Debt Recovery Tribunals

Jurisdiction/Issuing Court

Latest documents

• SARFAESI Application No. 2 of 2008. Case: Kross Manufactures India (Pvt.) Ltd. and Ors. Vs M/s. Allahabad Bank and Ors.. Chennai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The above application (SA) was filed by applicants on 21.01.2008 praying this Tribunal to direct the 3rd respondent M/s. Allahabad Bank, T. Nagar Branch represented by the Authorised Officer to release the goods valued at Rs. 20,24,000/- forthwith. The case of the applicants, in brief, is as follows:-- 1. The first applicant-M/s. Kross Manufact...

• S.A. No. 35/2008. Case: Chaitanya Pharma and Others Vs Union Bank of India. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The Respondent's taking possession u/s. 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 [for short 'SARFAESI Act'] of property bearing Plot No. E-51, Additional Ambernath Area, MIDC, Jambivali Village, Ambernath, District Thane is challenged in this application u/s. 17 of SARFAESI...

• O.A. No. 26/2007. Case: Bank of Maharashtra Vs Champagne Indage Ltd.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. This is an application for recovery of Rs. 24,45,26,215/- with interest @ PLR + 4% p.a. at quarterly rests from the date of filing the Original Application till full realization. The uncommon facts of the case are thus: The Champagne India Ltd. [CIL] was the Applicant's constituent enjoying certain Credit Facilities prior to 1996. Its account ha...

• SARFAESI Application No. 23/2007. Case: Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. Vs Authorised Officer, State Bank of India and Ors.. Chennai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. This application is filed by the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. the applicant herein to set aside the Tender Notice dt. 20.1.2007 published by the 1st respondent bank in respect of the subject property and to declare that the 1st respondent did not have the legal right or authority in law to take any steps against the subject property under the provisio...

• Application No. 72 of 2007. Case: Swastik Metal Corporation Vs Dena Bank and Others. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. This is an application u/s. 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 [for short 'SARFAESI Act']. The two flats in Mumbai described in Exh. A to the Securitisation Application [S.A.], subject matter of this Application, are sold by the Respondent Bank under SARFAESI Act by publ...

• Appeal No. 14 of 2008. Case: Balkrishna Sandeepkumar Vs Union Bank of India. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The order Dt. 24.01.2008 passed by Recovery Officer [R.O.] [Shri Udai Pal Singh] of this Tribunal dismissing the Appellant's-Intervener's application in Recovery Proceeding [R.P.] No. 40 of 2006 for protecting occupancy rights in the following properties under challenge in this Appeal; i. Godown No. 201, Building No. C, Antop Hill Warehousing

• Application No. 21 of 2008. Case: Uttam Galva Steels Ltd. Vs Bank of India and Ors.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The Intervener seeks to recall the declaration made by this tribunal in judgement Dt. 27.09.2004 while allowing Original Application [O.A.] No. 235 of 01 [High Court suit No. 2169 of 1992] and the Recovery Certificate [R.C.] issued pursuant thereto that the outstandings are secured by valid Equitable Mortgage of land bearing Survey No. 48 Hissa

• Application No. 16 of 2007. Case: Moushir Jamal Masalawala Vs Standard Chartered Bank Ltd. and Ors.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. This is Securitisation application (for short S.A.) for quashing and setting aside orders passed by the Ld. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (for short the Ld. CMM) on 11.05.2006 and 04.08.2008 in Miscellaneous application No. 165/Misc/2006 and Notice No. 64/N/2006, respectively. The application is also for quashing and setting aside the auction of...

• Application No. 28 of 2007. Case: Mr. Kamlesh R. Shah Vs Bank of Maharashtra and Ors.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The office premises being Unit No. 201, Level 2, Bhupati Chambers, 13, Mathew Road, Opera House, Mumbai 400 004 admeasuring about 5180.18 sq. ft. are subject matter of this Securitisation Application [S.A.]/say. The Applicant filed the Application for declaration that notice Dt. 24.11.2006 u/s. 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of F...

• Appeal No. 34 of 2008. Case: Vitro Pharma Products Ltd. Vs Asset Reconstruction Company India Ltd. [ARCIL]. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The Certificate Debtor in Recovery Proceeding [R.P.] No. 224 of 2003 has filed this Appeal for declaration that the public auction of Plot No. 89 A-B, Govt. Industrial Estate, Charkop, Kandivali West, Mumbai 400 067 is illegal. The Appellant has come out with case that Punjab National Bank [PNB] who was the original Certificate Holder, for recov...

Featured documents

• O.A. Case No. 17 of 2002. Case: Allahabad Bank Vs Bajarang Enterprises and Ors.. Ranchi Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The applicant Allahabad Bank, Doranda Branch, Ranchi had presented this Application under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as Act) in DRT, Patna on 8.12.1998 against the defendants for recovery of debts of Rs. 1,03,61,6...

• SARFAESI Application No. 23/2007. Case: Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. Vs Authorised Officer, State Bank of India and Ors.. Chennai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. This application is filed by the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. the applicant herein to set aside the Tender Notice dt. 20.1.2007 published by the 1st respondent bank in respect of the subject property and to declare that the 1st respondent did not have the legal right or authority in law to take any...

• O.A. No. 1721 of 1999. Case: Central Bank of India Vs The Official Liquidator, High Court and Ors.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  2. The borrower company (defendant No. 1) is in liquidation but for the sake of convenience I shall refer it as the borrower or defendant No. 1. The defendant Nos. 2 and 3 are guarantors. The defendant No. 4 is sued as illegal occupant of mortgaged property. 3. The defendant No. 1 is the applicant'...

• Securitisation Application No. 3 of 2006. Case: Heerlaxmi Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Bank of India and Ors.. Nagpur Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. Whether there is an arbitration agreement between the applicant and the opponent? If yes, whether in view of provisions of Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (for short SRFAESI Act), the dispute falls within the jurisdiction of...

• SARFAESI Application No. 2 of 2008. Case: Kross Manufactures India (Pvt.) Ltd. and Ors. Vs M/s. Allahabad Bank and Ors.. Chennai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The above application (SA) was filed by applicants on 21.01.2008 praying this Tribunal to direct the 3rd respondent M/s. Allahabad Bank, T. Nagar Branch represented by the Authorised Officer to release the goods valued at Rs. 20,24,000/- forthwith. The case of the applicants, in brief, is as...

• T.A. 162 of 2002. Case: Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs Shri Mintu Das and Ors.. Kolkatta Debt Recovery Tribunals

  3. The applicant Bank has preferred one application under Sub-section (1) of Section 19 for realisation of Rs. 12,60,191.18 p, against those respondents jointly and severally before the learned transferring Tribunal; the date of making of such an application is January 16, 2001. 4. Neither of...

• Review Application No. 7 of 2005. Case: Shardaprasad and Ors. Vs State Bank of India and Ors.. Nagpur Debt Recovery Tribunals

  2. At few facts necessary for understanding the controversy in the matter are that the Bank had filed Spl. Civil Suit 76/94 in the Court of Civil Judge, Sr. Divn., Pusad against the other respondents herein who were defendants in the suit. By judgment dated 1.11.1995, the learned Civil Judge...

• Recovery Proceeding No. 41 of 2001 and O.A. No. 209 of 1996. Case: State Bank of India Vs Mcleod and Co. Ltd. and Ors.. Nagpur Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The State Bank of India filed Original Application No. 209 of 1996 against the defendants for recovery of its debt. In pursuance of order dated 4th June, 2001 certificate for recovery was issued on 20th June, 2001 by the then learned Presiding Officer of this Tribunal for the recovery of...

• O.A. No. 128 of 2002. Case: UCO Bank Vs Gammon India Ltd.. Mumbai Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. This is an application for recovery of U.S. $ 4,64,920.94 with interest @ 1% p.a. over the London Inter-Bank rate on the loan of U.S. $3.5 lacs from the date of filing the Original Application till full realization. 2. It is necessary to know following facts for understanding the dispute...

• T.A. No. 8 of 2003. Case: United Bank of India Vs The Lespodrex and Ors.. Kolkatta Debt Recovery Tribunals

  1. The application preferred by the applicant Bank for the recovery of a huge amount of money of Rs. 2,12,98,698.66 with further interest against the four defendants should have been disposed of earlier; and the said claim application preferred by the said Bank, against the above defendant ought to ...