High Courts - Case Law

vLex India contents

Case Law

Tweet

High Courts

Court

Latest documents

W.P.(C)--3636/2016. Case: BRAHAM PRAKASH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. Delhi High Court
1. The present batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, have been filed by the petitioners who are presently working as Inspectors (GD) in the CRPF. All the petitions raise common issues with similar prayers and are, therefore, being decided by 2. The petitioner, Mr.Braham Prakash, joined the CRPF as a Cons...
W.P.(C)--8451/2017. Case: SHARAVAN YADAV & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. Delhi High Court
1. The present batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, have been filed by the petitioners who are presently working as Inspectors (GD) in the CRPF. All the petitions raise common issues with similar prayers and are, therefore, being decided by 2. The petitioner, Mr.Braham Prakash, joined the CRPF as a Cons...
W.P.(C)--2813/2018. Case: ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.. Delhi High Court
1. The present batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, have been filed by the petitioners who are presently working as Inspectors (GD) in the CRPF. All the petitions raise common issues with similar prayers and are, therefore, being decided by 2. The petitioner, Mr.Braham Prakash, joined the CRPF as a Cons...
W.P.(C)--3632/2016. Case: RAJESH KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. Delhi High Court
1. The present batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, have been filed by the petitioners who are presently working as Inspectors (GD) in the CRPF. All the petitions raise common issues with similar prayers and are, therefore, being decided by 2. The petitioner, Mr.Braham Prakash, joined the CRPF as a Cons...
W.P.(C)--3635/2016. Case: MANOJ KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. Delhi High Court
1. The present batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, have been filed by the petitioners who are presently working as Inspectors (GD) in the CRPF. All the petitions raise common issues with similar prayers and are, therefore, being decided by 2. The petitioner, Mr.Braham Prakash, joined the CRPF as a Cons...
W.P.(C)--3654/2016. Case: JAGJIT SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. Delhi High Court
1. The present batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, have been filed by the petitioners who are presently working as Inspectors (GD) in the CRPF. All the petitions raise common issues with similar prayers and are, therefore, being decided by 2. The petitioner, Mr.Braham Prakash, joined the CRPF as a Cons...
W.P.(C)--8818/2016. Case: RAKESH KUMAR CRPF Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. Delhi High Court
1. The present batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, have been filed by the petitioners who are presently working as Inspectors (GD) in the CRPF. All the petitions raise common issues with similar prayers and are, therefore, being decided by 2. The petitioner, Mr.Braham Prakash, joined the CRPF as a Cons...
LPA--248/2018. Case: GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY Vs. ABHINAV PANDEY & ORS.. Delhi High Court
23.01.2018, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.2028/2016, allowing the captioned writ petition filed respondent no.1 and directing the appellant/Guru Gobind Indraprastha University (hereinafter referred to as the “University”) award a Gold Medal to the respondent no.1 for his remarkable academic performance in the five year B.A.LL.B.
W.P.(C)--879/2018. Case: ABHILASH KUMAR AND ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. Delhi High Court
2. The brief facts as culled out from the record are that pursuant an advertisement issued in January, 2015 by the respondents, petitioners had applied for the post of Constable (GD) in the Upon qualifying the Physical Standard Test, the petitioners appeared in the Written Examination in which they were successful. After undergoing the Medical Ex...
O.M.P.--639/2008. Case: GOVT OF N.C.T OF DELHI Vs. M/S YASIKAN ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. Delhi High Court
1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 21 days in filing the restoration application being I.A. No.8293/2018. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is condoned. I.A. is disposed of. I.A. No. 8293/2018 (restoration of OMP 639/2008) 2. This is an application seeking recall of order dated 2nd 2016, wh...