Debt Recovery Tribunals

Court

Latest documents

• SARFAESI Application No. 2 of 2008. Case: Kross Manufactures India (Pvt.) Ltd. and Ors. Vs M/s. Allahabad Bank and Ors.. Chennai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The above application (SA) was filed by applicants on 21.01.2008 praying this Tribunal to direct the 3rd respondent M/s. Allahabad Bank, T. Nagar Branch represented by the Authorised Officer to release the goods valued at Rs. 20,24,000/- forthwith. The case of the applicants, in brief, is as follows:-- 1. The first applicant-M/s. Kross Manufact...

• S.A. No. 35/2008. Case: Chaitanya Pharma and Others Vs Union Bank of India. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The Respondent's taking possession u/s. 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 [for short 'SARFAESI Act'] of property bearing Plot No. E-51, Additional Ambernath Area, MIDC, Jambivali Village, Ambernath, District Thane is challenged in this application u/s. 17 of SARFAESI...

• O.A. No. 26/2007. Case: Bank of Maharashtra Vs Champagne Indage Ltd.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. This is an application for recovery of Rs. 24,45,26,215/- with interest @ PLR + 4% p.a. at quarterly rests from the date of filing the Original Application till full realization. The uncommon facts of the case are thus: The Champagne India Ltd. [CIL] was the Applicant's constituent enjoying certain Credit Facilities prior to 1996. Its account ha...

• SARFAESI Application No. 23/2007. Case: Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. Vs Authorised Officer, State Bank of India and Ors.. Chennai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. This application is filed by the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. the applicant herein to set aside the Tender Notice dt. 20.1.2007 published by the 1st respondent bank in respect of the subject property and to declare that the 1st respondent did not have the legal right or authority in law to take any steps against the subject property under the provisio...

• Application No. 72 of 2007. Case: Swastik Metal Corporation Vs Dena Bank and Others. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. This is an application u/s. 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 [for short 'SARFAESI Act']. The two flats in Mumbai described in Exh. A to the Securitisation Application [S.A.], subject matter of this Application, are sold by the Respondent Bank under SARFAESI Act by publ...

• Appeal No. 14 of 2008. Case: Balkrishna Sandeepkumar Vs Union Bank of India. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The order Dt. 24.01.2008 passed by Recovery Officer [R.O.] [Shri Udai Pal Singh] of this Tribunal dismissing the Appellant's-Intervener's application in Recovery Proceeding [R.P.] No. 40 of 2006 for protecting occupancy rights in the following properties under challenge in this Appeal; i. Godown No. 201, Building No. C, Antop Hill Warehousing

• Application No. 21 of 2008. Case: Uttam Galva Steels Ltd. Vs Bank of India and Ors.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The Intervener seeks to recall the declaration made by this tribunal in judgement Dt. 27.09.2004 while allowing Original Application [O.A.] No. 235 of 01 [High Court suit No. 2169 of 1992] and the Recovery Certificate [R.C.] issued pursuant thereto that the outstandings are secured by valid Equitable Mortgage of land bearing Survey No. 48 Hissa

• Application No. 16 of 2007. Case: Moushir Jamal Masalawala Vs Standard Chartered Bank Ltd. and Ors.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. This is Securitisation application (for short S.A.) for quashing and setting aside orders passed by the Ld. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (for short the Ld. CMM) on 11.05.2006 and 04.08.2008 in Miscellaneous application No. 165/Misc/2006 and Notice No. 64/N/2006, respectively. The application is also for quashing and setting aside the auction of...

• Application No. 28 of 2007. Case: Mr. Kamlesh R. Shah Vs Bank of Maharashtra and Ors.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The office premises being Unit No. 201, Level 2, Bhupati Chambers, 13, Mathew Road, Opera House, Mumbai 400 004 admeasuring about 5180.18 sq. ft. are subject matter of this Securitisation Application [S.A.]/say. The Applicant filed the Application for declaration that notice Dt. 24.11.2006 u/s. 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of F...

• Appeal No. 34 of 2008. Case: Vitro Pharma Products Ltd. Vs Asset Reconstruction Company India Ltd. [ARCIL]. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The Certificate Debtor in Recovery Proceeding [R.P.] No. 224 of 2003 has filed this Appeal for declaration that the public auction of Plot No. 89 A-B, Govt. Industrial Estate, Charkop, Kandivali West, Mumbai 400 067 is illegal. The Appellant has come out with case that Punjab National Bank [PNB] who was the original Certificate Holder, for recov...

Featured documents

• T.A. 87 of 2002. Case: Bank of India Vs Haribox Sawalaram and Ors.. Kolkatta Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. Mr. S.M. Basu, the learned Advocate appears for the applicant Bank, whereas neither of the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 as well as the learned Advocate appointed as the guardian ad-litem for the minor respondent Nos. 6 to 8 have appeared this day like the previous occasion, though each of them has...

• O.A. No. 277 of 2001. Case: Central Bank of India Vs Raindrop Equipments (India) Ltd. and Ors.. Nagpur Debt Recovery Tribunals

  3. In October 1988, the defendant No. 1 approached to applicant for credit facilities limit to the tune of Rs. 10 lakhs. The applicant sanctioned cash credit (hypothecation) limit of Rs. 5,90,000/- and L.C. to the tune of Rs. 4 lakhs. On or about 31.10.1988 the 1st defendant through its directors...

• Securitisation Application No. 13 of 2005. Case: Eupharma Laboratories Ltd. and Anr. Vs State Bank of India and Ors.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The applicant No. 1 company's following 2 properties are involved in this application under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short 'the SRFAESI Act'): (i) Land and Factory Buildings at Eupharma House,...

• SARFAESI Appeal No. 25 of 2004. Case: K. Inbarajan Vs Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited. Chennai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants seeking an order of this Tribunal to place appellants in possession with regard to two immovable properties mentioned in the possession notice dated 18.11.2004 and call for the statement of accounts relating to the transactions, rate of interest, etc. ...

• M.A. Nos. 15 and 16 of 2001 in T.A. No. 01 of 2002. Case: Nopani and Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs UCO Bank and Ors.. Kolkatta Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The parties, who have once entered into a compromise or a settlement, should not be permitted into receding or resiling from the said compromise in one pretext or another. Moreover, the attitude of any party departing from any compromise, which has already been recorded by a Court, should be...

• M.A. Nos. 154 and 155 of 2004 in R.P. No. 117 of 2002 in O.A. No. 396 of 2001. Case: Rajpal Solanki and Anr. Vs Central Bank of India and Ors.. Nagpur Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The Certificate Debtor Nos. 4 and 5 in R.P. No. 117/2002 issued pursuant to the judgment in O.A. No. 396/2001 of this Tribunal have filed this application for withdrawal of transfer of Recovery Certificate by letter dated 19.7.2004 by my learned predecessor to P.O. DRT III, New Delhi certifying...

• T.A. No. 157 of 2002. Case: State Bank of India Vs Dipak Thakur and Ors.. Kolkatta Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The only pertinent issue that stands for the determination by this Tribunal is that whereas the defendants have been found expressly not disputing the claim amount nor the entitlement of the applicant Bank for such an amount, in their written statement which is popularly called the cross or...

• Appeal No. 114 of 2004. Case: Swift Finlease (India) Ltd. Vs Bank of India and Ors.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. This application under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short 'the SRFAESI Act') pertains to commercial premises being Office No. 101 to 106, First Floor Nilkanth Commercial Centre, Sahar Road, Andheri (Eas...

• S.A. No. 24 of 2005. Case: Union of India (UOI) and Anr. Vs Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. and Ors.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. This appeal(application) under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short "the SRFAESI Act") pertains to Hat No. 19, 4th Floor, Fulgado Apartments, N.C. Kelkar Road, Opp. Sena Bhavan, Dadar(W),...

• O.A. No. 48 of 2002. Case: Bank of India Vs Kailash Steel 'O' Fab., Proprietary Firm and Anr.. Nagpur Debt Recovery Tribunals

  3. The short case of the applicant is that on or about 26th August, 1996 Term loan of Rs. 7.5 lakhs, Soft loan of Rs. 2.49 lakhs and Cash Credit limit of Rs. 2.31 lakhs were sanctioned to the defendant against security of equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds of his property. The term was...