Armed Forces Tribunal

Jurisdiction/Issuing Court

Latest documents

• Transferred Application No. 1364 of 2010. Case: Mohan Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Being aggrieved with the impugned order of punishment dated 28.02.2002 of severe reprimand and denial of the rank of Sub Major and also salary of the said rank w.e.f. 01.08.2000 to 31.08.2002, petitioner preferred a writ petition, bearing No. 1301 of 2004 (SS) in the High Court of Uttaranchal, now Uttarakhand, Nainital, which has been transferre...

• O.A. No. 122 of 2011. Case: Sanjay Kumar Verma Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Present O.A. has been preferred under section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (In short the Act'), being aggrieved by the order of dismissal dated 19.03.2007, the impugned discharge certificate dated 27.05.2009 and the order rejecting the appeal of the Applicant dated 27.01.2011 2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the case a...

• OA 593/2016. Case: Arun Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  3. The facts that are necessary for disposing of this original application as stated by the learned counsel for the applicant are as follows:- The applicant was commissioned in the Corps of Engineers in the Army on 13.06.1981. He was promoted from time to time to higher ranks. On his promotion as Brigadier, he was posted as Chief Engineer, Project

• OA 302/2014. Case: Kamla Kanta Das Vs The Union of India and Ors. Armed Forces Tribunal

  (d) To direct disciplinary action against Col. Vishu Sikka and the members of the C OI in accordance with para 4 of Army HQ letter No. 32908/AG/DV-1(P) dated 16 October, 2000 for having connived with Gen Cruz. (e) To direct disciplinary action against Maj Gen SA Cruz, VSM for having misused his position, having forged documents, having tutored wit...

• T.A. No. 1000 of 2010. Case: Kalawati Devi Vs The Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Smt. Kalawati Devi, the petitioner preferred a writ petition, bearing number W.P. No. 954 (SS) of 2001 in the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital with a contention that her husband Keshav Ram is not traceable since 17.08.1989 and has been declared deserter by the respondents/Army (7-Sikh Light Infantry). The petitioner, accordingly prayed that...

• Transfer Application No. 96 of 2016. Case: D.V.S. Rana Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. O.A. preferred by the petitioner bearing No. 01(J)/2016 before the Armed forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Jabalpur has been transferred to this Bench by the Hon'ble Chairperson of the Armed Forces Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi for adjudication of the controversy raised in the petition. The petitioner has assailed the CRs covering the perio...

• Transferred Application No. 89 of 2016. Case: Mohd. Irfan Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Initially, the petitioner had filed Writ Petition No. 6135 (S/S) of 2013 before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, sitting at Lucknow Bench, Lucknow, which has been transferred to this Tribunal in pursuance to power contained in Section 34 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 by order dated 05.08.2016 for adjudication of controvers...

• M.A. No. 784 of 2016 and O.A. No. 317 of 2016. Case: R.P. Suthan Vs Union of India and Ors. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The Original Application has been filed by Vice Admiral R.P. Suthan, No. 01137H (Retd) seeking the benefit of broad banding of disability element of disability pension granted to him. The applicant has also sought that Regulation 37(b) of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 2008 be quashed as it denies the benefit of Regulation 94(c) of the Pe...

• O.A. No. 93 of 2016. Case: Jadhav Maruti Bhau Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The Original Application has been filed by Jadhav Maruti Bhau, Ex. Naib Subedar No. JC 404396 A, of Brigade of Guards, seeking disability element of disability pension with the benefit of rounding off. The applicant has also sought that Regulation 53(b) of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 2008, be quashed, as it does not provide benefit of

• O.A. No. 105 of 2016. Case: Vinodkumar K. Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  2. The applicant was enrolled in the Army Ordnance Corps (AOC) on 21 December 1990 and was invalided out from service with effect from 21 October 2006 under Army Rules 13(3)III(iii) having been found medically unfit for further retention in service. The Invaliding Medical Board (IMB) assessed him to have the disability 'Recurrent Depressive Disorde...

Featured documents

• O.A. No. 97 of 2012. Case: (No. 13878546N) Ex Nk S. Jayachandran Vs Union of India. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. This application has been filed by the applicant praying for the relief of examining the validity and propriety of the 2nd respondent in varying the Release Medical Board Proceedings of the applicant and to direct the respondents to pay the eligible disability pension to the applicant from the...

• OA No. 28 of 2011. Case: 17. Sub (Now Nb Sub) (GD) Rajbir Vs Union of India & Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The petitioner vide this petition has prayed to quash the orders dated 13.09.2010 by which the petitioner has been ordered to be discharged from service as well as order dated 24.12.2010 by which the promotion of the petitioner has been cancelled alongwith order dated 27.12.2010 issued by...

• Original Application No. 168 of 2013. Case: Abhilash Singh Kushwah Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  2. The applicant was enrolled in the Army (PARA Regt) on 17.04.1998 and latter on posted to 7 PARA. He was transferred to Rajput Regiment being non PARA institution on 30.01.2011 and thereby posted to 26 Rajput on 30.04.2011. He was discharged from service on 07.01.2003 in pursuance of powers...

• M.A. No. 361 of 2013 in O.A. No. 3 of 2012. Case: Anil Kumar B. Vs Union of India. Armed Forces Tribunal

  2. The final order in the Original Application was rendered on 9th January, 2013 with the direction to the respondents to pay the disability pension to the applicant for life at the rate of 50% disability with effect from 1st July, 2005. They were granted four months time to pay the entire arrears. ...

• T.A No. 216 of 2010 (Writ Petition (C) No. 11195 of 2005). Case: Ashandar Kumar Vs Union of India (UOI) and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. This writ petition has been filed by the Appellant who is aggrieved by the Summary Court Martial proceedings, findings and sentence of 6.1.2004, by which he was tried for an offence under Army Act Section 40(c) and sentenced to three months imprisonment and dismissal from service. On formation...

• OA 2147 of 2012. Case: Balbir Singh Vs Union of India. Armed Forces Tribunal

  i) Directions to the respondents to release the pay and allowances and pensionary benefits of three MACP to the applicants who are retired after 01.01.2006 and benefit of MACP be implemented w.e.f. 01.09.2008 as per Govt. of India Gazette Notification dated 30.08.2008; ii) Direction to quash the...

• OA 3649 of 2012. Case: Bhadar Ram and Others Vs Union of India and Others. Armed Forces Tribunal

  3. The petitioners claim for grant of pension of Naib Subedar having been granted the rank of Honorary Naib Subedar after retirement, and prior to 01.01.2006. Since both the learned counsel agree that in cases of such persons entitlement to grant of pension to Naib Subedar is upheld by judgment of...

• T.A. No. 519/2010. Case: Brig (Retd.) Brijendra Singh Vs Union of India (UOI) and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  2. Petitioner by this petition has alleged that he has not been given the disability pension. He made earlier petition before Adjutant General and CDA but without result. Therefore, petitioner has filed the present petition seeking direction to release disability element of pension to him as he had ...

• O.A. No. 04 of 2013. Case: Brig. V. Jai Kumar (Retd.) Vs The Secretary to Government of India and The Military Secretary Military Secretary's Branch/MS (X). Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Petitioner seeks relief to quash respondents' letters No. A/47063/R/1SB/SIGNS/MS(X), dated 27th July 2010, even No. dated 4th January 2011 vide which the petitioner was informed he had not been selected for promotion and even No. dated 10th August 2011 vide which he was informed his case had...

• T.A. No. 153 of 2010. Case: C.K. Vijayan S/o. late Krishnan Achari Vs Union of India (UOI) represented by Secretary Ministry of Defence and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The applicant, an Ex-service man who was discharged from service as per Ext.P1 Summary Court Martial Order dated 24.6.1997, has filed this proceedings as a writ petition before the Honourable High Court of Kerala claiming pension. The case has been transferred to this Tribunal consequent to its...