Extract
Lata Sedha & Anr. VS. Deepak Sedha
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCRL. APPEAL NO. 1124 OF 2009 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.6816/2008 Bhairon Singh ..Appellant Versus State of Madhya Pradesh ..Respondent JUDGEMENTR.M. LODHA, J.Leave granted.2. The question that arises for consideration in this appeal by special leave is : in a case where accused has been acquitted of the offence punishable under Sections 304-B and 306 IPC, and the death of wife is neither homicidal nor suicidal but accidental, whether the oral evidence of witnesses about what the deceased had told them against the accused about the treatment meted out to her is admissible under Section 32 (1) of the Evidence Act to sustain conviction under Section 498A,IPC?3. Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 reads thus: "32. Cases in which statement of relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found, etc., is relevant.-- Statements, written or verbal, of relevant facts made by a person who is dead, or who cannot be found, or who has become incapable of giving evidence, or whose attendance cannot be procured, without an amount of delay or expense which under the circumstance...See the full content of this document