Competition Commision of India

Latest documents

• Case No. 50 of 2014. Case: Prem Prakash Vs The Principal Secretary, Madhya Pradesh Public Works Department and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in this case was filed by Shri Prem Prakash (the 'Informant') under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the 'Act') against the Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh ('OP-1') and the Director General, Central Public Works Department, New Delhi ('OP-2') alleging contravention of the p...

• Case No. 103 of 2016. Case: Aditya Automobile Spares Private Limited and Ors. Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the instant matter has been filed by Aditya Automobile Spares Private Limited and three others ('Informants') under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the 'Act') against Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. ('OP') alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act. 2. As stated, the Informants belong to Aditya G...

• Case No. 101 of 2016. Case: Sunil Kumar Jain Vs Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the instant matter has been filed by Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the "Act") against Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC (hereinafter, "OP-1"), AMP Motors Private Limited (hereinafter, "OP-2") and Future Generali India Insurance Company Limited (hereinaft...

• Case No. 102 of 2016. Case: Tirath Ram Vs Baba Associate. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed by Shri Tirath Ram (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the "Act") against Baba Associate (hereinafter, the "OP") alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act. 2. It is stated that the Informant is the owner of a property bearing No. 5A/110...

• Case No. 88 of 2016. Case: Sri Rama Agri Genetics (India) Private Limited Vs Mahyco Monsanto Biotech India Limited and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the present case has been filed by Sri Rama Agri Genetics (India) Private Limited (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('Act') against Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Limited (hereinafter, the "OP-1/MMBL"), Monsanto Holdings Private Limited (hereinafter, the "OP-2/MHPL"), Monsanto

• Case No. 20 of 2014. Case: Biswanath Prasad Singh Vs Director General of Health Services (DGHS), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. Subsequent to the order passed by the Hon'ble Competition Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter, the " Hon'ble COMPAT") vide its order dated 1st March, 2016 in Appeal No. 63/2014, the proceedings in the present matter were re-initiated by the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter, the "Commission"). 2. The information in the present matter was...

• Case No. 08 of 2016. Case: Justickets Pvt. Ltd. Vs Big Tree Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. M/s. Justickets Pvt. Ltd. ('Informant') has filed the present information under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('Act') against M/s. Big Tree Entertainment Private Limited ('OP-1') and M/s. Vista Entertainment Solutions Limited ('OP-2') alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 3 and 4 of the Act. 2. As per the informati...

• Case No. 24 of 2016. Case: South Gujarat Warp Knitters Association Vs Prafful Overseas Private Limited and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter, the 'Act') by South Gujarat Warp Knitters Association (hereinafter, the 'Informant') against Prafful Overseas Private Limited (hereinafter, 'OP-1') and Welspun Syntex Limited (hereinafter, 'OP-2') alleging, inter alia, contravention of the pr...

• Case No. 109 of 2015. Case: Rajeev Nohwar Vs Lodha Group. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the present case has been filed by Shri Rajeev Nohwar, a resident of C-1104, Park Titanium, Park Street, Wakad, Pune-411057, Maharashtra (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter, the "Act") against Lodha Group, represented through Sahajanand HiTech Constructions Private Li...

• Case No. C-175/09/DGIR/27/28-MRTP. Case: The Belgaum District Chemists and Druggists Association Vs Abbott India Ltd. and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present matter was transferred to the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referred to as the "Commission") by the erstwhile Director General of Investigation and Registration, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (hereinafter referred to as "DGIR") under Section 66(6) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referr...

Featured documents

• Case No. 103 of 2016. Case: Aditya Automobile Spares Private Limited and Ors. Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the instant matter has been filed by Aditya Automobile Spares Private Limited and three others ('Informants') under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the 'Act') against Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. ('OP') alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the...

• Case No. 43 of 2014. Case: Anila Gupta Vs BEST Undertaking. Competition Commision of India

  1. Ms. Anila Gupta vide her instant application, received in the Commission on 18.06.2014, is seeking re-opening of her previously instituted information viz. Case No. 06 of 2010 which was filed by her ('the informant') under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('the Act') against BEST...

• Case No. 33/2011. Case: Automobiles Dealers Association, Hathras, U.P. through Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Dubey & Mr. Rahul Trivedi Vs Global Automobiles Limited and Pooja Expo India Private Limited through Advocate Punit Jain. Competition Commision of India

  1. The Commission has received the present information from M/s. Automobile Dealers Association, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the "Informant") on 28.06.2011 under the provisions of Section 19 (1) (a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act")...

• Case No. 76 of 2014. Case: Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BEST) Vs Tata Power Company Limited. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the present matter has been filed by Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (hereinafter, the 'Informant'/'BEST') under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter, the 'Act') against M/s. Tata Power...

• Case No. 40 of 2014. Case: Deepak Kumar Jain Vs TDI Infrastructure Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. Shri Deepak Kumar Jain and Shri Manoj Kumar Jain (the "Informants") have filed the instant information under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the "Act") against M/s. TDI Infrastructure Ltd. and others alleging, inter alia, contravention of the provisions of...

• CIC/AD/C/2013/000560-DS. Case: Dr. Gian Singh Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi. Competition Commision of India

  Court Information Competition Commisi......

• Case No. 37/2011. Case: Film & Television Producers Guild of India Vs Multiplex Association of India (MAI), Mumbai and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the present case was filed on 22.07.2011 by Film & Television Producers Guild of India, India (hereinafter, referred to as "FTPGI"), against Multiplex Association of India (hereinafter, referred to as "MAI"/"OP 1") and its members, consisting...

• Suo Moto Case No. 03 of 2014. Case: In Re: Cartelization in respect of tenders floated by Indian Railways for supply of Brushless DC Fans and other electrical items Vs. Competition Commision of India

  1. This case was taken up by the Commission suo moto, based on the information received from the Superintendent of Police, Anti-Corruption HQ, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), New Delhi vide letter dated 01.04.2014 wherein it was stated that the CBI, during an inquiry into certain alleged...

• Suo Moto Case No. 04 of 2013. Case: In Re: Sheth & Co. Vs. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present case relates to suo-moto cognizance taken by the Commission against allegations of suspected cartelization by thirteen manufacturers/suppliers of CN container? i.e., 'containers with disc required for 81 mm bomb? (hereinafter, the Product') to the three ordnance factories namely,...

• Case No. 58 of 2012. Case: Kannada Grahakara Koota and Ors. Vs Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC) and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present order will dispose of the case that initiated from the information filed by Kannada Grahakara Koota (hereinafter, the 'Informant 1') and Shri Ganesh Chetan (hereinafter, the 'Informant 2') (collectively referred to as the 'Informants') under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act,...