Appellate Tribunals > Gujarat High Court CEGAT & CESTAT Cases

3. The facts in brief are that the petitioner is a company engaged in manufacturing of various kinds of Hand Tools. The petitioner exports the final product outside India. Therefore, in terms of Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, the petitioner claimed rebate of the central excise duty paid on input used in manufacturing of the goods exported. The wa...

2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying inter alia for a direction to the respondents Revenue authorities to release an amount of Rs. 40 lakhs towards the claim of drawback along with interest as applicable under Section 75A of the Customs Act. 3. The facts in brief are that the petitioner is engaged in the...

2. In Special Civil Application No. 8025/2015, the petitioner has challenged an order dated 9-10-2014 [2015 (320) E.L.T. 684 (G.O.I.)] by which the Government of India allowed the revision petition of the department and set aside the order of Commissioner (Appeals) dated 11-7-2013. The petitioner is in the business of manufacturing goods which are

2. By way of present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants have prayed for enlarging them on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with File No. DGCEI/AZU/12(4)144/2015-16, registered with Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence, Ahmedabad Zonal Unit, Ahmedabad. 3. O...