High Courts - Case Law

vLex India contents

Case Law

Tweet

High Courts

Court

Latest documents

CM(M)--1455/2017. Case: SURINDER KUMAR Vs. ARVIND NATH PATHAK & ORS.. Delhi High Court
1. The petitioner, a sub-tenant, having unsuccessfully pursued his appeal bearing No.RCT-1126/2016 before the Learned Rent Control Tribunal, South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi („Tribunal‟) by judgment dated 21.09.2017 against order of eviction dated 02.06.2008 passed by the court of learned Additional Rent Controller, Tis Hazari Courts, D...
W.P.(C)--4237/2018. Case: INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD Vs. VAIBHAV JHAWAR AND ORS.. Delhi High Court
1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated March 14, 2018 of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (for short „Appellate Tribunal‟) in Misc. Appeal No. 72/2018 whereby the learned Appellate Tribunal has rejected the objection of the petitioner herein insisting on the pre-deposit of half of the amount, which had been claimed by th...
RSA--198/2018. Case: VIKRAM KUMAR Vs. PARVESH GUPTA. Delhi High Court
1. The appellant vide this regular second appeal i.e. RSA 198/2018 under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 assails the impugned judgment dated 05.11.2018 of the Ld. ADJ-06, Central, THC, New Delhi in RCA 62003/2016 which upheld the judgment dated 18.10.2016 of the learned trial Court of the CCJ-cumARC (Central District), THC, New Del...
W.P.(C)--9303/2018. Case: YOGITA CHAUHAN Vs. OFFICE DEPUTY DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION NCT OF DELHI. Delhi High Court
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction directing the respondent for quashing and setting aside the order dated 24.04.2018. Consequently, directing the respondent to issue joining letter to petitioner forthwith. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent advertised public notice dated 26.05.2017 for “Drawing a Pan...
W.P.(C)--9364/2015. Case: SAKSHI MISHRA MINOR Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA. Delhi High Court
1. The petitioner is a minor and has filed the present petition through her mother. The petitioner is, essentially, aggrieved by the action of respondent (hereafter „LIC‟) in not waiving the premium payable on account of the death of the proposer, the petitioner‟s late father. The petitioner also seeks refund of a sum of ₹31,148/- collected by LIC
W.P.(C)--4673/2002. Case: F.S.CHAUHAN Vs. UOI & ORS.. Delhi High Court
(b) quash the order of suspension dated 14/12/96, Memorandum of Charge dated 17/12/96 and order appointing Enquiry Officer and Presenting Officer dated 6/9-1-97 passed by Shri G.P. Singh, then a Gen. Manager of respondent No.2. (c) quash the resolution dated 2nd July 1997 of the Board of Directors of respondent No.2 including the malaf...
LPA--670/2017. Case: MANJEET SINGH Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Delhi High Court
1. The present appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is against the impugned judgment dated 14th February, 2017 whereby learned Single Judge has dismissed the Writ Petition No. 8970/2008. 2. In the impugned judgment, the learned Single Judge has confirmed order passed by Delhi School Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as thereby
BAIL APPLN.--2073/2018. Case: SHRI NARESH KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI. Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)--7768/2015. Case: CHATTER SINGH & ORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Delhi High Court
1. This is a petition filed by 26 Petitioners seeking the quashing notification dated 23rd January 1965 issued under Section 4 of the Acquisition Act, 1894 (LAA), a notification dated 6th September issued under Section 6 of the LAA and the Award dated 12th 1980 in respect of acquisition of land measuring 25 Bighas...
LPA--671/2016. Case: MUNNA LAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.. Delhi High Court
1.These appeals are directed against the common impugned judgment 5th August, 2015 of the learned Single Judge allowing the writ petitions the Indira Gandhi National Open University („IGNOU‟), which challenged an award dated 9th December, 2011 passed by the Government Industrial Tribunal-1 („the Tribunal‟) in the industrial r...