Armed Forces Tribunal

Jurisdiction/Issuing Court

Latest documents

• Transferred Application No. 1364 of 2010. Case: Mohan Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Being aggrieved with the impugned order of punishment dated 28.02.2002 of severe reprimand and denial of the rank of Sub Major and also salary of the said rank w.e.f. 01.08.2000 to 31.08.2002, petitioner preferred a writ petition, bearing No. 1301 of 2004 (SS) in the High Court of Uttaranchal, now Uttarakhand, Nainital, which has been transferre...

• O.A. No. 122 of 2011. Case: Sanjay Kumar Verma Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Present O.A. has been preferred under section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (In short the Act'), being aggrieved by the order of dismissal dated 19.03.2007, the impugned discharge certificate dated 27.05.2009 and the order rejecting the appeal of the Applicant dated 27.01.2011 2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the case a...

• OA 593/2016. Case: Arun Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  3. The facts that are necessary for disposing of this original application as stated by the learned counsel for the applicant are as follows:- The applicant was commissioned in the Corps of Engineers in the Army on 13.06.1981. He was promoted from time to time to higher ranks. On his promotion as Brigadier, he was posted as Chief Engineer, Project

• OA 302/2014. Case: Kamla Kanta Das Vs The Union of India and Ors. Armed Forces Tribunal

  (d) To direct disciplinary action against Col. Vishu Sikka and the members of the C OI in accordance with para 4 of Army HQ letter No. 32908/AG/DV-1(P) dated 16 October, 2000 for having connived with Gen Cruz. (e) To direct disciplinary action against Maj Gen SA Cruz, VSM for having misused his position, having forged documents, having tutored wit...

• T.A. No. 1000 of 2010. Case: Kalawati Devi Vs The Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Smt. Kalawati Devi, the petitioner preferred a writ petition, bearing number W.P. No. 954 (SS) of 2001 in the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital with a contention that her husband Keshav Ram is not traceable since 17.08.1989 and has been declared deserter by the respondents/Army (7-Sikh Light Infantry). The petitioner, accordingly prayed that...

• Transfer Application No. 96 of 2016. Case: D.V.S. Rana Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. O.A. preferred by the petitioner bearing No. 01(J)/2016 before the Armed forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Jabalpur has been transferred to this Bench by the Hon'ble Chairperson of the Armed Forces Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi for adjudication of the controversy raised in the petition. The petitioner has assailed the CRs covering the perio...

• Transferred Application No. 89 of 2016. Case: Mohd. Irfan Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Initially, the petitioner had filed Writ Petition No. 6135 (S/S) of 2013 before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, sitting at Lucknow Bench, Lucknow, which has been transferred to this Tribunal in pursuance to power contained in Section 34 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 by order dated 05.08.2016 for adjudication of controvers...

• M.A. No. 784 of 2016 and O.A. No. 317 of 2016. Case: R.P. Suthan Vs Union of India and Ors. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The Original Application has been filed by Vice Admiral R.P. Suthan, No. 01137H (Retd) seeking the benefit of broad banding of disability element of disability pension granted to him. The applicant has also sought that Regulation 37(b) of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 2008 be quashed as it denies the benefit of Regulation 94(c) of the Pe...

• O.A. No. 93 of 2016. Case: Jadhav Maruti Bhau Vs Union of India and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The Original Application has been filed by Jadhav Maruti Bhau, Ex. Naib Subedar No. JC 404396 A, of Brigade of Guards, seeking disability element of disability pension with the benefit of rounding off. The applicant has also sought that Regulation 53(b) of the Pension Regulations for the Army, 2008, be quashed, as it does not provide benefit of

• O.A. No. 95 of 2016. Case: Saju Joseph Vs Union of India and Ors. Armed Forces Tribunal

  2. The applicant was enrolled in the Air Force on 29 Aug 1991 for 20 years regular service with 02 years of reserve liability. He was discharged from service on 30 Sep 2004, at his own request before fulfilling the conditions of enrolment. At the time of discharge he had completed regular service of 13 years and 31 days. He was on the reserve liabi...

Featured documents

• O.A. Nos. 23 and 26 of 2013. Case: 1. No. 2570950 F, Ex Hav & Hony Nb. Sub. The Madras Regiment, 2. No. 8026277N EX-HAV (HONY NB/SUB), No. 14293819F EX HAV (HONY NB SUB) and No. 14219516X EX HAV (HONY NB SUB) Vs 1. The Union of India and Ors., 2. The Union of India, The Chief of Army Staff, The Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension) and The Oic Records, [Alongwith O.A. No. 27 of 2013]. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the respondents and perused the record. All the applicants, who retired as Havildars but were conferred the honorary rank of Naib Subedars after retirement, claim service pension of the rank of Naib Subedar with effect from 1st January 2006 in...

• O.A. No. 62 of 2013. Case: A. Srinivasan, Lt. Col. (Retd.) Vs Union of India, Through the Secretary, The Additional Directorate General Territorial Army and The Controller General of Defence Accounts. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. This application has been filed by the applicant praying for production of the records in respect of the impugned order No. UO No. 5662/AT-P/Vol. XVI dated 21.3.2013, regarding rejection of Territorial Army pension passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to...

• MA 667 of 2012 and RA 22 of 2012 in OA 1182 of 2011. Case: Amit Kumar Roy Vs Union of India and others. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner on the review application. The only submission was made that the petitioner should be and should have been allowed to amend the OA, which has been dismissed as infructuous, more particularly, because the order passed on 26th March, 2012, was placed on...

• M.A. No. 35 of 2012 & O.A. No. 24 of 2012. Case: Appukuttan R. Vs Union of India, The Senior Record Officer, Sena Seva Corps Abhilekh (Dakshin) and The Director General, Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension). Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Heard Mr. B. Harishkumar for the applicant and Mr. K.M. Jamaludeen, Senior Panel Counsel, for the respondents, and perused the record. The applicant has impugned his discharge from the Army, which was made as back as on 25.9.1973 under Army Rule 13(3)III(v), therefore, there has been a delay of...

• O.A. No. 98 of 2010. Case: Babu. T.J. S/o. Joseph, Aged 49, Ex. 624650-Ex Corporal, Thekkotarathil House, Chandanakampara P.O., Kannur District, Kerala 670633 Vs Air Force Record Office, Subroto Park, New Delhi - 10, The Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Defence Secretariat, New Delhi and Union of India, Represented By Its Secretary to Ministry of Defence, Defence Secretariat, New Delhi. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Heard Mr. Ramesh. C.R. holding brief for Mr. Johnson Manayani, counsel for the applicant and Mr. Tojan J. Vathikulam, Central Government Counsel, for the respondents and perused the record. By this application under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, the applicant has prayed for...

• OA 1180 of 2011. Case: Basavaraj Paled Vs Union of India. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 making a prayer that the discharge order issued by respondent No. 3, OIC Records Armoured Corps, C/O 56 APO, dated 20 December 2010 (Annexure A-4) may be quashed and the petitioner be allowed to...

• OA 128 of 2013. Case: Bikram Chand Vs Union of India and Others. Armed Forces Tribunal

  3. The petitioner claims for grant of pension of Naib Subedar having been granted the rank of Honorary Naib Subedar after retirement, and prior to 01.01.2006. Since both the learned counsel agree that in cases of such persons entitlement to grant of pension to Naib Subedar is upheld by judgment of...

• O.A. No. 199/2009. Case: Brig. Abhay Kumar Vs Union of India (UOI) and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The petitioner vide his application has prayed to set aside the orders dated 24th November, 2008 and 15th January, 2009 rejecting the Statutory Complaint and Non-Statutory Complaint respectively. He further seeks setting aside the ICR initiated by Respondent No. 3, covering the period 01st July, ...

• TA No. 126 of 2010. Case: C. Krishnan, S/o. Kelu Nair, Aged 65 Years, Ex Sapper No. 1329413, Chellattandavida House, Elangode P.O., Panoor VIA, Kannur District, Kerala State-670692 Vs The Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Defence, Sena Bhavan, New Delhi, Pin 110066 and Ors.. Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. Heard Mr. M.P. Vijayan for the petitioner and Mr. P.J. Philip, Central Government Counsel for the respondents, and perused the record. The petitioner filed initially the Writ Petition (C) No. 29474 of 2007 in the Honourable High Court of Kerala for issue of a writ of mandamus directing the...

• O.A. No. 22 of 2010. Case: Capt. N. Gopalakrishnan (Retired) Vs Union of India (UOI) rep. by the Secretary, The Director (Pension/Policy) Government of India and Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pensions). Armed Forces Tribunal

  1. The petitioner has moved this application challenging the three orders of the second respondent vide orders No. 1(1)/2007-D (Pen/Policy) dated 20.5.2009, No. 1(1)/2007-D (Pen/Policy) dated 03.09.2009 and No. M.MODP/MNL/31/2009 dated 09.10.2009. 2. The Registry of Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional ...