Competition Commision of India

Latest documents

• Case No. 50 of 2014. Case: Prem Prakash Vs The Principal Secretary, Madhya Pradesh Public Works Department and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in this case was filed by Shri Prem Prakash (the 'Informant') under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the 'Act') against the Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh ('OP-1') and the Director General, Central Public Works Department, New Delhi ('OP-2') alleging contravention of the p...

• Case No. 103 of 2016. Case: Aditya Automobile Spares Private Limited and Ors. Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the instant matter has been filed by Aditya Automobile Spares Private Limited and three others ('Informants') under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the 'Act') against Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. ('OP') alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act. 2. As stated, the Informants belong to Aditya G...

• Case No. 88 of 2016. Case: Sri Rama Agri Genetics (India) Private Limited Vs Mahyco Monsanto Biotech India Limited and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the present case has been filed by Sri Rama Agri Genetics (India) Private Limited (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('Act') against Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Limited (hereinafter, the "OP-1/MMBL"), Monsanto Holdings Private Limited (hereinafter, the "OP-2/MHPL"), Monsanto

• Case No. 20 of 2014. Case: Biswanath Prasad Singh Vs Director General of Health Services (DGHS), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. Subsequent to the order passed by the Hon'ble Competition Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter, the " Hon'ble COMPAT") vide its order dated 1st March, 2016 in Appeal No. 63/2014, the proceedings in the present matter were re-initiated by the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter, the "Commission"). 2. The information in the present matter was...

• Case No. 101 of 2016. Case: Sunil Kumar Jain Vs Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the instant matter has been filed by Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the "Act") against Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC (hereinafter, "OP-1"), AMP Motors Private Limited (hereinafter, "OP-2") and Future Generali India Insurance Company Limited (hereinaft...

• Case No. 102 of 2016. Case: Tirath Ram Vs Baba Associate. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed by Shri Tirath Ram (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the "Act") against Baba Associate (hereinafter, the "OP") alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act. 2. It is stated that the Informant is the owner of a property bearing No. 5A/110...

• Case No. 08 of 2016. Case: Justickets Pvt. Ltd. Vs Big Tree Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. M/s. Justickets Pvt. Ltd. ('Informant') has filed the present information under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('Act') against M/s. Big Tree Entertainment Private Limited ('OP-1') and M/s. Vista Entertainment Solutions Limited ('OP-2') alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 3 and 4 of the Act. 2. As per the informati...

• Case No. 24 of 2016. Case: South Gujarat Warp Knitters Association Vs Prafful Overseas Private Limited and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter, the 'Act') by South Gujarat Warp Knitters Association (hereinafter, the 'Informant') against Prafful Overseas Private Limited (hereinafter, 'OP-1') and Welspun Syntex Limited (hereinafter, 'OP-2') alleging, inter alia, contravention of the pr...

• Case No. 109 of 2015. Case: Rajeev Nohwar Vs Lodha Group. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the present case has been filed by Shri Rajeev Nohwar, a resident of C-1104, Park Titanium, Park Street, Wakad, Pune-411057, Maharashtra (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter, the "Act") against Lodha Group, represented through Sahajanand HiTech Constructions Private Li...

• Case No. C-175/09/DGIR/27/28-MRTP. Case: The Belgaum District Chemists and Druggists Association Vs Abbott India Ltd. and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present matter was transferred to the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referred to as the "Commission") by the erstwhile Director General of Investigation and Registration, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (hereinafter referred to as "DGIR") under Section 66(6) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referr...

Featured documents

• Case No. 33 of 2013. Case: : Rajiv Kumar Chauhan Vs M/s. BPTP Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. Informant booked a residential unit in a project called "Park Elite Floors, Parkland, Faridabad" being developed by OP in Faridabad. The initial cost of the said unit was declared to public at large Rs. 25.56 lacs + EDC & IDC (external and internal development charges). OP launched ...

• F. No. DGIR/2008/IP/11 and UTPE Case No. 30(146)/2008. Case: All India Distillers' Association Vs Haldyn Glass Gujarat Ltd. and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  2.1 This complaint was filed by the All India Distillers' Association against glass bottle manufacturers in India alleging restrictive and monopolistic trade practices being adopted by the four major manufacturers namely: Haldyn Glass Gujarat Ltd., Hindustan National Glass and Industries, AGI...

• Case Number 64/2010 & 12/2011. Case: Arshiya Rail Infrastructure Limited (ARIL) Vs Ministry of Railways (MoR) through the Chairman, Railway Board (KB) and Container Corporation of India Limited (CONCOR), [Alongwith Case Number 02/2011]. Competition Commision of India

  1. Three separate information (two by ARIL and one by KRIL) were filed on different dates by the Informants under section 19(i)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (Act) for alleged abuse of dominant position by the opposite parties functioning as a group entity. As the core issues of all these cases...

• Case No. 19 of 2010. Case: Belaire Owner's Association Vs DLF Limited Haryana Urban Development Authority Department of Town and Country Planning, State of Haryana. Competition Commision of India

  1.1 With more than 1.2 billion people, India is the second most populous country in the world after China. Since 1991, a series of economic measures have led India to a higher sustained level of growth which has stimulated development across all sectors including the real estate industry. Since the ...

• Case No. 34 of 2013. Case: Casa Paradiso Owner's Welfare Association Vs M/s. Sanathnagar Enterprises Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. Project styled Casa Paradiso (Hyderabad) was launched by Lodha Group through its Associate Company - Sanathnagar Enterprises Ltd. (OP) in October 2010 for which bookings were made (after paying the booking amount) on the basis of a brochure depicting the broad layout, floor plans of various...

• Case No. 46 of 2012. Case: Dinesh Trehan Vs M/s. DLF Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed by Shri Dinesh Trehan ('the informant') under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('the Act') against M/s. DLF Ltd. ('the opposite party'/DLF) alleging inter alia contravention of the provisions of section 4 of the Act. Shorn of details, facts,...

• Case No. 57 of 2016. Case: Eskay Video Pvt. Ltd. Vs Real Image Media Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the instant matter was filed by Eskay Video Pvt. Ltd. ('Informant') under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the 'Act') against Real Image Media Technologies Pvt. Ltd. ('OP 1'), Shree Venkatesh Films Pvt. Ltd. ('OP 2'), UFO Moviez India Ltd. ('OP 3'), and Arti...

• Case No. 01/2010. Case: GKB Hi Tech Lenses Private Limited Vs Transitions Optical India Private Limited. Competition Commision of India

  1.1 This case was initiated on the basis of information filed by M/s GKB Hi Tech Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter "GKB") against M/s Transitions Optical India Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter "Transitions") to the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter "Commission") under Section 19(...

• Ref. Case No. 01 of 2014. Case: In Re: Emaar MGF Land Ltd. Vs. Competition Commision of India

  Having gone through the terms and conditions contained in the application form and letter of allotment issued by the defendant, in my view, this is a fit case which calls for investigation by the Competition Commission to examine whether the said document and the conduct of the defendant fall foul...

• Case No. 10/2009. Case: Internet Service Providers Association of India (ISPAI) Vs Department of Telecommunications (DoT). Competition Commision of India

  1. This Information has been filed by the Informant on 13.10.2009 and was considered by the Commission in its meeting held on 27.10.2009. The Commission decided to request the opposite party for its views in the matter. The opposite party sent its views vide its letter dated 3.12.2009. Subsequently,...