National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Jurisdiction/Issuing Court

Latest documents

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 1336 Of 2017, (Against the Order dated 09/03/2017 in Appeal No. 818/2016 of the State Commission Punjab) of NCDRC Cases, June 08, 2017 (case Baljit Kaur Vs Ms. Divine Motors & Anr.)

  This Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner/complainant -- Baljeet Kaur against the order of the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (for Short, ''State Commission) dated 9.3.2017 in FA No.818 of 2016 vide which the appeal had been decided in favour of the appellant/opposite party no.1 -- M/s Divine Motors.

• Case nº First Appeal No. 491 Of 2016, (Against the Order dated 22/04/2016 in Complaint No. 15/2015 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh) of NCDRC Cases, June 02, 2017 (case Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sai Ram Education Trust)

  This First Appeal has been preferred by the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and its Branch Manager, the Opposite Parties in the Complaint, against the order dated 10.03.2016, passed by the Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Shimla (for short "the State Commission") in Complaint Case No. 15 of 2015. By the impugned orde...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 83 Of 2017, (Against the Order dated 03/10/2016 in Appeal No. 712/2016 of the State Commission Maharastra) of NCDRC Cases, May 31, 2017 (case Dr. Mahesh S. Bhatambre Vs Nikhil Mahesh Rodge)

  1. This revision petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 03.10.2016 passed in First Appeal No. 712 of 2016 by Maharasthra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Aurangabad, whereby the State Commission allowed the appeal of the complainant. 2. The brief facts

• Case nº Consumer Case No. 2 Of 2014 of NCDRC Cases, May 30, 2017 (case Mohit Chopra Vs Ms. Unitech Limited & Ors.)

  1. The complainant booked a residential apartment with the OP in a project namely ''Harmony'' which the said OP is developing in Sector-50, Nirvana Country, Gurgaon. Apartment No.1102, admeasuring 3309 sq. ft. in Tower-4 of the above referred project was allotted to him for a total consideration of Rs.1,66,18,875/- and the parties entered into a Bu...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 659 Of 2017, (Against the Order dated 05/08/2016 in Appeal No. 623/2013 of the State Commission Kerala) of NCDRC Cases, May 25, 2017 (case Ms. Cheruvallil Investments and Ors. Vs District Collector, & Anr.)

  1. These two revision petitions have been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the impugned order dated 05.08.2016, passed by the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram (hereinafter referred to as "the State Commission") in Appeals No. 623/2013 and 624/2013, filed by the present pe...

• Case nº First Appeal No. 55 Of 2015, (Against the Order dated 04/12/2014 in Complaint No. 79/2013 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh) of NCDRC Cases, May 25, 2017 (case PNB Metlife Insurance Compamy Ltd. & Anr. Vs Mopidevi Lalitha)

  1. This first appeal has been filed under section 19 read with Section 21(a)(ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the impugned order dated 04.12.2014, passed by the Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as "the State Commission") in Consumer Complaint No. 79/2013, filed by the p...

• Case nº First Appeal No. 1408 Of 2016, (Against the Order dated 12/04/2016 in Complaint No. 153/2014 of the State Commission Punjab) of NCDRC Cases, May 25, 2017 (case Inderpal Singh Sidhu Vs Managing Director, Ms. Eldeco Jalandhar Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.)

  1. This first appeal has been filed under section 19 read with section 21(a)(ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 challenging the impugned order dated 12.04.2016, passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ''the State Commission'') in consumer complaint No. 153/2014 filed by the present appella...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 2409 Of 2014, (Against the Order dated 26/02/2014 in Appeal No. 311/2012 of the State Commission Gujarat) of NCDRC Cases, May 25, 2017 (case Ms. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Irfan Nurmohammad Memon)

  1. This revision petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 26.02.2014, passed by the Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ''the State Commission'') in First Appeal No. 311/2012, "Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. versus Irfan Nurmoham...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 3308 Of 2016, (Against the Order dated 24/08/2016 in Appeal No. 590/2015 of the State Commission Maharastra) of NCDRC Cases, May 24, 2017 (case Anil Ramchandra Babhale Vs Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.)

  1. As per the complaint, the petitioner had started Stone Mine and set up a big plant of Gitti Khadan and Thresher machine. The said Thresher Machine Plant was in the name of M/s Om Crushing Company of which the petitioner was the proprietor. On 31.03.2007, they took an electric connection from the respondent/ opposite party for the said plant. He

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 2329 Of 2015, (Against the Order dated 23/06/2015 in Appeal No. 490/2014 of the State Commission Maharastra) of NCDRC Cases, May 24, 2017 (case Arun Inks Pvt. Ltd Vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd.)

  1. The present revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 23.06.2015 of the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (''the State Commission) in First Appeal no. 490 of 2014. 2. The facts of the case as per the petitioner/ complainant are that the petitioner was a private limited company, which had obtained...

Featured documents

• Case nº First Appeal No. 473 of 2012 of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, August 01, 2013 (case 1. A.S.Chakravarthy, 2. A. Sandhya Chakravarthy Vs M/s. Asvasidh Homes Builder & Developer)

  1. The complaint of the present appellants against respondent/M/s. Asvasidh Homes and its managing partners was dismissed by the AP State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in CCSR/1733/2012. The State Commission came to a conclusion that the complaint was not maintainable before it and...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 831 Of 2011, (Against the Order dated 02/07/2010 in Appeal No. 414/2009 of the State Commission Gujarat) of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, March 28, 2011 (case 1. Akash Agro Chemicals and Ors. 2. Satyam Agro Seeds 3. Stat Agro Tech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pratapbhai Narabhai Vala)

  Challenge in these proceedings is to the order dated 02.07.2010 passed by the Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ahmedabad ( in short, ''the State Commission'') in C.M. Application No. 414 of 2009. By the impugned order, C.M. Application No. 414 of 2009 for condonation of delay...

• Case nº First Appeal No. 320 of 2013 of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, May 21, 2015 (case 1. Amit Sarkar & Anr. S/O. Sh. A.K. Sarkar, 2. Mrs. Konika Sarkar W/O. Sh. Amit Sarkar Vs 1. Pgimer & 3 Ors. (Pgi), Through Its Medical Superintendent/Direector, 2. Advanced Trauma Centre Of Post Graduate Institute Of Medical Education & Research (Pgi) Through Its Centre Incharge, 3. Dr. Jujhar, Junior Resident, Orthopaedics, Atc, 4. Dr. Murali G. Senior Resident, Department Of Forensic Medicine, Post-Graduate Institute Of Medical Education & Research (Pgi))

  1. Above appeals are being disposed of by this common order, as these appeals arise from common impugned order dated 1.4.2013, passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, U.T. Chandigarh (for short, ''State Commission'') in C.C. No.43 of 2012. 2. Brief facts are, that only daughter of...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 3617 Of 2011, (Against the Order dated 29/07/2011 in Appeal No. 6/2011 of the State Commission Kerala) of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, September 06, 2012 (case 1. Anil V. Anand and Anr. 2. V.Vijayanand Vs Institute Of Human Resource Development)

  Based on his rank in Kerala Engineering Entrance Examination and counseling by the respondent/opp.party, petitioner No.1/complainant No.1 was offered admission under management quota in Electronics & Communication branch in Model Engineering College, Ernakulam. Petitioner paid a sum of Rs.38,700...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 1423 of 2006 With Revision Petition No. 3972 of 2006 of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, August 13, 2009 (case 1. Asha Garg and Others, 2. Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs 1. Life Insurance Corporation of India, 2. Asha Garg and Others)

  Salient features of the case are that deceased Yogendra Garg, husband of petitioner No. 1 and father of petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 obtained an insurance policy payable with double benefit, in case of accident, from respondent/ insurance company. The policy commenced from 28.8.1989. Undisputedly half...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 543 of 2007 of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, August 02, 2011 (case 1. Assistant Engineer, Water Works Department, Jodhpur, 2. State of Rajasthan Vs Ramesh Kichi Ghara Bans Khatik Bans)

  Respondent herein is the original complainant who filed a complaint before the District Forum, Jodhpur on 21.9.2005 stating inter alia that he took water connection from the Petitioner-1 Department in the year 2000 and since then he is paying the water charges regularly. It is the case of the...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 2888 Of 2011, (Against the Order dated 29/06/2011 in Appeal No. 165/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka) of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, April 03, 2012 (case 1. Balakrishna Naidu and Anr 2. Sharavathi Shelters Vs Roopa)

  Complainant/respondent entered into a construction agreement with the petitioner on 8.7.2005. Under the said agreement, respondent was to pay Rs.37,30,000/- to the petitioner for construction of flat, out of which Rs.30,23,150/- were paid by her. Respondent was paying the instalments regularly....

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 789/ 904 Of 2008, (Against the Order dated 16/11/2007 in Appeal No. 715/2007 of the State Commission Chandigarh) of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, August 30, 2012 (case 1. Berkeley Automobiles 2. Amar Singh And Another 3. Ashok Leyland Vs 1. Amar Singh And Another 2. Ashok Leyland 3. Berkeley Automobiles)

  1. Aggrieved by the order dated 16.11.2007 passed by the UT Chandigarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in appeal No. 715 / 2007, M/s. Berkeley Automobiles has filed petition, i.e., RP No. 789 / 2008 and aggrieved by another order dated 14.11.2007 passed by the same Commission in appeal ...

• Case nº Revision Petition No. 2610 of 2015 of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, December 03, 2015 (case 1. Blenzor (India), 2. Blenzor(India) India Through Its Partner Santosh Sawant India Now, Maharashtra Vs 1. M/S. Niklesh Cooking Oil Refineries & Anr. Through Its Partner Kamal Shorewala, S/O Sh. Prem Chand Shorewala, 2. Canara Bank, Through Its Branch Manager, Kaithal Haryana)

  This revision petition is directed against the order of the State Commission dated 26.08.2015 whereby the State Commission declined to condone the delay in filing the appeal of the petitioner against the order of the District Forum. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that they came to...

• Case nº Original Petition No. 179 of 1994 and Original Petition No. 2 of 1996 of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, November 09, 2012 (case 1. C. Venuprasad General Manager (Operations) Premier Vinyl Flooring Ltd. C-2, Commercial Centre Safdarjung Development Area New Delhi-110016 and Ors., 2. M/s Narangs International Hotel Pvt. Ltd. Regd. Office at Ambassador Hotel Churchgate, Mumbai - 400020 Vs 1. M/s Narangs International Hotel Pvt. Ltd. Regd. Office : The Ambassador, Churchgate Mumbai-400020, 2. OTIS Elevator Co. (India) Ltd. Head Office at Rehem Mansion 1, 42, SBS Road Mumbai-400039)

  1. Failure of proper upkeep and maintenance of the lifts in the Ambassador Hotel, Mumbai, owned and managed by M/s Narangs International Hotel Pvt. Ltd. is at the center of controversy in these two complaints. In OP No. 179 of 1994, complainants no. 1 to 10 were guests of the hotel. Their twofold...