Armed Forces Tribunal

Court

Latest documents

• Transferred Application No. 1364 of 2010. Case: Mohan Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Being aggrieved with the impugned order of punishment dated 28.02.2002 of severe reprimand and denial of the rank of Sub Major and also salary of the said rank w.e.f. 01.08.2000 to 31.08.2002, petitioner preferred a writ petition, bearing No. 1301 of 2004 (SS) in the High Court of Uttaranchal, now Uttarakhand, Nainital, which has been transferre...

• O.A. No. 122 of 2011. Case: Sanjay Kumar Verma Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Present O.A. has been preferred under section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (In short the Act'), being aggrieved by the order of dismissal dated 19.03.2007, the impugned discharge certificate dated 27.05.2009 and the order rejecting the appeal of the Applicant dated 27.01.2011 2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the case a...

• OA 593/2016. Case: Arun Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  3. The facts that are necessary for disposing of this original application as stated by the learned counsel for the applicant are as follows:- The applicant was commissioned in the Corps of Engineers in the Army on 13.06.1981. He was promoted from time to time to higher ranks. On his promotion as Brigadier, he was posted as Chief Engineer, Project

• OA 302/2014. Case: Kamla Kanta Das Vs The Union of India and Ors. Armed Forces Tribunal

  (d) To direct disciplinary action against Col. Vishu Sikka and the members of the C OI in accordance with para 4 of Army HQ letter No. 32908/AG/DV-1(P) dated 16 October, 2000 for having connived with Gen Cruz. (e) To direct disciplinary action against Maj Gen SA Cruz, VSM for having misused his position, having forged documents, having tutored wit...

• T.A. No. 1000 of 2010. Case: Kalawati Devi Vs The Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Smt. Kalawati Devi, the petitioner preferred a writ petition, bearing number W.P. No. 954 (SS) of 2001 in the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital with a contention that her husband Keshav Ram is not traceable since 17.08.1989 and has been declared deserter by the respondents/Army (7-Sikh Light Infantry). The petitioner, accordingly prayed that...

• Transfer Application No. 96 of 2016. Case: D.V.S. Rana Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. O.A. preferred by the petitioner bearing No. 01(J)/2016 before the Armed forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Jabalpur has been transferred to this Bench by the Hon'ble Chairperson of the Armed Forces Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi for adjudication of the controversy raised in the petition. The petitioner has assailed the CRs covering the perio...

• Transferred Application No. 89 of 2016. Case: Mohd. Irfan Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Initially, the petitioner had filed Writ Petition No. 6135 (S/S) of 2013 before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, sitting at Lucknow Bench, Lucknow, which has been transferred to this Tribunal in pursuance to power contained in Section 34 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 by order dated 05.08.2016 for adjudication of controvers...

• M.A. No. 784 of 2016 and O.A. No. 317 of 2016. Case: R.P. Suthan Vs Union of India and Ors. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The Original Application has been filed by Vice Admiral R.P. Suthan, No. 01137H (Retd) seeking the benefit of broad banding of disability element of disability pension granted to him. The applicant has also sought that Regulation 37(b) of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 2008 be quashed as it denies the benefit of Regulation 94(c) of the Pe...

• O.A. No. 93 of 2016. Case: Jadhav Maruti Bhau Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The Original Application has been filed by Jadhav Maruti Bhau, Ex. Naib Subedar No. JC 404396 A, of Brigade of Guards, seeking disability element of disability pension with the benefit of rounding off. The applicant has also sought that Regulation 53(b) of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 2008, be quashed, as it does not provide benefit of

• O.A. No. 161 of 2015. Case: Krishna Hari C. Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  2. The applicant had earlier filed W.P. No. 16482 of 2003 in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, challenging his discharge from the Army, seeking reinstatement in service and promotion to the rank of Naib Subedar. The Writ Petition, on establishment of Armed Forces Tribunal, was transferred to the Regional Bench of this Tribunal at Lucknow a...

Featured documents

• O.A. Nos. 130 of 2010, 100 of 2011 and 109 of 2012. Case: 1. Nanda Kumar J, Aged 34 Years, No. 769270K Ex. CPL, IAF, S/o Late A. Jayaraman, 29/972, Arpana Road, Kadebhagam, Palluruthy P.O., Kochi, Ernakulam, Kerala, Pin -682006, 2. Rajumon T.M., Aged 41 Years, EX-SEP No. 13978552 - W, AMC, Aiswarya Bhavan, Veliyanadu P.O., Alleppey District, Kerala State, Pin -689590, 3. No. 116316 EX-Nah-1, P. Salim, Aged 35 Years Indian Navy, S/o P.N. Damodaran, Puthupparambil House, Mezhuveli P.O., Pathanamthitta Dist, Kerala State - 689507 Vs 1. The Union of India, Represented by The Secretary, Ministry of Defence (Air Force), South Block, New Delhi- 110001 and Ors., 2. The Union of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry of Defence (Army), South Block, New Delhi- 110001, The Chief of Army Staff, DHQ P.O., Integrated Hqrs, Ministry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi- 110001, The Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension), Draupadi Ghat, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh Pin -211014 and The Officer-in-Charge (Records) Records Army Medical Corps, Lucknow Cantt, Uttar Pradesh, .... Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. In these three matters, common questions of law and facts are involved, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order. In the instant Original Applications filed under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, the applicants have claimed disability pension. 2. The relevant ...

• T.A. No. 37 of 2010. Case: A. Shihabudeen Under The Rajput Regiment of The Indian Army Vs Principal Controller of Defence Accounts and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Petitioner, an Ex-Naik, is challenging Exts.P6, P11 and P12 and also seeks a direction to grant him War Injury Pension and other consequential reliefs to which he is entitled. This Transferred Application was filed as Writ Petition (Civil) No. 991 of 2006 before the Honourable High Court of...

• T.A. No. 39 of 2010. Case: Ambati Suryachandra Rao @ A.S. Rao S/o A.N. Rao Vs Government of India rep. by its Secretary and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The unfortunate petitioner, who had a long battle before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, had filed second round of litigation by way of filing W.P. No. 27201 of 1999 challenging the impugned order of the respondents in P.C. No. 77760/Q/VIII/ST12, dated 12.09.1997, as illegal and...

• M.A. No. 7 of 2011 in T.A. No. 84 of 2009. Case: Anu. V.R., Aged 22 Years, W/O. Late Ratheesh Kumar G.S., Residing at 'Makom', Muttackad P.O., Venganoor, Thiruvananthapuram Vs The Union of India, Represented by The Secretary to Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, New Delhi - 110001 and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  25. Powers of the Tribunal with regard to certain orders and directions.-Nothing in these rules shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect the inherent powers of the Tribunal to make such orders or give such directions as may be necessary or expedient to give effect to its orders or to prevent...

• O.A. (Appeal) No. 121 of 2014. Case: B. Shanmugan Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The applicant has filed this application for the relief of calling for records from the 3rd respondent pursuant to an order dated 24.02.2014 which was transmitted to the applicant by the 4th respondent vide letter dated 11.03.2014; to quash both the impugned proceedings as contrary to law,...

• Original Application No. 231 of 2014. Case: Basant Kumar Singh Vs The Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Present Original Application under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 has been preferred by the applicant being aggrieved with the impugned order of discharge passed in pursuance of power conferred by Army Rule 13(3)(iii), (v), as contained in Annexure No. A-1 to the O.A. on...

• T.A No. 287 of 2010 (Arising out of CWP 12406 of 2009). Case: Bikkar Singh Vs Union of India (UOI) and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  2. By this petition, which was filed in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, as writ petition on 17.8.2009, Petitioner has prayed for setting aside notionally the pre-mature discharge/release/dismissal of the Petitioner, and to grant pension and pensionary benefits, and also prayed for condonation ...

• O.A No. 161 of 2010. Case: Brig. (Retd.) R.R. Sinha S/o Shri S.D. Sinha Vs Union of India (UOI) through The Secretary Ministry of Defence, Chief of the Army Staff through Additional Director General Integrated of Ministry of Defence (Army) and General Officer Commanding in Chief, Western Command. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The challenge in this petition centres round the order dated 9.2.2010 passed by the Chief of Army Staff wherein he has not confirmed the decision given by the General Court Martial (GCM) on 12.9.2009 wherein they held the trial of the petitioner to be barred by limitation. 2. Counsel for the...

• T.A. No. 87 of 2009 and W.P. No. 19660 of 2003. Case: C. Kondaiah, (Ex-Serviceman) S/o. Late Kondaiah Vs The Union of India (UOI), Secretary to the Defence, Ministry of Defence and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The petitioner originally got an order of disability pension later lost the same due to the opinion of the Re-assessment Medical Board dated 28.04.2003. In furtherance of the impugned order from the Artillery Records, Nasik Road Camp, Maharashtra, dated 23.08.1996, the petitioner has moved the...

• T.A. No. 174 of 2010 Writ Petition Civil No. 7366 of 2003 and T.A. No. 137 of 2010 Writ Petition (Civil) No. 21907 of 2005. Case: Capt. Kulwant Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. T.A. 174 of 2010 has been filed by the Petitioner wherein he seeks quashing of the findings and sentence of the GCM of 31st August 2001, whereby the Petitioner was sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment and cashiering. The Petitioner also seeks to be reinstated in service with all...