Competition Commision of India

Latest documents

• Case No. 50 of 2014. Case: Prem Prakash Vs The Principal Secretary, Madhya Pradesh Public Works Department and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in this case was filed by Shri Prem Prakash (the 'Informant') under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the 'Act') against the Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh ('OP-1') and the Director General, Central Public Works Department, New Delhi ('OP-2') alleging contravention of the p...

• Case No. 103 of 2016. Case: Aditya Automobile Spares Private Limited and Ors. Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the instant matter has been filed by Aditya Automobile Spares Private Limited and three others ('Informants') under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the 'Act') against Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. ('OP') alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act. 2. As stated, the Informants belong to Aditya G...

• Case No. 88 of 2016. Case: Sri Rama Agri Genetics (India) Private Limited Vs Mahyco Monsanto Biotech India Limited and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the present case has been filed by Sri Rama Agri Genetics (India) Private Limited (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('Act') against Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Limited (hereinafter, the "OP-1/MMBL"), Monsanto Holdings Private Limited (hereinafter, the "OP-2/MHPL"), Monsanto

• Case No. 20 of 2014. Case: Biswanath Prasad Singh Vs Director General of Health Services (DGHS), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. Subsequent to the order passed by the Hon'ble Competition Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter, the " Hon'ble COMPAT") vide its order dated 1st March, 2016 in Appeal No. 63/2014, the proceedings in the present matter were re-initiated by the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter, the "Commission"). 2. The information in the present matter was...

• Case No. 101 of 2016. Case: Sunil Kumar Jain Vs Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the instant matter has been filed by Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the "Act") against Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC (hereinafter, "OP-1"), AMP Motors Private Limited (hereinafter, "OP-2") and Future Generali India Insurance Company Limited (hereinaft...

• Case No. 102 of 2016. Case: Tirath Ram Vs Baba Associate. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed by Shri Tirath Ram (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the "Act") against Baba Associate (hereinafter, the "OP") alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act. 2. It is stated that the Informant is the owner of a property bearing No. 5A/110...

• Case No. 08 of 2016. Case: Justickets Pvt. Ltd. Vs Big Tree Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. M/s. Justickets Pvt. Ltd. ('Informant') has filed the present information under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('Act') against M/s. Big Tree Entertainment Private Limited ('OP-1') and M/s. Vista Entertainment Solutions Limited ('OP-2') alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 3 and 4 of the Act. 2. As per the informati...

• Case No. 24 of 2016. Case: South Gujarat Warp Knitters Association Vs Prafful Overseas Private Limited and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter, the 'Act') by South Gujarat Warp Knitters Association (hereinafter, the 'Informant') against Prafful Overseas Private Limited (hereinafter, 'OP-1') and Welspun Syntex Limited (hereinafter, 'OP-2') alleging, inter alia, contravention of the pr...

• Case No. 109 of 2015. Case: Rajeev Nohwar Vs Lodha Group. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the present case has been filed by Shri Rajeev Nohwar, a resident of C-1104, Park Titanium, Park Street, Wakad, Pune-411057, Maharashtra (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter, the "Act") against Lodha Group, represented through Sahajanand HiTech Constructions Private Li...

• Case No. C-175/09/DGIR/27/28-MRTP. Case: The Belgaum District Chemists and Druggists Association Vs Abbott India Ltd. and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present matter was transferred to the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referred to as the "Commission") by the erstwhile Director General of Investigation and Registration, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (hereinafter referred to as "DGIR") under Section 66(6) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referr...

Featured documents

• Case No. 54 of 2013. Case: A resident of Eldeco Elegance Vs Eldeco Housing and Industries Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The OP had been active in real estate development in north India and developing projects in Panipat, Sonepat, Ludhiana, Jhansi, Neemrana, Jalandhar, Noida and Lucknow. In September 2006, the OP launched the Eldeco Elegance residential complex project comprising residential flats, club and a...

• Case No. 12 of 2012. Case: All Odisha Steel Federation Vs Odisha Mining Corporation Limited. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed by All Odisha Steel Federation (hereinafter referred to as 'the Informant') against Odisha Mining Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the Opposite Party' or 'OMC') under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as '...

• Case No. 64 of 2015. Case: Arvind Sood Vs Hyundai Motor India Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the 'Act') by Shri Arvind Sood (hereinafter referred to as the 'Informant') against Hyundai Motor India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'OP') alleging, inter alia, contravention of the provisions of...

• Case No. 57/2010. Case: Best Xerox Centre, Properitor Smt. Sunder Jain, represented through authorized representative Sh. R.C. Jain Vs Xerox Modi India Limited. Competition Commision of India

  1 The present information has been filed under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002 by M/s. Best Xerox Centre through its sole proprietor Smt. Sunder Jain (hereinafter referred as informant) against Xerox Modi India Limited (hereinafter referred as OP) for alleged abuse of its dominant position...

• Case No. 2/2010 - File No. (1)/(2)/2010-Sectt.. Case: Cinergy Picture (P) Ltd. Vs ETC Network Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The instant information has been filed against the opposite party under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002. It is stated that the informant has produced a cinematograph film by the name 'Rann' and this movie was slated to be released in public on 29th January, 2010. According to the...

• Ref. Case No. 01 of 2012. Case: Director General (Supplies & Disposals) Vs M/s. Puja Enterprises Basti and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present reference has been filed by Director General (Supplies & Disposals), Directorate General of Supplies & Disposals (DG S&D), Department of Commerce, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India, New Delhi ('the informant') under section 19(1)(b) of the...

• Case No. 52 of 2012. Case: Exclusive Motors Pvt. Limited Vs Automobili Lamborghini S.P.A.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed by Exclusive Motors Pvt. Limited ('the informant') under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('the Act') against Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A. ('the opposite party') alleging inter-alia contravention of Section 3 and Section 4 of the Act. The...

• Suo Moto Case No. 02 of 2014. Case: Government of Kerala Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present matter was taken up suo moto pursuant to an anonymous information received by the Commission under section 19(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('Act') against M/s. National Insurance Co. Ltd. ('OP-1'), New India Assurance Co. Ltd. ('OP-2'), Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. ('OP-3') and...

• Case Nos. 21, 22 and 23 of 2014. Case: In Re: Himalaya Realestate Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Competition Commision of India

  Decision: 1. The present information(s) relate to same allegations against the OP filed by 3 different set of informants u/s. 19(1)(a) of the Act. Briefly, the case pertains to alleged abuse of dominant position under section 4 of the Act by OP with respect to its residential project in Greater Noi....

• Case No. 08/2009. Case: JAK Communications Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sun Direct TV Pvt. Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed by JAK Communications Pvt. Ltd., Chennai (hereinafter referred to as Informant) on 22.09.2009 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002 (herein after referred as the Act) against Sun Direct TV Pvt. Ltd., Chennai (hereinafter referred to as Opposite...