-
Case Law
Executive Committee Of U.P. State Warehousingcorporation, VS. Chandra Kiran Tyagi
Recurso nº 1639, Ponente Vaidyialingam
Under s. 28 of the Agricultural Produce (Development and Warehousing) Corporation Act, 1956, the appellant was established as the Warehousing Corporation of the State of U.P. Section 54 of the Act gives power to 'a Warehousing Corporation to make regulations not inconsistent with the Act and the Rules made thereunder and the regulations are to provide for all matters for which provision is necessary or expedient for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of the Act. Regulation ...
-
Case Law
M.J. Exports Ltd. And Anr. VS. Customs, Excise And Gold (Control) Appellatetribunal, Bomba
Recurso nº 12373, Ponente Rangnathan,s.
The Imports (Control) Order, 1955 provides that the items of goods 301 set out in Schedule 1 to the said order cannot be imported except under a Licence or Customs clearance permit. Clause 11(4) of the Order, however, empowers the Central Government to issue an Open General Licence (OGL) permitting the import of such goods subject to the conditions specified. Appendix 6 to the Import-Export Policy 1988-91 deals with categories of goods that can be imported under an Open General Licence and...
-
Case Law
Santosh Kumar & Ors. VS. Central Warehousing Corporation & Anr.
Recurso nº 9106, Ponente Reddy,o. Chinnappa (J)
Award of Collector under s.11 - Whether Government, Company or local authority can seek a reference under s. 18, except on grounds of fraud, corruption or collusion - Whether petition under Article 226 filed by Government or anyone claiming through it, challenging the Collector's order declining to make reference under s.18 maintainable. Pursuant to the awards made under s.11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 by the Collector determining the compensation proposed to be paid to appella...
-
THE ARMS ACT, 1959 ACT NO. 54 OF 1959 [23rd December, 1959.] ...... CHAP PRELIMINARY CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY - (1) This Act may be called the Arms Act, 1959. (2) It extends ...... - (1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-- (a) "...
-
Case Law
Managing Director, Uttar Pradesh Warehousing Corporation &a VS. Vinay Narayan Vajpayee
Recurso nº 4627, Ponente Sarkaria,ranjit Singh
The respondent was an employee of a statutory body. On allegations of theft, misappropriation of stocks and certain other irregularities a preliminary enquiry was conducted by the Managing Director (the appellant) and charges were framed against the employee. In the explanation submitted by him he expressly demanded that he wished to cross-examine certain witnesses whose names were given by him, and wanted to examine certain other persons as witnesses. A few months thereafter, the appellant...
-
Case Law
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kanpur Etc. VS. M/s. Mother India
Recurso nº 9222, Ponente Tulzapurkar,v.D.
The Respondent-assessee in the Civil Appeals had an unabsorbed business 1088 of Rs. 67534 and unabsorbed depreciation of Rs. 1,78,154 at the end of assessment year 1950-51. The respondent's income without taking into account the current depreciation was Rs. 50,624 in 1951-52 and Rs. 64332 in 1952-53. The amount of current depreciation was, however, Rs. 58,140 in 1951-52 and Rs. 44,580 in 1952-53. The respondent contended before I.T.O. that before deducting the current depreciation from t...
-
Case Law
Kayastha Pathshala, Allahabad Andanr. Etc. Etc. VS. Rajendra Prasad And Anr.
Recurso nº 7714, Ponente Shetty,k.J. (J)
The respondent was appointed on 15.7.1962 as a Chemistry lecturer in Kulohaskar Ashram Agriculture Intermediate College run by the appellant society. By a communication dated 20.6.1963, he was informed by the management that his services were no longer required after 15.7.1963. He filed a civil suit for permanent injunction restraining the manage- ment from proceeding with the proposed action. But the management having withdrawn the letter, he withdrew the suit as having become infructuou...
-
Case Law
Vidya Ram Mishra VS. Managing Committee, Shri Jai Narain College.
Recurso nº 6905, Ponente Mathew
The appellant joined as a lecturer in a College in U.P. On the hub ,of certain complaints received by the Manager of the College, charges were framed against him and his explanation, was called for. He submitted an explanation. The explanation was found unsatisfactory and the Managing Committee passed a resolution for removal of the appellant from service. The relevant statutes governing the present case are Statutes 151, 152 and 153 framed under the provisions of the Lucknow University ...
-
Case Law
Chowgule & Co. Private Limited Etc. VS. Union Of India & Ors.
Recurso nº 8800, Ponente Reddy,o. Chinnappa (J)
The appellants in Civil Appeal No. 179 of 1985 carry on business of exporting iron ore to various countries. Previ- ously iron ore used to be brought to the harbour from var- ious mines by barges and unloaded in the harbour. Thereaf- ter, the iron ore could be loaded on board ocean going ore carriers. Alternately, they could be directly unloaded in stream into the ocean going ore carriers. Shallow draught of the harbour prevented large ocean going ore carrying vessels from entering the harb...
-
Under a voluntary retirement scheme in force in the company the petitioner, a clerk in Burmah Shell Oil Storage Ltd., retired voluntarily after qualifying for pension. The pension payable to him was regulated by the terms of a trust deed of 1950 under which a pension fund was set up and regulations were made for its administration. The petitioner was also covered by a scheme under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and to gratuity under the Payment of Grat...
Refine search
Search within 44 Search results “india warehousing act”