Competition Commision of India

Latest documents

• Case No. 50 of 2014. Case: Prem Prakash Vs The Principal Secretary, Madhya Pradesh Public Works Department and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in this case was filed by Shri Prem Prakash (the 'Informant') under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the 'Act') against the Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh ('OP-1') and the Director General, Central Public Works Department, New Delhi ('OP-2') alleging contravention of the p...

• Case No. 103 of 2016. Case: Aditya Automobile Spares Private Limited and Ors. Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the instant matter has been filed by Aditya Automobile Spares Private Limited and three others ('Informants') under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the 'Act') against Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. ('OP') alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act. 2. As stated, the Informants belong to Aditya G...

• Case No. 88 of 2016. Case: Sri Rama Agri Genetics (India) Private Limited Vs Mahyco Monsanto Biotech India Limited and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the present case has been filed by Sri Rama Agri Genetics (India) Private Limited (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('Act') against Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Limited (hereinafter, the "OP-1/MMBL"), Monsanto Holdings Private Limited (hereinafter, the "OP-2/MHPL"), Monsanto

• Case No. 20 of 2014. Case: Biswanath Prasad Singh Vs Director General of Health Services (DGHS), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. Subsequent to the order passed by the Hon'ble Competition Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter, the " Hon'ble COMPAT") vide its order dated 1st March, 2016 in Appeal No. 63/2014, the proceedings in the present matter were re-initiated by the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter, the "Commission"). 2. The information in the present matter was...

• Case No. 101 of 2016. Case: Sunil Kumar Jain Vs Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the instant matter has been filed by Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the "Act") against Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC (hereinafter, "OP-1"), AMP Motors Private Limited (hereinafter, "OP-2") and Future Generali India Insurance Company Limited (hereinaft...

• Case No. 102 of 2016. Case: Tirath Ram Vs Baba Associate. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed by Shri Tirath Ram (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the "Act") against Baba Associate (hereinafter, the "OP") alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act. 2. It is stated that the Informant is the owner of a property bearing No. 5A/110...

• Case No. 08 of 2016. Case: Justickets Pvt. Ltd. Vs Big Tree Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. M/s. Justickets Pvt. Ltd. ('Informant') has filed the present information under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('Act') against M/s. Big Tree Entertainment Private Limited ('OP-1') and M/s. Vista Entertainment Solutions Limited ('OP-2') alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 3 and 4 of the Act. 2. As per the informati...

• Case No. 24 of 2016. Case: South Gujarat Warp Knitters Association Vs Prafful Overseas Private Limited and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter, the 'Act') by South Gujarat Warp Knitters Association (hereinafter, the 'Informant') against Prafful Overseas Private Limited (hereinafter, 'OP-1') and Welspun Syntex Limited (hereinafter, 'OP-2') alleging, inter alia, contravention of the pr...

• Case No. 109 of 2015. Case: Rajeev Nohwar Vs Lodha Group. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the present case has been filed by Shri Rajeev Nohwar, a resident of C-1104, Park Titanium, Park Street, Wakad, Pune-411057, Maharashtra (hereinafter, the "Informant") under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter, the "Act") against Lodha Group, represented through Sahajanand HiTech Constructions Private Li...

• Case No. C-175/09/DGIR/27/28-MRTP. Case: The Belgaum District Chemists and Druggists Association Vs Abbott India Ltd. and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present matter was transferred to the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referred to as the "Commission") by the erstwhile Director General of Investigation and Registration, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (hereinafter referred to as "DGIR") under Section 66(6) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referr...

Featured documents

• Case No. 41 of 2014. Case: A Public Interest Law Initiative of Centre for Civil Society Vs Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) Committee. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('the Act') by Justice-A Public Interest Law Initiative of Centre for Civil Society ('the Informant') against Common Law Admission Test Committee ('the Opposite Party'/CLAT Committee) alleging inter alia...

• Case No. 38/2012. Case: All India Genset Manufacturer Association Vs Chief Secretary, Government of Haryana Civil Sectt. Chandigarh, Haryana, Financial Commissioner & Principal Secretary, Industries Department Civil Sectt., Chandigarh, Haryana and Director Supplies and Disposals, Haryana SCO No. 1032-33, Sector-22-B, Chandigarh, Haryana. Competition Commision of India

  1. The informant in this case is an association of Genset manufacturer and Authorized dealers looking after grievances of its members concerning their trade. OP-3 is a department of Haryana Government and the nodal agency for the purpose of various types of stores required by various Govt....

• Case No. 19 of 2011. Case: Arun Kumar Tyagi Vs The Software Engineering Institute, The High Court of Uttrakhand and The HCL Technologies Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed before the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referred to as 'the Commission') by Arun Kumar Tyagi (hereinafter referred to as 'the informant') on 21.04.2011 under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act')...

• Case No. 04 of 2015. Case: Best IT World (India) Private Limited (iBall) Vs Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed by M/s. Best IT World (India) Private Limited (hereinafter, the 'Informant') under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter, the 'Act') against M/s. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) (hereinafter, the 'Opposite Party No. 1') and M/s. ...

• Combination Registration No. C-2012/03/47. Case: CCI Vs Zero Coupon Optionally Convertible Debentures. Competition Commision of India

  1. On 27th March, 2012, the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referred to as the "Commission") received a notice under sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") relating to the proposed subscription to the Zero...

• Case No. 46 of 2012. Case: Dinesh Trehan Vs M/s. DLF Ltd.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The present information has been filed by Shri Dinesh Trehan ('the informant') under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('the Act') against M/s. DLF Ltd. ('the opposite party'/DLF) alleging inter alia contravention of the provisions of section 4 of the Act. Shorn of details, facts,...

• Case No. 45 of 2015. Case: Ess Cee Securities Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs DLF Universal Limited and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The information in the present case has been filed by M/s. Ess Cee Securities Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Signature Securities Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter, the 'Informants') under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter, the 'Act') against M/s. DLF Universal Limited and M/s. DLF Home...

• MRTP Case-received from CAT. Case: Global Enterprise InfoTech Solutions (through its Proprietor) Vs I. SAP AG (German Parent Corporation) through its CEO and President Dietmar-Hopp-Allee and Ors.. Competition Commision of India

  1. The case has been transferred to this Commission by Competition Appellate Tribunal vide their order dated 27th January, 2010. The case was originally filed before the MRTP Commission and Director General (I and R) was directed to investigate the matter, however, no report was filed by DG (I and...

• Ref. Case No. 01 of 2014. Case: In Re: Emaar MGF Land Ltd. Vs. Competition Commision of India

  Having gone through the terms and conditions contained in the application form and letter of allotment issued by the defendant, in my view, this is a fit case which calls for investigation by the Competition Commission to examine whether the said document and the conduct of the defendant fall foul...

• Case No. 10/2012. Case: Iqbal Singh Gumber & Mrs. Hardeep Kaur Vs Purearth Infrastructure Ltd. & Others. Competition Commision of India

  1. I do not agree with the majority order for the reasons given below. The facts of the case are not required to be discussed again as they have already been discussed in the majority order. The main reason for closing the case is that M/s Purearth Infrastructure Ltd. was not held to be a dominant...