Armed Forces Tribunal

Jurisdiction/Issuing Court

Latest documents

• Transferred Application No. 1364 of 2010. Case: Mohan Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Being aggrieved with the impugned order of punishment dated 28.02.2002 of severe reprimand and denial of the rank of Sub Major and also salary of the said rank w.e.f. 01.08.2000 to 31.08.2002, petitioner preferred a writ petition, bearing No. 1301 of 2004 (SS) in the High Court of Uttaranchal, now Uttarakhand, Nainital, which has been transferre...

• O.A. No. 122 of 2011. Case: Sanjay Kumar Verma Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Present O.A. has been preferred under section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (In short the Act'), being aggrieved by the order of dismissal dated 19.03.2007, the impugned discharge certificate dated 27.05.2009 and the order rejecting the appeal of the Applicant dated 27.01.2011 2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the case a...

• OA 593/2016. Case: Arun Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  3. The facts that are necessary for disposing of this original application as stated by the learned counsel for the applicant are as follows:- The applicant was commissioned in the Corps of Engineers in the Army on 13.06.1981. He was promoted from time to time to higher ranks. On his promotion as Brigadier, he was posted as Chief Engineer, Project

• OA 302/2014. Case: Kamla Kanta Das Vs The Union of India and Ors. Armed Forces Tribunal

  (d) To direct disciplinary action against Col. Vishu Sikka and the members of the C OI in accordance with para 4 of Army HQ letter No. 32908/AG/DV-1(P) dated 16 October, 2000 for having connived with Gen Cruz. (e) To direct disciplinary action against Maj Gen SA Cruz, VSM for having misused his position, having forged documents, having tutored wit...

• T.A. No. 1000 of 2010. Case: Kalawati Devi Vs The Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Smt. Kalawati Devi, the petitioner preferred a writ petition, bearing number W.P. No. 954 (SS) of 2001 in the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital with a contention that her husband Keshav Ram is not traceable since 17.08.1989 and has been declared deserter by the respondents/Army (7-Sikh Light Infantry). The petitioner, accordingly prayed that...

• Transfer Application No. 96 of 2016. Case: D.V.S. Rana Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. O.A. preferred by the petitioner bearing No. 01(J)/2016 before the Armed forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Jabalpur has been transferred to this Bench by the Hon'ble Chairperson of the Armed Forces Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi for adjudication of the controversy raised in the petition. The petitioner has assailed the CRs covering the perio...

• Transferred Application No. 89 of 2016. Case: Mohd. Irfan Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Initially, the petitioner had filed Writ Petition No. 6135 (S/S) of 2013 before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, sitting at Lucknow Bench, Lucknow, which has been transferred to this Tribunal in pursuance to power contained in Section 34 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 by order dated 05.08.2016 for adjudication of controvers...

• M.A. No. 784 of 2016 and O.A. No. 317 of 2016. Case: R.P. Suthan Vs Union of India and Ors. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The Original Application has been filed by Vice Admiral R.P. Suthan, No. 01137H (Retd) seeking the benefit of broad banding of disability element of disability pension granted to him. The applicant has also sought that Regulation 37(b) of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 2008 be quashed as it denies the benefit of Regulation 94(c) of the Pe...

• O.A. No. 93 of 2016. Case: Jadhav Maruti Bhau Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The Original Application has been filed by Jadhav Maruti Bhau, Ex. Naib Subedar No. JC 404396 A, of Brigade of Guards, seeking disability element of disability pension with the benefit of rounding off. The applicant has also sought that Regulation 53(b) of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 2008, be quashed, as it does not provide benefit of

• O.A. No. 95 of 2016. Case: Saju Joseph Vs Union of India and Ors. Armed Forces Tribunal

  2. The applicant was enrolled in the Air Force on 29 Aug 1991 for 20 years regular service with 02 years of reserve liability. He was discharged from service on 30 Sep 2004, at his own request before fulfilling the conditions of enrolment. At the time of discharge he had completed regular service of 13 years and 31 days. He was on the reserve liabi...

Featured documents

• O.A. No. 97 of 2012. Case: (No. 13878546N) Ex Nk S. Jayachandran Vs Union of India. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. This application has been filed by the applicant praying for the relief of examining the validity and propriety of the 2nd respondent in varying the Release Medical Board Proceedings of the applicant and to direct the respondents to pay the eligible disability pension to the applicant from the...

• Review Application No. 10 of 2014 in O.A. No. 37 of 2014. Case: 123554-F, ERA-III-Shibu Yohannan Vs Chief of Naval Staff Naval. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. This application has been filed by the applicant to review the order of dismissal passed in O.A. No. 37 of 2014 dated 22.08.2014 and thereby to allow the Original Application or to modify the order passed in favour of the applicant. 2. We have perused the grounds raised in the Review...

• T.A. No. 20 of 2009. Case: A.L. Jacob Vs Officer I/C. Artillary Records, Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension) and Union of India (UOI) represented by The Secretary Ministry of Defence. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Petitioner, who is an ex-service man, is challenging Ext.P1 order by which the disability element of disability pension was stopped. Petitioner enrolled in the Army on 11.7.1960. He sustained an injury on 10.10.1968 while playing Volley Ball during game parade. He was treated for 'Compression...

• O.A. No. 26 of 2014. Case: Aneesh Raj S. Vs Union of India. Armed Forces Tribunal

  3. The applicant, Annesh Raj S, Ex Sepoy No. 2608421 F, claims disability pension with effect from the date of his discharge from the Army service. He was enrolled in the Army on 26th November 2001 and was discharged on 25th October 2008 under Army Rule 13(3)(iii)(v), as his services were no longer ...

• T.A. No. 152 of 2010. Case: Arun O. Nair, S/o. Omanakuttan Nair, Aged 24, Padinjarakuttu House, Moncompu P.O., Alleppey Dist., Kerala State Vs Senior Records Officer, O/c-Pension Grove, Records Brigade of Guards, Pin 900746, C/o. 56 APO, Addl. DTE Gen. Personal Service, Adjutant General's Branch, Integrated HQ of MOD (Army), DHQ P.O., New Delhi-110011 and Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence Appellate Committee, New Delhi, Rep. by Its Under Secretary, Defence. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The petitioner was discharged from the Army on medical grounds after serving for two years. He is aggrieved by the denial of disability pension and filed this petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala, which has been transferred to this Tribunal. The brief facts of the case is that the...

• OA 2147 of 2012. Case: Balbir Singh Vs Union of India. Armed Forces Tribunal

  i) Directions to the respondents to release the pay and allowances and pensionary benefits of three MACP to the applicants who are retired after 01.01.2006 and benefit of MACP be implemented w.e.f. 01.09.2008 as per Govt. of India Gazette Notification dated 30.08.2008; ii) Direction to quash the...

• O.A. No. 84 of 2012. Case: Benny P.O. Ex. MCPO R. (Tel) Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Heard Mr. V.K. Sathyanathan., for the applicant and Mr.K.M. Jamaludheen for the respondents and perused the record. The applicant, Benny P.O., Ex Master Chief Petty Officer (Tel) No. 111927F, filed the instant O.A. for a direction to the respondents to confer on him the Honorary rank of Sub...

• M.A. No. 19/2011 in T.A. No. 60 of 2009 and W.P. (C) No. 116 of 1994. Case: Brig (Retd) P.K. Dutta Vs Chief of the Army Staff & Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Vide this M.A. applicant sought implementation of the judgment and order dated 05.08.2010 passed by Hon'ble Armed Forces Tribunal(PB). However, respondents decided to go in for SLP which came up for hearing on 19.03.2012 vide Criminal Appeal No. 558/12. The Hon'ble Apex Court dismissed the...

• O.A. No. 217/2009. Case: Brig. Rakesh Sharma Vs Union of India (UOI) and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The applicant vide this original application has prayed for quashing of the letters dated 11.04.2007 and 08.12.2009 in which the applicant?s claim to the rank of Major General was rejected. It is also prayed that respondents may be directed to expunge the impugned Annual Confidential Report (ACR)...

• T.A. No. 244/2010. Case: Cdr. Alok Kumar Pathak Vs Union of India (UOI) and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  2. Petitioner by this petition has prayed that an order or direction may be issued for setting aside the letters dated 31.01.2003, 03.03.2004 and 27.05.2004 of respondents and Annexure P-10 and P-17 to the extent of award of these censure letters and to the extent of withdrawal of the petitioner...