National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Jurisdiction/Issuing Court

Latest documents

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 1336 Of 2017, (Against the Order dated 09/03/2017 in Appeal No. 818/2016 of the State Commission Punjab) of NCDRC Cases, June 08, 2017 (case Baljit Kaur Vs Ms. Divine Motors & Anr.)

  This Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner/complainant -- Baljeet Kaur against the order of the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (for Short, ''State Commission) dated 9.3.2017 in FA No.818 of 2016 vide which the appeal had been decided in favour of the appellant/opposite party no.1 -- M/s Divine Motors.

• Case nº First Appeal No. 491 Of 2016, (Against the Order dated 22/04/2016 in Complaint No. 15/2015 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh) of NCDRC Cases, June 02, 2017 (case Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sai Ram Education Trust)

  This First Appeal has been preferred by the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and its Branch Manager, the Opposite Parties in the Complaint, against the order dated 10.03.2016, passed by the Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Shimla (for short "the State Commission") in Complaint Case No. 15 of 2015. By the impugned orde...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 83 Of 2017, (Against the Order dated 03/10/2016 in Appeal No. 712/2016 of the State Commission Maharastra) of NCDRC Cases, May 31, 2017 (case Dr. Mahesh S. Bhatambre Vs Nikhil Mahesh Rodge)

  1. This revision petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 03.10.2016 passed in First Appeal No. 712 of 2016 by Maharasthra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Aurangabad, whereby the State Commission allowed the appeal of the complainant. 2. The brief facts

• Case nº Consumer Case No. 2 Of 2014 of NCDRC Cases, May 30, 2017 (case Mohit Chopra Vs Ms. Unitech Limited & Ors.)

  1. The complainant booked a residential apartment with the OP in a project namely ''Harmony'' which the said OP is developing in Sector-50, Nirvana Country, Gurgaon. Apartment No.1102, admeasuring 3309 sq. ft. in Tower-4 of the above referred project was allotted to him for a total consideration of Rs.1,66,18,875/- and the parties entered into a Bu...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 659 Of 2017, (Against the Order dated 05/08/2016 in Appeal No. 623/2013 of the State Commission Kerala) of NCDRC Cases, May 25, 2017 (case Ms. Cheruvallil Investments and Ors. Vs District Collector, & Anr.)

  1. These two revision petitions have been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the impugned order dated 05.08.2016, passed by the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram (hereinafter referred to as "the State Commission") in Appeals No. 623/2013 and 624/2013, filed by the present pe...

• Case nº First Appeal No. 55 Of 2015, (Against the Order dated 04/12/2014 in Complaint No. 79/2013 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh) of NCDRC Cases, May 25, 2017 (case PNB Metlife Insurance Compamy Ltd. & Anr. Vs Mopidevi Lalitha)

  1. This first appeal has been filed under section 19 read with Section 21(a)(ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the impugned order dated 04.12.2014, passed by the Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as "the State Commission") in Consumer Complaint No. 79/2013, filed by the p...

• Case nº First Appeal No. 1408 Of 2016, (Against the Order dated 12/04/2016 in Complaint No. 153/2014 of the State Commission Punjab) of NCDRC Cases, May 25, 2017 (case Inderpal Singh Sidhu Vs Managing Director, Ms. Eldeco Jalandhar Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.)

  1. This first appeal has been filed under section 19 read with section 21(a)(ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 challenging the impugned order dated 12.04.2016, passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ''the State Commission'') in consumer complaint No. 153/2014 filed by the present appella...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 2409 Of 2014, (Against the Order dated 26/02/2014 in Appeal No. 311/2012 of the State Commission Gujarat) of NCDRC Cases, May 25, 2017 (case Ms. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Irfan Nurmohammad Memon)

  1. This revision petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 26.02.2014, passed by the Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ''the State Commission'') in First Appeal No. 311/2012, "Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. versus Irfan Nurmoham...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 3308 Of 2016, (Against the Order dated 24/08/2016 in Appeal No. 590/2015 of the State Commission Maharastra) of NCDRC Cases, May 24, 2017 (case Anil Ramchandra Babhale Vs Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.)

  1. As per the complaint, the petitioner had started Stone Mine and set up a big plant of Gitti Khadan and Thresher machine. The said Thresher Machine Plant was in the name of M/s Om Crushing Company of which the petitioner was the proprietor. On 31.03.2007, they took an electric connection from the respondent/ opposite party for the said plant. He

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 2329 Of 2015, (Against the Order dated 23/06/2015 in Appeal No. 490/2014 of the State Commission Maharastra) of NCDRC Cases, May 24, 2017 (case Arun Inks Pvt. Ltd Vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd.)

  1. The present revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 23.06.2015 of the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (''the State Commission) in First Appeal no. 490 of 2014. 2. The facts of the case as per the petitioner/ complainant are that the petitioner was a private limited company, which had obtained...

Featured documents

• Case nº First Appeal No. 473 of 2012 of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, August 01, 2013 (case 1. A.S.Chakravarthy, 2. A. Sandhya Chakravarthy Vs M/s. Asvasidh Homes Builder & Developer)

  1. The complaint of the present appellants against respondent/M/s. Asvasidh Homes and its managing partners was dismissed by the AP State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in CCSR/1733/2012. The State Commission came to a conclusion that the complaint was not maintainable before it and...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 2309/2310 Of 2011, (Against the Order dated 11/03/2011 in Appeal No. 371/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh) of NCDRC Cases, July 06, 2012 (case 1. Akhlesh Aggarwal 2. Sakshi Vs Industrial Development Bank Of India and Anr)

  This case had come up for hearing on 09.04.2012. In spite of four adjournments granted including the third adjournment which was granted subject to payment of Rs.2500/- as costs, petitioner did not remove the defects pointed out by the office. Costs were also not paid. On a statement made by the...

• Case nº First Appeal No. 320 of 2013 of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, May 21, 2015 (case 1. Amit Sarkar & Anr. S/O. Sh. A.K. Sarkar, 2. Mrs. Konika Sarkar W/O. Sh. Amit Sarkar Vs 1. Pgimer & 3 Ors. (Pgi), Through Its Medical Superintendent/Direector, 2. Advanced Trauma Centre Of Post Graduate Institute Of Medical Education & Research (Pgi) Through Its Centre Incharge, 3. Dr. Jujhar, Junior Resident, Orthopaedics, Atc, 4. Dr. Murali G. Senior Resident, Department Of Forensic Medicine, Post-Graduate Institute Of Medical Education & Research (Pgi))

  1. Above appeals are being disposed of by this common order, as these appeals arise from common impugned order dated 1.4.2013, passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, U.T. Chandigarh (for short, ''State Commission'') in C.C. No.43 of 2012. 2. Brief facts are, that only daughter of...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 3617 Of 2011, (Against the Order dated 29/07/2011 in Appeal No. 6/2011 of the State Commission Kerala) of NCDRC Cases, September 06, 2012 (case 1. Anil V. Anand and Anr. 2. V.Vijayanand Vs Institute Of Human Resource Development)

  Based on his rank in Kerala Engineering Entrance Examination and counseling by the respondent/opp.party, petitioner No.1/complainant No.1 was offered admission under management quota in Electronics & Communication branch in Model Engineering College, Ernakulam. Petitioner paid a sum of Rs.38,700...

• Case nº Consumer Case No. 1286 of 2016 of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, September 08, 2016 (case 1. Asha Mehta and Anr. 2. Sh. Bhagat Mehta Vs Parsvnath Developers Ltd.)

  Any other or further order/relief as this Hon''ble Forum may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed/granted in favour of the complainants and against the opposite party." 2. On bare reading of the prayer, prima facie it appears that the instant...

• Case nº Mr. V.K. Jain, Presiding Member and Dr. B.C. Gupta, Member of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, September 11, 2015 (case 1. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner and Anr. 2. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs 1. Shyam Sunder Aggarwal)

  1. The respondent/complainant, who was earlier working with Saraswati Sugar Mills, left the service of the aforesaid employer and joined the service of Lodha Offset Printer at Jodhpur. A cheque of Rs.19,85,796/- sent by the previous employer of the complainant was received in the office of the...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 1972/ 1973 of 2013, (Against the Order dated 05/02/2013 in Appeal No. 146/2011 of the State Commission Punjab)With Ia/3259/2013,Ia/3665/2013 of NCDRC Cases, July 23, 2014 (case 1. Baldev Singh 2. Balraj Singh Vs 1. Improvement Trust and Ors 2. Deputy Commissioner 3. Improvement Trust)

  Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent Trust states that, as per his instructions, the Trust is still willing to abide by the terms of letter dated 12.7.2010, issued by the Executive Officer to the Petitioners. The said letter reads as follows: "The application, mentioned in the subject,...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 1548 Of 2011, (Against the Order dated 07/09/2007 in Appeal No. 1241/2007 of the State Commission Karnataka) of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, August 30, 2011 (case 1. Bescom and Ors. 2. The Execution Engineer (Ele) Bescom Vs 1. H. Manjappa and Ors. 2. Smt. Susheelamma 3. Sri H.M. Manjunath)

  The District Forum allowed the complaint partly and had directed the opposite parties including the petitioners to jointly pay compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- to the complainants. The said compensation was apportioned between the opposite parties. The petitioners were directed to pay Rs. 1,00,000/-...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 574 Of 2012, (Against the Order dated 04/11/2011 in Appeal No. 3302/2009 of the State Commission Karnataka) of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, November 03, 2015 (case 1. Blue Star Ltd 2. Dr B Vasudeva Somyaji Vs Dr. B. Vasudeva Somayaji and Anr.)

  Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties have arrived at an amicable settlement. He has tendered an application under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC with a request for disposal of the revision petition in terms of the settlement. Learned counsel for respondent No.1/complainant states that...

• Case nº First Appeal No. 674 of 2007 of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, September 17, 2013 (case 1. C.K. Pandian, 2. P. Vinayakaselvi, 3. C.K.P. Parmasundari, 4. C.K.P. Aiyan Ram, 5. C.K.P. Srinivasalingam Vs 1. S.R. Trust, 2. Meenakshi Mission Hospital and Research Centre, 3. Dr. Ramesh, 4. Dr. Pandian, 5. M/s New India Assurance Co. Ltd.)

  1. This appeal has been filed by C.K. Pandian, Appellant herein and Complainant No.1 before the Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) and others being aggrieved by the order of that Commission which had dismissed their complaint of ...