Central Information Commission

vLex India contents

Case Law

Tweet

Central Information Commission

Featured documents

File Nos. CIC/BS/A/2014/001473, 001475, 001476, 001477, 001478, 001480, 001481 and 001482/8077. Case: A. Raghunath Vs CPIO Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC). Central Information Commission
Court Information Central Information......
Appeal No. CIC/MP/A/2014/001625. Case: Abhishek Kumar Vs Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran (P) Ltd.. Central Information Commission
Court Information Central Information......
CIC/SA/C/2015/000092. Case: Anil Sood Vs DERC. Central Information Commission
Decision: M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar), Information Commissioner FACTS: 1. This Commission has issued the fol......
CIC/SA/A/2015/000136. Case: Arun Sharma Vs Tis Hazari Court. Central Information Commission
Court Information Central Information......
Appeal No. CIC/BS/A/2016/001679-BJ. Case: B R Madhumala Vs CPIO, Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-5(3)(1). Central Information Commission
Court Information Central Information......
Order Nos. 1792-93/98-WZB/C-II arising from in Appeal Nos. E/118/90-Bom and C/119/90-Bom. Case: Bavan Jiva Bharadia Vs Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad. Central Information Commission
1. These two appeals are against the order of the Additional Collector imposing penalty of Rs. 2,000/- imposed on Velji P Sons (Appeal C/119/90) and Rs. 1,000/- on Bhavan Jiva Bhardia (Appeal C/118/90). This appellant was a godown keeper of the first appellant. 2. Penalties have been imposed...
Appeal No. CIC/MA/A/2006/00121. Case: C. Ramesh Vs Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions. Central Information Commission
Decision: Wajahat Habibullah, C.I.C., Padma Balasubramaniam, M.M. Ansari and O.P. Kejariwal, I.Cs. 1. Shri. C. Ramesh (hereinafter referre......
Order No. A-732/CAL/98 arising from in Appeal No. E(SB) 592/92. Case: Chariot Cement Company Vs Commissioner of C. Ex., Bhubaneswar. Central Information Commission
1.1. The appellant firm, M/s. Chariot Cement Company during the period relevant for the purposes of this appeal was manufacturing HDPE Woven Sacks and was consuming the same captively without payment of any excise duty leviable thereon. As per the declaration filed by them to their jurisdictional...
Final Order Nos. 913-14/98-D arising from in Appeal Nos. E/729-30/93-D. Case: Collector of C. Ex., New Delhi Vs Rattan Suitings & Fabrics Pvt. Ltd.. Central Information Commission
1. In his order-in-original dated 29-1-1992 the Additional Collector held that following the ratio of the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Ujagar Prints the valuation for the purpose of charging duty where the goods were processed by a job worker, would be the value of the grey fabrics plus...
Order No. 2487/98-WZB/C-II arising from in Stay No. E/RA-12/98-Bom in Appeal No. E/578/93-Bom. Case: Collector of Central Excise, Pune Vs Bajaj Auto Ltd.. Central Information Commission
"Whether the amendment dated 15-4-1987 in Rule 57E can be given retrospective effect from 1-3-1986 in absence of a clear cut stipulation to that effect and contrary to the express provisions of Rule 57E as prevalent from 1-3-1986." 2. We have heard the Departmental Representative on the...