sarla mudgal vs union of india
W.P. (C) 3604/2014. Case: Mool Chand Kucheria Vs Union of India & Anr.. Delhi High Court
Judgment: 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed as a Public Interest Litigation seeks a direction to the Govt. of India, to implement in a time bound manner the suggestion contained in the judgment of the Supreme Court in Sarla Mudgal Vs. Union of India 1995(3) SCC 6...
A Precise Cut
... protection was first proposed; the Aruna Roy vs Union of India ruling where the court made a distinction between religious instruction and religious education; the TMA Pai and other cases on the rights of minority educational institutions; the Stanislaus case that denied constitutional protection to a right to propagate; the Jasani case where courts enforced disincentives for converting out of Hinduism, and the Shah Bano and Sarla Mudgal cases
- WOMEN AND LAW: AN INDIAN PERSPECTIVE. History, International Conventions, Indian Constitution and Other Laws relating to Women
Writ Petition No. 32858/2009 (S-RES). Case: Smt. Radharani Mahadev Kolambe Vs The State of Karnataka, The High Court of Karnataka and The Civil Judges (Junior Division), Selection Committee, High Court of Karnataka. Karnataka High Court
1. In response to a Notification No. CJRC-1/2006 dated 1st April 2006, inviting applications for recruitment to the posts of Civil Judges (Junior Division), in accordance with the Karnataka Judicial Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2004, the petitioner, an advocate, submitted application. The petitioner was successful in the written examination and wa...
... by Article 234 of the Constitution of India, by His Excellency, the Governor of Karnataka, ... of service of persons serving the Union or a State, as the case may be, by an enactment ...16. In Sarla Mudgal vs. Union of India - (1995) 3 SCC 635, ...
'Law Needed to Stop Men From Converting for Bigamy' [India]
... Court had outlawed the practice by its order in the case of Sarla Mudgal vs Union of India in 1995. The ruling was reaffirmed five ...
Courtroom Drama ; Landmark Judicial Decisions Changed the Constitution As Well As Everyday Life. Their Impact Still Echoes.
Champakam Dorairajan Vs State of Madras 1951 Well before Arjun Singh, this case concerning admissions of backward classes to educational institutions led B.R. Ambedkar, then the law minister, to pilot the first-ever amendment to the Constitution.
...'s lover, marked the end of jury trials in India when the officer was let off. Golaknath Vs State ...Madhav Jiwaji Rao Scindia Vs Union of India 1970. The Supreme Court rejected a 1970 ...Sarla Mudgal Vs Union of India 1995. The Supreme Court ...
Civil Review No. 22 of 2004. Case: Manoranjan Prasad Sinha Vs Managing Committee of Delhi Public School Sail Township and Mahesh Bareja, Delhi Public School Township. Jharkhand High Court
1. This civil review has been preferred against the judgment dated 7th April, 2003, delivered by the learned Single Judge of this court in Second Appeal No. 21 of 2000 (R). I have heard party-in-person, who has mainly submitted that several errors have been committed by the learned Single Judge and several factually incorrect statements have been m...
...(b) Lily Thomas, etc. Etc. Vs. Union of India and others, reported in AIR 2000 SC ... of reviewing the judgment in Saria Mudgal's case (1995 AIR SCW 2326: AIR 1995 SC 1531: 1995 ... those pleas, passed the judgment in Sarla Mudgal's case. We have also not found any mistake ...
Review Petition (Crl.) No. 453 of 2012 in W.P. (Crl.) 135 of 2008 (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). Case: Kamlesh Verma Vs Mayawati and Ors.. Supreme Court
1. This petition has been filed by the Petitioner herein-Kamlesh Verma seeking review of the judgment and order dated 06.07.2012 passed in Mayawati v. Union of India and Ors. (2012) 8 SCC 106 (Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 135 of 2008). 2. Brief Facts: (a) This Court, by order dated 16.07.2003 in LA. No. 387 of 2003 in Writ Petition (C) No. 13381 of 1...