Armed Forces Tribunal

Court

Latest documents

• Transferred Application No. 1364 of 2010. Case: Mohan Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Being aggrieved with the impugned order of punishment dated 28.02.2002 of severe reprimand and denial of the rank of Sub Major and also salary of the said rank w.e.f. 01.08.2000 to 31.08.2002, petitioner preferred a writ petition, bearing No. 1301 of 2004 (SS) in the High Court of Uttaranchal, now Uttarakhand, Nainital, which has been transferre...

• O.A. No. 122 of 2011. Case: Sanjay Kumar Verma Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Present O.A. has been preferred under section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (In short the Act'), being aggrieved by the order of dismissal dated 19.03.2007, the impugned discharge certificate dated 27.05.2009 and the order rejecting the appeal of the Applicant dated 27.01.2011 2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the case a...

• OA 593/2016. Case: Arun Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  3. The facts that are necessary for disposing of this original application as stated by the learned counsel for the applicant are as follows:- The applicant was commissioned in the Corps of Engineers in the Army on 13.06.1981. He was promoted from time to time to higher ranks. On his promotion as Brigadier, he was posted as Chief Engineer, Project

• OA 302/2014. Case: Kamla Kanta Das Vs The Union of India and Ors. Armed Forces Tribunal

  (d) To direct disciplinary action against Col. Vishu Sikka and the members of the C OI in accordance with para 4 of Army HQ letter No. 32908/AG/DV-1(P) dated 16 October, 2000 for having connived with Gen Cruz. (e) To direct disciplinary action against Maj Gen SA Cruz, VSM for having misused his position, having forged documents, having tutored wit...

• T.A. No. 1000 of 2010. Case: Kalawati Devi Vs The Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Smt. Kalawati Devi, the petitioner preferred a writ petition, bearing number W.P. No. 954 (SS) of 2001 in the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital with a contention that her husband Keshav Ram is not traceable since 17.08.1989 and has been declared deserter by the respondents/Army (7-Sikh Light Infantry). The petitioner, accordingly prayed that...

• Transfer Application No. 96 of 2016. Case: D.V.S. Rana Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. O.A. preferred by the petitioner bearing No. 01(J)/2016 before the Armed forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Jabalpur has been transferred to this Bench by the Hon'ble Chairperson of the Armed Forces Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi for adjudication of the controversy raised in the petition. The petitioner has assailed the CRs covering the perio...

• Transferred Application No. 89 of 2016. Case: Mohd. Irfan Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Initially, the petitioner had filed Writ Petition No. 6135 (S/S) of 2013 before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, sitting at Lucknow Bench, Lucknow, which has been transferred to this Tribunal in pursuance to power contained in Section 34 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 by order dated 05.08.2016 for adjudication of controvers...

• M.A. No. 784 of 2016 and O.A. No. 317 of 2016. Case: R.P. Suthan Vs Union of India and Ors. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The Original Application has been filed by Vice Admiral R.P. Suthan, No. 01137H (Retd) seeking the benefit of broad banding of disability element of disability pension granted to him. The applicant has also sought that Regulation 37(b) of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 2008 be quashed as it denies the benefit of Regulation 94(c) of the Pe...

• O.A. No. 93 of 2016. Case: Jadhav Maruti Bhau Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The Original Application has been filed by Jadhav Maruti Bhau, Ex. Naib Subedar No. JC 404396 A, of Brigade of Guards, seeking disability element of disability pension with the benefit of rounding off. The applicant has also sought that Regulation 53(b) of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 2008, be quashed, as it does not provide benefit of

• O.A. No. 95 of 2016. Case: Saju Joseph Vs Union of India and Ors. Armed Forces Tribunal

  2. The applicant was enrolled in the Air Force on 29 Aug 1991 for 20 years regular service with 02 years of reserve liability. He was discharged from service on 30 Sep 2004, at his own request before fulfilling the conditions of enrolment. At the time of discharge he had completed regular service of 13 years and 31 days. He was on the reserve liabi...

Featured documents

• O.A. Nos. 23 and 26 of 2013. Case: 1. No. 2570950 F, Ex Hav & Hony Nb. Sub. The Madras Regiment, 2. No. 8026277N EX-HAV (HONY NB/SUB), No. 14293819F EX HAV (HONY NB SUB) and No. 14219516X EX HAV (HONY NB SUB) Vs 1. The Union of India and Ors., 2. The Union of India, The Chief of Army Staff, The Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension) and The Oic Records, [Alongwith O.A. No. 27 of 2013]. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the respondents and perused the record. All the applicants, who retired as Havildars but were conferred the honorary rank of Naib Subedars after retirement, claim service pension of the rank of Naib Subedar with effect from 1st January 2006 in...

• T.A. No. 131 of 2009 and W.P. No. 7339 of 2006. Case: A. Subbiah S/o. Late Mr. T. Andhi Nadar Vs The Union of India (UOI) rep. by its Secretary to the Government, Ministry of Defence and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The applicant in this application, has filed W.P. No. 7339 of 2006 before the Honourable High Court, Madras, which has subsequently been transferred to this Tribunal, after the formation of Armed Forces Tribunal under Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007 and renumbered as T.A. No. 131 of 2009. 2. It...

• T. A. No. 572 of 2009 Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3309 of 1999. Case: Amresh Pandey Vs Union of India & Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. This writ petition was filed by the petitioner before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and it was transferred to this Tribunal after its formation. Petitioner vide this petition has prayed to set aside/quash the order of appeal dated 03.10.1998 and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner...

• M.A. No. 35 of 2012 & O.A. No. 24 of 2012. Case: Appukuttan R. Vs Union of India, The Senior Record Officer, Sena Seva Corps Abhilekh (Dakshin) and The Director General, Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension). Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Heard Mr. B. Harishkumar for the applicant and Mr. K.M. Jamaludeen, Senior Panel Counsel, for the respondents, and perused the record. The applicant has impugned his discharge from the Army, which was made as back as on 25.9.1973 under Army Rule 13(3)III(v), therefore, there has been a delay of...

• T.A. No. 38 of 2010. Case: Badri Koteshwar Rao S/o. Kasaiah Vs The Union of India (UOI) through the Secretary Ministry of Defence, Government of India, The Officer-in-Charge, Madras Engineers Group, The Chief Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension) and The Commanding Officer 3 Engineers Regiment. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The unfortunate petitioner, who had undergone left nephrectomy while in service and according to the respondents, refused to accept the sheltered appointment offered by the respondents, has challenged the order of discharge passed on 31.05.1998 under Rule 13(3)(III)(v) of the Army Rules, by way...

• OA 1180 of 2011. Case: Basavaraj Paled Vs Union of India. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 making a prayer that the discharge order issued by respondent No. 3, OIC Records Armoured Corps, C/O 56 APO, dated 20 December 2010 (Annexure A-4) may be quashed and the petitioner be allowed to...

• Transferred Application No. 1045 of 2010. Case: Bishnu Prasad Thapa Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Initially, the applicant had filed writ petition No. 76892 of 2005 before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, which after constitution of the Armed Forces Tribunal has been transferred to this Bench of the Tribunal and registered as T.A. No. 1045 of 2010. The applicant has claimed ...

• T.A. No. 272/2010. Case: Brig. Devinder Singh Vs Union of India (UOI) and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  2. Petitioner by this petition has prayed to direct the respondents to pass an order addressing with clarity the vital issues raised by him in statutory complaint dated 27.03.2002 at paragraphs 8 to 10 and 12 thereof. It is also prayed that part of order dated 18.05.2004 rejecting his statutory...

• T.A. No. 46 of 2010. Case: C. Subba Rayudu S/o C. Narappa Vs The Major, Senior Record Officer, Madras Regiment. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The petitioner, who had put in approximately one year of Army service, unfortunately met with an injury during his course of training in the scrotum, was discharged out of service on medical ground on 20th August 1986, after exhausting all his remedies for the claim of disability pension, has...

• O.A. No. 314 of 2011. Case: Capt. Prabhat Chaturvedi Vs Union of India & Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Petitioner by this petition has prayed that the order dated 16th June 2011 may be quashed having been issued ignoring the service condition laid down in the advertisement on the basis of which the Petitioner joined the Army Medical Corps (AMC). It is also prayed that the Respondents may be...