Shri Harpreet Singh Popli and his relatives for transfer of criminal case arising out of FIR No.443/2008 pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut and the other...

• CMP Nos. 28275 of 1988 and 10664 and 11987 of 1989 and Contempt Petition No. 109 of 1989 and I.A. Nos. 1 of 1989 and 1 and 2 of 1990. Case: 1. Jute Corporation of India Officers' Association, 2. Officers & Supervisors of Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd., 3. The Officers of Cement Corporation of India, 4. Chandron, 5. Officers of F.C.I., 6. The Employees of Engineers India Ltd. and Ors., 7. F.C.I. Vs 1. Jute Corporation of India Ltd. and Anr., 2. Union of India (UOI) and Anr., 3. Union of India (UOI) and Ors., 4. F.C.I. and Ors., 5. F.C.I. and Ors., 6. Engineers India Ltd. and Anr., 7. F.C.I. Employees' Congress and Ors.. Supreme Court

  1. We have heard Mr. Venugopal, Mr. Mukhoty and Mr. Dwivedi as also some of the parties appearing in person on the side of the petitioners and Mr. Ramaswamy, Additional Solicitor General on behalf of Union of India and other respondents. 2. As directed, the counter affidavit has been filed in one...

• Civil Appeal Nos. 6599 and 6600 of 2002. Case: 1. Manager, Matha Nagar School, 2. Greater Cochin Development Authority Vs 1. Greater Cochin Development Authority and Ors., 2. The Manager, Matha Nagar School and Ors.. Supreme Court

  1. C.A. No. 6599/2002 is filed by Matha Nagar School, Cochin, (for short 'the School') where the issue involved is the validity of a demand for Rs. 76,48,237/- by the Greater Cochin Development Authority (`GCDA' for short) towards the cost 50.44 Ares of of land delivered by GCDA to the school. C.A. ...

• C.A. Nos. 2853, 2854 and 2855 of 2002. Case: 1. Mutha Associates and Ors., 2. Pralhad Lokram Dodeja and Ors. Vs 1. State of Maharashtra and Ors., 2. Agricultural Produce Market Committee and Ors., [Alongwith Civil Appeal Nos. 2856-2857 of 2002]. Supreme Court

  1. These appeals by special leave arise out of a common judgment and Order dated 9th April, 2001 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay whereby the High Court has dismissed Writ Petition No. 670 of 1996 and upheld a notification dated 13th November, 1987 issued under...

• Civil Appeal Nos. 6900-6906 and 6907-6946 of 2001. Case: 1. Pinninti Kistamma and Ors., 2. Duvvada Parsuram Chowdary and Ors. Vs 1. Duvvada Parsuram Chowdary and Ors., 2. Pinninti Kistamma and Ors.. Supreme Court

  1. These two batches of appeals are directed against the judgment and decree dated 27th of March, 1997 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Second Appeal Nos. 361 of 1996 & batch and Second Appeal Nos. 374 of 1996 & batch and also against the judgment and order dated...

• Civil Appeal No.5160 of 2013, (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.354 of 2012). Case: 1. Ramanlal Deochand Shah, 2. Kantilal Manikchand Shah, (since deceased by his L.Rs.) Vs 1. The State of Maharashtra & Anr., (With Civil Appeal No.5161 of 2013 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.395 of 2012)), 2. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.. Supreme Court

  2. These appeals arise out of two separate but similar orders dated 14th June, 2011 and 16th March, 2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay whereby First Appeal Nos.179 of 1992 and 751 of 1992 filed by the respondent-State of Maharashtra have been allowed and the judgment and order...