Supreme Court

Decision Type

Latest documents

• Civil Appeal No. 4918, 4919, 4920, 4921, 4922 of 2017, (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 2140, 4261, 4319, 4356, 4249 of 2017). Case: Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Ghaziabad. Supreme Court

  1. Assessee in all these appeals is Honda SIEL Cars Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessee"). Question of law that is raised is also identical. Five appeals are filed only because of the reason that same issue has occurred in different Assessment Years, i.e., for the years 1999-2000, 2001-2002, 2002-2003, 2003-2004 and 2005-2006. 2. M/s.

• Criminal Appeal No. 965 of 2017, (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 3651 of 2017). Case: V. Shantha Vs State of Telangana and Ors.. Supreme Court

  2. The appellant assails the order of preventive detention of her husband dated 17.10.2016, passed by Respondent No.2, under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 (Act No.1 of 1986) (Telangana Adaptation) Order, 2015, (G.O.Ms.No.124, D...

• Criminal Appeal No. 560 of 2014. Case: Anjan Kumar Sarma & Ors. Vs State of Assam. Supreme Court

  1. The Appellants along with Jitendra Nath Kakati alias Jit Kakati were charged for committing offences under Section 302, 376 (2) (g), 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ''IPC''). Accused Jit Kakati was separately charged under Section 366-A IPC. The Appellants and Jit Kakati were acquitted of a...

• Criminal Appeal No. 1345, 1346 of 2012. Case: 1. Chandrasekar and another, 2. Balasubramanian Vs State of Tamil Nadu. Supreme Court

  2. The statement of the injured, PW-1 Lalbahadur Sastri, brother-in-law of the deceased Gnanasekaran, was recorded by the Sub-Inspector of Police at the Udumalpet Government Hospital on 17.07.2007 at 10:00 AM with regard to the assault made by the appellants on the deceased and the witness, the same morning at 7:30 AM. The motive was ascribed to th...

• Civil Appeal Nos. 6468-69 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 14697-14698 of 2016), Civil Appeal Nos. 6471-72 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 24460-61 of 2016) and Civil Appeal No. 6470 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 9467 of 2016). Case: Parle Agro (P) Ltd. and Ors. Vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Trivandrum and Ors.. Supreme Court

  4. Civil Appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 14697-98 of 2016 and SLP(C) No. 9467 of 2016 are between the same parties whereas Civil Appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 24460-61 of 2016 have been filed by different Appellants. Civil Appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 14697-98 of 2016 5. The Appellant-M/s. Parle Agro (P) Ltd. is a dealer engaged...

• Civil Appeal No. 6799 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 31682 of 2016). Case: Lisie Medical Institutions Vs The State of Kerala and Ors.. Supreme Court

  1. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 18.07.2016 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court in Writ Appeal No. 1386 of 2016 which was filed by the Appellant herein challenging the order of the learned single Judge whereby the writ petition of the Petitioner has been dismissed. We may mention at the outset that the Appellant (M/s.

• Civil Appeal Nos. 1353-1354 of 2017 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 35104-35105 of 2016) and Civil Appeal No. 1355 of 2017 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 36308 of 2016). Case: Consortium of Titagarh Firema Adler, S.P.A., Titagarh Wagons Ltd. through Authorized Signatory, West Bengal Vs Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., through its General Manager (Procurement) and Ors.. Supreme Court

  1. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., the 1st Respondent herein, issued a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) on 25.01.2016 for the work of design, manufacture, supply, testing, commissioning of 69 passenger rolling stock (Electrical Multiple Units) and training of personnel at Nagpur Metro Rail Project. The said project is being funded by KfW Developmen...

• Civil Appeal No. 6864 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 15253 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C)... CC. No. 9531/2017)). Case: Delhi Development Authority Vs Amarjeet Singh and Ors.. Supreme Court

  3. The issue, in principle, is covered against the Appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No. 8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal No. 5811 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 21545 of 2015. 4. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. 5. In the peculiar facts and circumstanc...

• Civil Appeal No. 6461 of 2017 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 36427 of 2014). Case: Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs B.R. Gupta. Supreme Court

  2. This appeal emanates from the proceedings of an eviction petition filed by the Respondent-landlord on 12.4.2004 Under Sections 14(1)(a),(b), (d) and (h) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short 'the Act') against the Appellant-tenant before the Additional Rent Controller, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, seeking eviction of the Appellant-tenant f...

• Civil Appeal No. 6452 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 10715 of 2014). Case: Gangadharan Nair P. and Ors. Vs Bhaskaran M. and Ors.. Supreme Court

  2. The main issue arising for consideration in this case is that there is no compliance of the mandatory provision of Rule 35A (3) of the Kerala Cooperative Society Rules in the matter of conduct of election. of the 12000 voters, only 1390 have voted. 3. On the previous occasions also, the people who participated in the election were only few. I...

Featured documents

• Civil Appeal No. 1478 of 2004 With Writ Petition (Civil) No. 150 of 2007 With Writ Petition (Civil) No. 237 of 2007. Case: 1. Allahabad Bank and Another, 2. All India Allahabad Bank Retired Emps. Assn. Vs 1. All India Allahabad Bank Retired Employees Association, 2. Allahabad Bank and Another, 3. Controlling Authority and Another. Supreme Court

  1. All India Allahabad Bank Retired Employees Association (for short 'Association') filed a writ petition invoking the original jurisdiction of the Allahabad High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus directing the appellant bank herein ...

• Criminal Appeal No. 1487 of 2005. Case: 1. Bharama Prasaram Kudhachkar, 2. Amit Rama Naik, 3. Rama Vs State of Karnataka, [Alongwith Criminal Appeal Nos. 739 and 1135 of 2006]. Supreme Court

  2.1 Sudhakar and his wife Shilpa aged 52 and 50 years respectively both deceased in this matter were running abusiness in stones and slabs at 224, Railway Goodshed Road, Belgaum. The factory was on the ground floor whereas the couple were residing on the first floor of the premises. On the 10th of...

• Civil Appeal Nos. 1743 of 2006 and 8899-8901 of 2011. Case: 1. Chandrashekar (D) by L.Rs. and Ors., 2. Basappa (D) and by L.Rs. and Ors. Vs 1. Land Acquisition Officer and Anr., 2. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Gulbarga and Anr. etc. etc.. Supreme Court

  1. Through this common order, we propose to dispose of Civil Appeal No. 1743 of 2006, as also, Civil Appeal Nos. 8899-8901 of 2011. For convenience, the factual position, as has been depicted in Civil Appeal No. 1743 of 2006, has been referred to. 2. Gulbarga Development Authority, consequent upon ...

• Criminal Appeal Nos. 239 and 429 of 2005. Case: 1. Dharnidhar, 2. Ram Sanehi and Ors. Vs 1. State of U.P. and Ors., 2. State of Uttar Pradesh, [Alongwith Criminal Appeal No. 430 of 2005]. Supreme Court

  1. The accused Ram Sanehi, Baladin, Ramadin, Shiv Dayal and Dharnidhar were tried for the murder of two persons differently, namely, Bahadur Singh and his father Pyare Lal in Sessions Trial No. 44 of 1989. The ld. Sessions Judge, Jhansi, vide its judgment dated 7th August, 1992 after finding all...

• Civil Appeal No. 4935 and 4936 of 2006 with Civil Appeal Nos. 4937/2006 and 4938/2006. Case: 1. Ghanshyam Sharma, 2. Suresh Kumar Sharma and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.. Supreme Court

  1. These appeals relate to the claim of the Lower Division Clerks/Upper Division Clerks, who were appointed as regular Stenographers (referred to as "special promotees") on 25.4.1992, under proviso (5A) to Rule 5 of the Rajasthan Secretariat Ministerial Service Rules, 1970 (for short the...

• Criminal Appeal No. 2221 of 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 5623 of 2012), Criminal Appeal No. 2222 of 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 3332 of 2012) and Criminal Appeal No. 2223 of 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 734 of 2013). Case: 1. J.V. Baharuni, 2. Giriraj Proteins Pvt. Ltd., 3. Baldevbhai Ramjibhai Patel Vs 1. State of Gujarat, 2. D.M. Finance, 3. Vishnubhai Hargovindas Patel. Supreme Court

  2. The undisputed facts of the appeal arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 5623 of 2012 are that Appellant No. 2 is the owner of Appellant No. 1 Company. The Respondent No. 2, who is in the business of manufacture, process and marketing of petroleum products, has a 'Company Owned Company Operated'...

• Criminal Appeal No. 662 of 2010 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 6563 of 2007) and Criminal Appeal No. 670 of 2010 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 6821 of 2007). Case: 1. Lalu Prasad Yadav and Anr., 2. Central Bureau of Investigation Vs State of Bihar and Anr.. Supreme Court

  2. Section 378 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, `1973 Code') enacts the provision for appeal from an order of acquittal. The said provision as it existed prior to 2005 amendment reads: "S.378. - Appeal in case of acquittal. - (1) Save as otherwise provided in sub-section (2) ...

• Civil Appeal Nos. 7254-7256 of 2002, Contempt Petition (C) No. 28-29 of 2009 and Civil Appeal Nos. 4641-42/2002. Case: 1. Mrs. Saradamani Kandappan, 2. Mrs. S. Rajalakshmi and Ors. Vs 1. Mrs. S. Rajalakshmi and Ors., 2. Mrs. Saradamani Kandappan and Anr.. Supreme Court

  1. These appeals by special leave (CA Nos. 7254 to 7256 of 2002) are directed against the common judgment and decree dated 19.6.2002 passed by the Madras High Court in O.S.A. Nos. 12 of 1992, 32 of 1995 and 148 of 1999 filed by the Appellant herein against the common judgment dated 29.11.1991...

• Contempt Petition (Crl.) No. 7 of 2010 in Criminal Appeal No. 2323 of 2011 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 666 of 2010) and Criminal Appeal No. 2323 of 2011 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 666 of 2010). Case: 1. P. Mahalingam, 2. Monica Kumar and Anr. Vs 1. Monica Kumar and Anr., 2. State of U.P. and Ors.. Supreme Court

  2. This is an appeal by way of special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution against the order dated 05.12.2009 of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court dismissing the Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 23839 of 2009 of the appellants. 3. The relevant facts as stated in the Special...

• Civil Appeal Nos. 605, 606, 607 and 608 of 2013 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C.) No. 24200 of 2012) and SLP (C) Nos. 24459, 24461 and 25292 of 2012. Case: 1. Rajiv Kapoor and Anr., 2. Manoj Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs 1. Karan Pal Singh, 2. Rajendra Singh. Supreme Court

  After hearing both the parties, I agree with the submissions made by Sri J.N. Mathur, learned Senior Advocate that the said order is prospective in nature. But fact remains that the judicial order is in favour of the Petitioner i.e. the retirement will be subject to outcome of the pending proposal...